Svetlin

Check for the rafale at capun's site

[station1] //inner station SystemType=WEAPON_STATION StationID=1 StationGroupID=1 StationType=EXTERNAL AttachmentPosition=-3.051,-1.653,-0.126 AttachmentAngles=0.0,0.0,0.0 EjectVelocity=0.0,0.0,-1.0 LoadLimit=1790 AllowedWeaponClass=IRM,AHM,EOGR,EOGB,ARM,CGR,ASM,2IR AttachmentType=WP,SOVIET ModelNodeName=Station1 DiameterLimit=0.5 LengthLimit=6.3 PylonMass=86.18 PylonDragArea=0.02 [station2] //inner station SystemType=WEAPON_STATION StationID=2 StationGroupID=1 StationType=EXTERNAL AttachmentPosition=3.051,-1.653,-0.126 AttachmentAngles=0.0,0.0,0.0 EjectVelocity=0.0,0.0,-1.0 LoadLimit=1790 AllowedWeaponClass=IRM,AHM,EOGR,EOGB,ARM,CGR,ASM,2IR AttachmentType=WP,SOVIET ModelNodeName=Station2 DiameterLimit=0.5 LengthLimit=6.3 PylonMass=86.18 PylonDragArea=0.02 In MiG-31BM_DATA.ini and MiG-31M_DATA.ini I switched the bolded lines between the 2 listed stations. The way uploaded, station 1 was on the right wing (should be on the left wing per the OUT file) and station 2 was on the left wing (should be on the right wing per the out file). That solved for me the issue with APU-62 launchers, appearing in mirrored position. Thank you Erwin for another great mod :good:

EricJ, truly sorry - my typo, meant to say PTB-1150 from lindr2. Note to self: Never, never, never write at CA forums while at work

EricJ, I am using lindr2's PTB-1500 with slightly modified texture. Lindr2's PTB-1500 are in his weapons packs available here at CA. PTB-1500 is the correct wing tank per my knowledge.

Thanks, I will try that later today. I have to see in the OUT file if there is something similar to FrontTR, but with "left" and "right" included in the name, cause the problem is on both sides of the aircraft, i.e. 2 opposite numbers.

Hello, guys, need a little guidance. I am trying to make me a Bulgarian Air Force skin, but I am facing certain difficulty with the numbers. Please see the picture below: The number should cover also the front part of the main landing gear hulls. I wonder what is the mesh name for that part? Thanks and Best Regards, Svetlin

Sharks of the Black Sea

My first attempt at making decals plus minor ini-editing:

Thanks, Spinners, I'll try again using your advice. Thanks again. ========================== It worked!!!! Million thanks

Hello guys, Could anyone of the experienced decal makers take a look at the picture and share a piece of advice as to how to remove those nasty white lines that appear from the decal? Also why do these appear at all? I have followed decal creating procedure given the the KB. Thanks! Best Regards, Svetlin

Great, man, thanks a lot. So it's hard evidence now, there's a true MiG-29M in the pipe. Impressive!!! Best Regards, Svetlin

Hm, that's strange, it's been a while and not a single word from anyone about that thing in the picture Silverbolt, may I ask for one more pic of "the thing", from a different angle?

Hi there! IIRC, while WOE is installed, there was a question if one wishes a clean WOE install or merged WOV/WOE install. Choosing a merged WOE/WOV isntall should give you in WOE access to airplanes available in WOV, but missing in WOE (such as the F-4B for example). Best Regards, Svetlin

Yes, it can - unguided only. Besides that it could fire Kh-23 guided air-to-ground missiles and R-3/R-13 IR air-to-air missiles. No radar on board...

Navy hasn't yet, but someone else has:

I feel sorry for them... They really have no idea what they're missing...

Leaving the new aircraft aside, I mostly appreciate the updated pits. Man, the only way to get me out of the Jag's pit now, is to blow me out of it

Well, first things first

Hope that pilot goes together with the cockpit from your photo Of course wouldn't mind a set of wings, couple of engines attached as well...

Nice!!! Just a question, can anyone help me find the place on the template where the nose section of the Su-30 is painted? I'd like to repaint the Su-30KN nose to dark grey...

:good:

Great job, lindr2. Further to what Blackbird said earlier, is it possible to slightly extend the side front ends of the dorsal add-on, which you are making, to wrap the sides of the cockpit area? I think this way you will improve the basic model, because the original "fuselage" of the model seems too thin in the cockpit area. Well, that's just my opinion...

For the real thing, follow the link: http://www.airwar.ru/enc/bww1/k7.html (text in Russian, you'll need a translator). P.S. Your link shows a what-if model based on the K-7 plane of Russian constructor Kalinin.

Hi Erwin_Hans, Su-27SM is still in BETA Version, I know that well and so I hope you will not mind my comment. At the moment, the weapons pylons on the wings seem to be positioned a bit too much to the back end of the wing. Also the pylons seem a bit too short and thick. I think that issue is already solved on the Su-30MKK BETA, so I hope your Su-27SM will get the same good treat Respect, Svetlin

Thanks a lot! Svetlin