Fdino

Hello Gepard and Wrench! How are they? It really is funny. But, if we take this chicken or egg approach, we will come to the conclusion that it was the egg laid by the non-avian dinosaur,. Now it is interesting that you mention this because it reminds us of trying to apply cladistics to warships. If we think about this approach, is the A-10 totally unusual, something that we would consider as an evolutionary novelty?

Hello friend. I entirely agree with your point of view. By the way, what you wrote is what I read most of the time. It is no exaggeration to say that the aircraft came first, precisely because, at least from what I read, the requirement for a CAS aircraft to have been made first. I think the cannon was added later. So much so, that they studied many existing attack aircraft, including those from World War II to be able to produce a good CAS aircraft. Yes, there was the thought of making a turboprop aircraft but then they changed precisely because of fragility. So, I believe the aircraft has been modified to accommodate the cannon and tub. The landing gears have also undergone change, including the landing gear near the nose that is not positioned exactly on the centerline. The position of the engines also I think has changed due to the move to lower the infrared signature.

Hello friend. I confess that I've read many references about the A-10 Thunderbolt, including Bill Sweetman, Ken Neubeck and Peter C. Smith. You've read their book. But I like to read articles on the internet that explain about the aircraft.

Hello. Would you like to know what is true? When researching the A-10 Thunderbolto II, some sources say that it was built around the cannon. Others say no. So which came first, the cannon or the aircraft? Thanks and very wishes.

Seeing the desktop screen in this video made me nostalgic for my old PC, when I used to run these simulators and other PC games. JSF, F-22 Raptor, F/A-18 Korea (Yes, I have this one to), F-15 Strike Eagle, Oddworld: Abbes Odyssey, Duke Nukem, how many I played...

AWESOME!!!!!!!!!I loved this simulator so much. I can't wait to see how this remastered turns out. Congratulations to you all! I still have the CD here with me, along with other simulators like these that were released back then. Very wishes wingmans!

Hello air friends, how are you? I was studying the F-14 Tomcat. I love learning about the engineering of this aircraft. However, I saw that Iran also acquired the aircraft during the Shah Pahlavi era. How many F-14s does Iran still have (or if it still has any)? Thanks very much.

Hi! Thanks Erik. It's a good solution. I take this opportunity to wish you all a Merry Christmas and thank you for the excellent work and mods you have all been doing.

Awesome!

Hi +MODDER. How are you? I had guessed as much. Because I never managed to see any difference when we destroyed them. Often they're near a radar. When I target the radar and one of them survives, it doesn't make a difference either. I think they're only worth points. Thank you.

Hi everyone, how's it going? I was flying around in Strike Fighters when I came across, as I almost always do, a BRDM Reccon Car and a Zil-157 Command. What is the function of these units in the game? Do they give enemies greater range or something else? Thanks for your attention and best wishes!.

Hi friend. Yes. F-2 is a good fighter. Its production cost was too high. And this has caused Japan to reduce the number of jets to be purchased. I'm still thinking about buying a plastimodel of him to assemble.

Hi Acaria! I'm interested in the composite material that coats the aircraft, contributing to its strength and plasticity against physical forces, as well as its low radar signature. I'm also interested in the aircraft's aerodynamics and its manufacturing process, which, let's face it, was quite turbulent. The F-2 intrigues me as much as the F-14 and the A-10. I believe they are marvelous aerospace engineering models that could have other applications.