CA After Dark and WOFF

[+Erik]

I'll check into this, thanks for the report. Ill get back to you.

[+Erik]

@Menrva

The white background was exactly what you thought it was, html coding in the description and version information. I've corrected this for all files so we don't have this happen again. In the future with your new powers you can probably edit those fields in html so I'd just ask you not copy paste into the editor unless you want to the use "Source" button and view the BBCode to remove the HTML from it. Mistakes can happen and if they do just contact me. In regards to changing the CSS that wouldn't work because it's rendered before the text so if the text has HTML in it that's what becomes the final rendered version in the browser. The text associated to the files wins every time.

As for the images yes the format changed but I want the new format, the old squares were too small and didn't do justice to the files and all of the hard work. I'm proud of you guys and I like to show off your work. I haven't seen any images that look horrible, yes some are marginally different but they aren't horrible. I also think our new image format lends itself better to the more common widescreen formats we see screenshots taken in. It used to be the old monitor resolutions prevailed because they were more predominant but in 2026 widescreen is more predominant. If you see something you absolutely hate in the images point it out. I'm not adverse to reviewing anything you see and fixing it. The rendered white background was an awesome catch and was in more files than just yours, 1381 of them to be exact.

Let me know your thoughts boss and I'll get to work.

E