Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

i was dorking around on the computer as one normally does when bored and stumbled across something that really got my attention...the MBB Lampyridae. Designed to be a missile fighter for Germany in the 80's, it is said to have had a RCS less than that of the F-117. i managed to find a 3-view* and very few other pictures. i think it looks very similar to the f-16 and could maybe have very similar flight characteristics. has anyone else seen this thing?

 

 

*it is a large picture.

post-8419-1230765630_thumb.jpg

Posted (edited)

Here's a couple of links on the aircraft. I think it was just a technology demonstrator, as it was too small to carry any useful ordinance.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBB_Lampyridae

 

http://www.f-104.de/exponates/english/exp_...yridae_eng.html

 

http://www.janes.com/extracts/extract/jawa/del00876.html

 

http://www.rp-one.net/lampyridae/lampy.html

Edited by Mladuna
Posted
You can make any claims you want about a plane that was never built. :wink:

 

AFAIK, the RCS was measured in a full-scale mockup and was better than the F-117, even though at those levels, better is always very relative since almost any "damage" (up to getting the plane "coated" by pigeons :biggrin:) during operations will change the RCS dramatically for worse. The best mantained and operated plane would have been the stealthier.

Posted

I highly doubt that the RCS was better than a '117's...look at that tall, flat vertical stab. No stealth design has one. Also, by the early 1980s, low observable technology had progressed away from faceted surfaces to the conformal designs that one sees in the B-2, F-22, and the F-23.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..