Teras Posted September 25, 2011 Author Posted September 25, 2011 gotcha thanks buddy , im optimizing it for SF2 now Quote
Teras Posted November 4, 2011 Author Posted November 4, 2011 progress status yes i know im late for the news , i decided to remodel a lots of parts in models since i wasn't happy with the results so i remodeled almost half of the jet in the E block and the same will be with the F block f-16 block 70E model 88% done while the block 70F model still on 70% done f-16 block 70E new les RCS nozzle & engine model done new intake model done new fuselage & airbrakes done new vertail & rudder with all its details done some details had been modified in the nose all new landing gears 99% done ( new tires left only for 100% ) all new wings , flaps , slats done all new lights systems all new electronics systems ( ECM , IFF ... etc ) the skins will be out soon note : all of our f-16s models not 100% skinned so those skins for test only that means the actual skins not yet done and the model not 100% uvmaped in these 2 weeks E model will be 100% ready for the ini coding and uvmapping after that we will talk about the big boy ( F model 2 seater ) ah yes the CJ model will be the last thing since it needs new vertail cockpit works will coming up soon ( well my brother offered a help ) always feedback are welcomed teras Quote
Muesli Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Hi guys! Is it me, the screenshots? I have the feelings some proportions are not quite..... in proportion... Can't put my finger on it, something feels wrong. Sorry, don't wanna offend but maybe there have been changes in the real life 16s I am not aware of. Cheers Quote
Teras Posted November 4, 2011 Author Posted November 4, 2011 hi muesli no , there are nothing wrong in the model i just checked it 3 times and compared the model on 3 view blueprints and it is okay i thought the same but it appears that is skin issue , i conform this and i'll post some more rendered model screens without skin skin and uvmapping will defiantly change the look of this bird all sides render Front & back view & Top & bottom view & Right & left view & normal user view btw , check those pics for block 70 models in HAL if there is any thing wrong in the model please tell me 1 Quote
squid Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 keep up the nice work man do you have maybe renders on lighter background ? a light grey if possible, and of higher resolution ? Shots from angle , it will be easier for me for evaulation to see perspective view :) Quote
+Spillone104 Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 At first sight I would say that the nose and maybe the canopy don't look the same as an F-16. but it seems from renders that the block 70 have this things different from a standard Fighting Falcon. Quote
+Heberth Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 IMHO there is no problem with the F-16. maybe the FOV on the screenshots give an wrong "feeling" of the size... Quote
EricJ Posted November 5, 2011 Posted November 5, 2011 Screen resolution settings sometimes screw up pics... from the model renders looks okay to me. Quote
Teras Posted November 5, 2011 Author Posted November 5, 2011 @ spillone block 50/52 & 60 & 70's noses are different than the old vipers due to aesa radar , the aesa radars noses looks smaller and shorter we used block HAF block 52 c&d blueprints 3 views to model the nose and the cockpit and the fuselage @ ericj see the tires below i made new ones btw nobody noticed the back side! well i did and fixed it immediately instead of that i have new upgrades and will talk by pictures! Front & back & Top & bottom & Right & left & Normal user view ( NUV ) waiting your feedback... 1 Quote
Derk Posted November 5, 2011 Posted November 5, 2011 Looking at he pics (the last ones are already a great improvement as far as I feel it), maybe the bulged tailbase could be slightly less rounded i.e. somewhat more squared towards the top and a little bit more slender towards the end . This is in fact pure "whining" but it is a matter of feeling i.e.perception: small details like this CAN make a difference in the total impression of what is otherwise an absolutely AWESOME :good: model !!! Houdoe, Derk 1 Quote
MigBuster Posted November 5, 2011 Posted November 5, 2011 @ spillone block 50/52 & 60 & 70's noses are different than the old vipers due to aesa radar , the aesa radars noses looks smaller and shorter we used block HAF block 52 c&d blueprints 3 views to model the nose and the cockpit and the fuselage Only the Block 60s have AESA (AN/APG-80) - and maybe any Block 70 would have had. The Block 50/52 has AN/APG-68 versions currently until any future SLEP How does the model look without the CFTs? Quote
EricJ Posted November 5, 2011 Posted November 5, 2011 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/GENERAL_DYNAMICS_F-16_FIGHTING_FALCON.svg I'd say offhand Teras 50% thicker on all the wheels... Quote
Teras Posted November 5, 2011 Author Posted November 5, 2011 Only the Block 60s have AESA (AN/APG-80) - and maybe any Block 70 would have had. The Block 50/52 has AN/APG-68 versions currently until any future SLEP How does the model look without the CFTs? oooops , sorry for mistaken i meant block 60&70's noses are different than the old vipers noses due to AESA radars this is block 60&70 project so AESA included block 60&70 comes with CFTs , so clean model ( without CFTs ) will not be included as block 60&70 but in the future after releasing those birds i will work on f-16 b52 CJ wild weasels using the same models with some modifications also there are the CJ model's screens in the previous pages Quote
Teras Posted November 5, 2011 Author Posted November 5, 2011 okay , how about now eric? modified it according to this Quote
MigBuster Posted November 5, 2011 Posted November 5, 2011 (edited) block 60&70 comes with CFTs , so clean model ( without CFTs ) will not be included as block 60&70 but in the future after releasing those birds i will work on f-16 b52 CJ wild weasels using the same models with some modifications also there are the CJ model's screens in the previous pages Probably easier to do a single model I suspect - for the record though they dont always wear them F-16E Block 60: Edited November 5, 2011 by MigBuster Quote
MigBuster Posted November 5, 2011 Posted November 5, 2011 (edited) Does the front of the CFTs need to be a bit higher? Also the air intake front might need a reshape Edited November 5, 2011 by MigBuster Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.