Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
VonBeerhofen

OHKA prototype

Recommended Posts

Derived from my Reichenberg and still carrying some of it's details but with a fully working Rendering Sequence. There is a pilot inside too but I couldn't use the Reichenberg's tranparency file but he's in there. The skin is largely from the Reichenberg with a white overlay and all colors removed from the plane and a quick Nippon dot replacing the German insignia. Later a proper skin with proper shading will be added but first the model needs to be tweaked so all V1 details are properly adapted to get the model as it should be. Notice that the model has 8 sides, like my Reichenberg, giving it a rounder shape then the stock V1. Couldn't squeeze more out of it due to the model's small size which limits the circumference of a circle polygon. However large planes can use this technique too and may be able to use 10 or 12 sides.

VonBeerhofen

OHKA1.jpg

OHKA2.jpg

OHKA3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've created this protype to have a flawless plane from which other planes can easily be derived and which is cheap in terms of nodes, polygons and framerates, yet just a little more interesting then what stock planes provide. It's also been a study of the issues you see on many other planes created for EAW and how to prevent problems. It's a single 3DZ which consists of 132 nodes and 163 polygons and I've made it more elaborate then it needed to be, which just was more of an accident but very illuminating nonetheless. It showed me how to make modifications to existing planes and tweak them without significantly altering the R/S.

As I said it's a prototype but a very important one because you just can not alter planes which are inherently flawed without solving these flaws first. This model has no flaws whatsoever, has more polygons then it needs and adding or deleting polygons and reshaping the model is a piece of cake for those who understand the R/S.

During the build I encountered about 10 different shapes, each one slightly deviating from the base model but still totally flawless and I hope to turn them into the planes I've admired for a long time. To show what's possible here's one modified version, it's not an OHKA yet but reshaping the tail and keeping the R/S intact is not going to be a problem. Turning the  canopy into a bubble version is a bit harder I think but since it's a flawless base shouldn't take too long.

VonBeerhofen

PROTO4.jpg

Edited by VonBeerhofen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest version has the canopy correct, as well as general outlines of the A/C.  Any number of pix of the A/C on the web, for reference.  the rocket-powered version was, IIRC, never used.  Glider version was used. to indifferent effect. 

Initial attempts to use this A/C, launched from twin-engine Japanese bomber aircraft, were mostly failures, as the bomber was usually detected, at long range, and shot down long before the release point of the suicide A/C.  Some of the initial suicide GLIDING bombs made it, and were devastating when they hit, which was seldom.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Canopy got revised, the front side panels were canted backwards and the sidepanels are now more accurate. It's not entirely right yet as I'm still using the Reichenberg drawing for the canopy but I want a more round collar all around instead of the squary look. Also added a crosshair reticule. The wing still needs a bit of work for control surfaces, a smaller wing is opional and only requires the removal of 4 polygons. Will also try to get the nose more round (less pointy).

VonBeerhofen

OHKA0.JPGOHKA1.JPGOHKA2.JPGOHKA3.JPG

 

Edited by VonBeerhofen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The summum of EAW roundess and perhaps a bit over the top which i think can't be further improved. I know, I know, it's been said before but all I wanted to learn was how to fix all the flawed planes I've seen throughout 20 years of playing this game and I think I found a fair number of solutions. Not that I'm going to fix all of em, only the one's I need. The Ohka is not EAW's toughest plane to create and there's always room for improvement but I'll only make the canopy rounder in the texture and match the nose, which is actually the exhaust of the V1 ramjet, and that'll be it, at least for now. Time to move on!

VonBeerhofen

OHKA00.JPG

OHKA01.JPG

OHKA02.JPG

OHKA03.JPG

 

Edited by VonBeerhofen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks pretty good VB,,One question are there any guns on that puppy or is it just a flying bomb as in kamikaze like a flying V-1

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russ it can be anything you want it to be, what would you like? I'm thinking to have one as an ordinance file so it can be fired like a rocket and another one as a flyable plane, with or without guns. Ofcourse guns are a bit more fun. In EAWPRO a plane can also be set as a none flyable AI in which case it will behave as the V1 and plummet onto the target in an intercept mission.

Just couldn't help it but I had to add the front- and backview of the pilot so he's visible from all angles.

VonBeerhofen

OHKAPILOT1.jpg

OHKAPILOT2.jpg

Edited by VonBeerhofen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Vb as Bob said it was a flying bomb and not a fighter I would sure hate to be on a carrier with one of these boring down on me..for sure it's one mean machine and the pilots had more chestnuts  than I have

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, sure was a devastating weapon. Don't think any weaponised versions were actually designed. In ECA panel it was supposed to be a rocket fired projectile. Perhaps I can do something special with the rocket routine to make it more interesting, no promises as usual. As AI they're not designed to fight and my changes to it merely make em fly around. They do attack but they have very little steering capabillity. Not sure if it's in the FM that Theo created for the Reichenberg. Will keep experimenting with it and see where it goes. Sofar it's only been about creating a good working 3D model plane but as usual it's just the beginning of the story. As RiBob mentioned, it has no problem to create a spectacular explosion, :)

VonBeerhofen

Edited by VonBeerhofen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There seems to have been a weaponised version, MXY7 type 11-26 which I came across in a Japanese model building kit. The above version is simmilar to it in shape but has a narrower wing with a canon? in the left wing. Another version with the wider wing was found at Okinawa and the nose of it is sleeker so I modelled that one as well.

OHKA_26_11.JPG

VonBeerhofen

 

Edited by VonBeerhofen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This link has some valuable info and pix, not the least of which is proper nomenclature, and descriptions of the various types, both built and planned: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yokosuka_MXY-7_Ohka

Note that the ""Suzuka-24" (Japanese designation unknown)"  variant had 2 x 2 20 mm cannon, and was purportedly used against B-29s.  

No idea if the pilot was supposed to ram once running out of ammo, or bail out in order to try again.  Note also that this aircraft, or at least some variants, were planned to be launched from land and sea platforms, as well as the initial air-launched variant.

The pix contained in the link will, I hope, prove useful. 

 

image.png

Edited by RIBob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As submitted elsewhere, if it is desired to have a shorter, rounder nose on any of these flying bombs, perhaps the modder could use the nose of a torpedo.  should be ideal for some variants which sported stubby, round noses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol. torpedos aren't very round in EAW RiBob and shapes can not easily be copied and pasted into a model. However there's no problem with shortening the nose and adapting the curve . I agree that it's a little sharp and needs to be more like the previous version I posted (picture was already deleted). I will match it to the exact shape of the picture I have later. Having more fun with the escort carrier at the moment.

VonBeerhofen

Edited by VonBeerhofen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, VonBeerhofen said:

shapes can not easily be copied and pasted into a model.

Not 100% accurate.

While you can't copy and paste elements from one model to another you can easily attach separate 3dz's together with hardpoints.

So you could null out the sharp edged nose elements and then find a smoother nose cone somewhere in the EAW universe and attach it to the front of the main fuselage. The whole exercise would take about 1/2 hour.

FWIW, the roundest nose cone 3dz I've ever come across is the radar pod I built for the P-82. if you want to try adapting that one, you can still get it at Talley-ho.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't sound as if it needs adapting. Roundest nosecone I've build is my 16 sided white blimp, which was called a fake. I'm sure you rember that one, :(

Anyway there's no need to use the described method with the 100% models even though the method is available. You can do anything with them, provided you have knowledge about how the rendering sequence works. As I said previously they can be turned into multipart models without the need to copy it's R/S and unused nodes and polygons into every part and tweak your heart out. The result are fast rendering clean objects which can use the F.3DZ as intended and every node and polygon each 3DZ can provide.

VonBeerhofen

Edited by VonBeerhofen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, VonBeerhofen said:

Lol. torpedos aren't very round in EAW RiBob and shapes can not easily be copied and pasted into a model. However there's no problem with shortening the nose and adapting the curve . I agree that it's a little sharp and needs to be more like the previous version I posted (picture was already deleted). I will match it to the exact shape of the picture I have later. Having more fun with the escort carrier at the moment.

VonBeerhofen

Just a suggestion, and I'm sure that you would know better than I how to go about it.  Bravo, and keep up the good work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention that that blimp was one of the first  100% models ever created back in 2010 and turned into one of the most memorable moments in my life :) All in all it turned out very well for me in the end, no hard feelings to the people involved, they never had any idea what it was all about, still don't.

It's all sorted RiBob, don't worry. Thx for the input!

VBH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, rotton50 said:

It's faster to adapt an existing nose cone than build one. No sense reinventing the wheel.

Perhaps.  I would have thought so, but I am writing from a position of ignorance.  Perhaps VBH has something else in mind.  

Saying that there is no need to re-invent the wheel is only a partial truth.  For example, once the pneumatic tire was added to the wheel, its' rolling resistance was greatly reduced, and the speeds at which it could be used greatly increased.

So, while not exactly re-inventing the wheel, some modders considerably increased the wheel's usefulness.

Let's see what VBH has in mind for a final product.  I think it only fair to evaluate a work on its final iteration, and not when it is in development.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By VonBeerhofen
      The Reichenberg was the first and last plane I created in 2010, but with some recently acquired knowledge I felt the model should benefit from it, hence II. The initial model had it's cockpit more integrated into the fuselage but pictures show it was more of a small cubicle on top of the body. The old version also only used 6 sides and now 10. It may be further improved someday but for now this is where it stands. Weapons wil be added later too.
      As usual a rock solid R/S, new skin, semi 3D pilot (as in the Ohka) and dashboard (not visible yet in this picture but it's already there).
      VBH

    • By VonBeerhofen
      In line with the latest weapons loadout expansion, which adds some 7 or 8 new selectable weapons to EAWPRO the FritzX guided bomb was created. The bomb with an 800 KG warhead was used in anti shipping raids and carried by the JU 88 amongst others. The plan is to use every available weapon slot and hopefully make em work too. The FritzX for now is a selfpropelled weapon with a high drop ratio since human control of guided missiles or bombs is not yet programmed in EAW, so it'll have to do for now.
      VonBeerhofen

    • By VonBeerhofen
      Using a very old texture design which used to be UHR (= 512 x 256) redesigned for standard texture size 256 x 256 in 8 bit. 3D model may still change as it was selected from my base library of models. Another one may be more impressive, you never know.
      VonBeerhofen

    • By VonBeerhofen
      Now playing in the EAW Launchpad, Operation Husky, the Allied Invasion of Italy. New true WWII railroad map (in yellow).
      VonBeerhofen

       
       
    • By VonBeerhofen

      A while back EAWPRO was called AFB (All Flyable Bombers) but I was forced to change the name to EAWPRO because Mr. Jelly released an addon with the same name. He also has a so called EAWPRO theatre meant for use in his version and one for use with OAW. Recently an addon appeared for SPAW named the Final Cut, a name which I have used for almost a decade for a work in progress.

      What's the goal of such actions, don't people realise that it will only lead to confusion and possible cross contamination of addons? What's created for EAWPRO will screw up addons which were not created for EAWPRO and vice versa. I have uploaded a SPAW_UPGRADE.ZIP (Special Air War) to my FTP site to demonstrate the danger, it is NOT for the SPAW addon but for EAWPRO and I hope people can imagine what would happen when this addon would be added to a none EAWPRO version. This addon is for the active Launchpad members only and should NOT be added to any other vesion but EAWPRO!

      Whatever the goal is, it's dangerous and detremental to the game and I advice people to stay away from such use. If you don't then you're knowingly putting people's computers at risk. The name The Final Cut has been used for an EAWPRO work in progress for a very long time now and the use elsewhere is pure folly, as everyone in the EAW community will understand.
      A simmilar warning like this was treated in another forum as a threat and got me banned for two months due to my poor knowledge of the English language, IT IS NOT A THREAT, IT IS A PLEA TO STOP THIS IRRESPONISBLE BEHAVIOUR AND A WARNING TO THE EAW COMMUNITY TO BE AWARE OF POSSIBLE CROSS CONTAMINATION OF ADDONS WHICH CAN POSSIBLY HARM PEOPLE'S COMPUTERS!
      VonBeerhofen
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..