Dave

The more you post then your status upgrades then the more you can download. If you becoming a paying member then the cap is lifted.

yes

Yes

SF2, SF2V, SF2E, SF2E Jun patch. That is it. Use any of the exe's you want. Install the F-22 to any mod folder you want. Just if you put it into the SF2E mod folder, then use the SF2E exe to use it.

I like the bright light!

Do not forget the Meteor pit too!

OMG those are funny as hell though. I love flight sim extremist who just cry for over the top realism. I mean if a sim doesn't work like it should, people got something to gripe about. I mean who wants a sim that crashes all the time etc. No one. Then you got the "OMG the horse power of this aircraft is off by 10! and the angle of the nose is wrong because it doesn't have enough rivets." people and they just kill a sim. Our hobby is so subjective, I mean no 2 sources are alike. I can actually give a damn if a landing gear shock strut is the correct shape. As long as its close, who cares. I am dogfighting in this plane, or moving mud, the shape of landing gear door that is off by a few inches, isn't going to effect gameplay. You got people like Bard, Stiglr etc, who may mean well but have no clue how to present an idea without pissing people off in the process. Then they are the same people who when you counter their argument, always say you are wrong. There is no middle ground with them. I have always found it odd that the naysayers are such a tiny tiny tiny group and think that the 95% of people who like a sim, are just clueless. How does that work? Also they are the ones who have flew the sim for about 15 mins, or do not even own, said sim, yet have the biggest gripes about it. How does that work too? We all want a good sim to fly, but to go round and round and round over why my sim is better, is pointless. I used to like IL-2 series, but just can't seem to get into it anymore. There are some that just worship it, good for them, have fun. I knew guys who loved SDOE, I hated it. I never went to their boards and trolled them about it. To each his own.

Well that is 8.05 MPH. I would think that is a good taxi speed. How fast are you trying to go?

I use an AGM-129.....

You set it in the option area when you start the sim. You either have easy, normal or hard FM's.

Not sure what happened to Ranger332. Man what a trip he was. Never thought of those 2 being the same person. Wait I have to give 05 some credit, he is smarter than Ranger332. Ranger332 was just a pure dumb ass. No they havent as far as I know. Diego isn't sweating it now though. Everyone knows that needs to know what the deal is. Diego and crew will get more into full swing when Crab_02 gets back from Iraq. I took alot of the YAP 1 stuff I bought and put it into SF2:V, worked just fine as far as ground objects go. I also used thier carriers to replace others in the campaigns. Works great. Crab and Diego and crew did a great job on the carriers. It nice to see the random stuff get used in a campaign. I been using eburgers mods and that is just great and its free. I got a CVAN-65 its an old model from here but its works fine. You want it, I put it into a campaign and it works just fine.

ARNie......

Yeah it was entertaining to say the least. I loved my stalker. He gave me a great laugh. He is here though under another name. He just thinks I don't know who he is. How many remember that douch bag Ranger332 and his website? "I'm a Ranger, I'm a Ranger, I took all the German F-4 photographs on Airliners.net. Wait no it was my wife, my bad."

Fix pack is out. http://forum.combatace.com/topic/49295-nato-fighters-4-plus-fix-pack-and-aaa-addon/

bump

SF2E merged install with SF2I

We know already. http://forum.combatace.com/topic/49220-oct-2009-b-update-for-strike-fighters-2-israel-released/

In the downloads section there is some video tutorials. Maybe those would help?

You start from scratch.

I don't know, its going to be alot of work just for a merged install. Maybe TK will do a patch for SF2:E to get it to SF2:I standards. Then I can see the shaders update. Right now we are working on the bug fixes for the June 09 patch. One thing at a time.

Um you guys misread. FC doesn't have F-4 Phantom time. This is a comparison to F4 (Falcon 4.0) not the F-4 jet. He is saying that: That is what he is saying.

They are pylons that WERE going to be wired for ARM's. But they decided not to use them. (They can be added if needed) However for the fun factor FC put them in there since it was tested like that for real. Trust me dude we research the hell out of this stuff and just do not go throwing crap in the for the hell of it.

No, you loaded 4 more AIM-7's that are supposed or be on the FAST packs. You either load 4 AIM-7's that fit on the outside of the intakes, OR you load 4 to the FAST packs, you try to do both and that is what you get. It be design to do either, or.

Well I will say this. I didn't adjust any weps values at all. C5 had a beta pack set up and I went from there. What the team did was add aircraft and fix campaign bugs. Other than that its exactly how C5 left it.

Yes they are nightmares.