-
Posts
2,123 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
28
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by dtmdragon
-
-
Typo: replace every GR.7 with GR.5 lol
-
View File Harrier GR.3 Trial Camouflage schemes Harrier GR.3 Trial Camouflage schemes. As part of the Harrier II GR.7 development a new two tone green and a two tone grey camouflage pattern were trialled on two of the RAF’s GR.3 Harriers. The Green scheme was chosen for the GR.7 as it was thought to be the most suitable in the low level European cold war environment. However the GR.7 soon switched to the grey scheme with the change to medium level tactics. Combatace fair use agreement applies. Instillation: Simply drop in your mods folder. Will work with the stock Harrier GR.3 and my GR.3 (82) Falklands War Modified: http://combatace.com/files/file/12988-sf2-harrier-gr3-82-falklands-war-modified/ Credits: Thirdwire. Wrench for the TW GR.1 Template. Nato Fighters team for the Harrier fuselage serial numbers. Enjoy, Dan (dtmdragon). Submitter dtmdragon Submitted 11/26/2015 Category Harrier
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
Version 1.0
115 downloads
Harrier GR.3 Trial Camouflage schemes. As part of the Harrier II GR.7 development a new two tone green and a two tone grey camouflage pattern were trialled on two of the RAF’s GR.3 Harriers. The Green scheme was chosen for the GR.7 as it was thought to be the most suitable in the low level European cold war environment. However the GR.7 soon switched to the grey scheme with the change to medium level tactics. Combatace fair use agreement applies. Instillation: Simply drop in your mods folder. Will work with the stock Harrier GR.3 and my GR.3 (82) Falklands War Modified: http://combatace.com/files/file/12988-sf2-harrier-gr3-82-falklands-war-modified/ Credits: Thirdwire. Wrench for the TW GR.1 Template. Nato Fighters team for the Harrier fuselage serial numbers. Enjoy, Dan (dtmdragon). -
I have been playing around with the Polish Mig-29 doing some Baltic air policing lol. But I to am not overly happy with the in game performance of the R-73 so I have been doing some research on how well it actually preformed. From what I have found it should preform better than the AIM-9L/M (wider FOV etc) and I have found a few references stating the west didn't have anything to match it until the Python 4 was developed. So in terms of SF2 the data.ini needs to be slightly changed to reflect slightly better performance figures than the AIM-9M and equal to the Python 4 (available in one of the Team Viper Israeli packs).
-
-
-
-
No problem, decals are all stock TW Lightning ones so you can select any RAF Lightning Squadron markings. Might do a RAF licence built Dart with a Sprey engine and twin 30mm gun pod. I tested the Firestreak and Redtop missiles in the Darts weapon bay but they are to big to fit.
-
-
Norton Antivirus and Strike fighters 2
dtmdragon replied to Spudknocker's topic in General Discussion
Years ago when I set my current PC up I researched getting the best performance out of it etc. I found out that Norton was one of the worst ant-viruses to have in terms of affecting game performance. One of the best is reportedly Avast (which also happen to be free). I made the switch and have used Avast ever since. I found that out from a Microsoft Flight Simulation X (FSX) forum in a master post dedicated to getting the best out of your PC to run FSX. -
Spinners are you hitting on me? Haha
-
God if only!!!! Iv'e often though to myself a version of the Tornado that was a hybrid of the GR.4 and ADV variant along the same lines as the F-15E Strike Eagle would make a good what if.
-
They used them for the first few days of operations and then ditched them for cluster bombs. The gun pods were extremely inaccurate as the force of them firing skewed thier attachment to the weapon pylon all over the place. Adding to that was the fact the software modification to display a correct CCIP hadn't been done. The best they could make use of the gun pod was as an area weapon apparently but like I said it wasn't used for very long. http://www.f-16.net/f-16_versions_article18.html Back to the 'what if' Fulda senario, what CBU would be the most likely used by the USAF in Europe in the late 80's/ early 90's? CBU-100?
-
F/A-16C Block 30 Fighting Falcons from the 78th TFS 'Bushmasters' engaging Soviet armored columns in the Fulda Gap.... Had the A-16 or F/A-16 gone into production it would have had one of the first versions of a helmet mounted display with its Falcon Eye system...
-
Very cool
-
Modified AIM-120C specifically for the F-22 and F-35 that drops from the weapons bay and then engages its engine. Had to make it not rail launched and put a delay on the booster start so hence had to make it station specific for just the F-22 and F-35. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVkqrkA8KnU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVbqiy77aeU
-
-
-
Nice find, the ausies were always a bit sore over losing their Skyhawks and then having to lease them back
-
AI flights, do they fly or appear magically?
dtmdragon replied to Stratos's topic in General Discussion
To increase your engagement ranges use the mission editor to move the waypoint directly before the objective waypoint five or so times as far away from the objective waypoint that game puts it. This is the waypoint you jump to when you time jump. Do it for every flight of aircraft, yours and enemy. -
Thanks wrench
-
SF2 F-8H Crusader, Philippines Air Force Pak
dtmdragon replied to Wrench's topic in File Announcements
Nice! The more SEA airforces the better! -
F-35A/B/C update pack coming soon... - Aircraft performance, engine performance, weapons capability, AESA radar performance, radar/ IR signatures, electronic countermeasures, EOTS system, textures/ markings... - Block 2B, Block 3i & Block 3F - USMC and USAF IOC
