Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That gun must've had a stoppage or some kind of malfunction. I'm thinking stoppage + cook-off. Since the nose gear is right by the main gun, if a round goes off in an undesirable place in the gun, it could very easily wreck havoc in there, probably screwing the nose gear over. Now if the nose gear can't go down, then he would need to land with the mains up. If he landed with the mains down, then the nose would have hit the ground and that sensor pod on the right side would have gotten wiped off easily. I take it those things aren't cheap to replace.

Posted

looks like a great landing in ungreat condition..a good pictures... but where were the cameras during the event?? :D

 

happy to read the pilot is fine :)

Posted
If he landed with the mains down, then the nose would have hit the ground and that sensor pod on the right side would have gotten wiped off easily. I take it those things aren't cheap to replace.

 

Pave Penny right?

Posted
Pave Penny right?

 

Most jets require a lot of power to taxi in this condition. Wally Moorehead (Lt Gen Retired) was part of the A-10 OT&E team and told me the aircraft was purchased to survive just such a conditon with little or no repairs to get it back up and flying. The retracted main wheels still stick out about 4 inches and a pilot with the right touch can land with the wheels up with little or no damage. This guy was evidently a pretty good stick. Titanium bathtub or no, I would not like to be sitting on top of a malfunctioning 30mm Gatling gun.

Posted

In reality, I think the pentagon is experimenting with the A-10's news runway delivery system. They are just going to pin 10 yard lengths of runway and have the A-10 drop in into place to speed up construction sites.

Guest Bounder
Posted
That gun must've had a stoppage or some kind of malfunction. I'm thinking stoppage + cook-off. Since the nose gear is right by the main gun, if a round goes off in an undesirable place in the gun, it could very easily wreck havoc in there, probably screwing the nose gear over. Now if the nose gear can't go down, then he would need to land with the mains up. If he landed with the mains down, then the nose would have hit the ground and that sensor pod on the right side would have gotten wiped off easily. I take it those things aren't cheap to replace.

 

 

April 14, 2008 1:27 PM

Anonymous said...

 

The gun damage is from an in-flight malfunction, not landing; this caused the nose gear, which is in close proximity to the nose gun, to to be unable to extend. If you look at the sensor on the righ-hand side of the nose, there are no scratches/dings, so the pilot was able to keep the nose off the runway.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..