Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Updated by Fake pilot metod

 

- New Fuselage fairing

 

- New outerwings (extended to 11.99m)

 

Ah roger that. Very cool. I will take a Sea Fulcrum please. :biggrin:

Posted (edited)
The K is my favorite Mig-29 and my favorite Russian plane.

 

OK! in this cause another pics.

 

!!!! more models in detail -> http://pilot.strizhi.info/photos/v/NPKB/1143+7/ !!!!

 

on a MiG-29K/KUB Factory

 

img_2439_lh.jpg

 

img_2379_lh.jpg

 

img_2382_lh.jpg

 

img_2417_lh.jpg

 

Mig-29K carrier model

 

p1000410_sm.jpg

 

p1000411_sm.jpg

 

Ul'yanovsk model

 

p1000358_sm.jpg

 

p1000363_sm.jpg

 

PR1153 (Mig-23A,Su-25K)

 

p1000374_sm.jpg

 

p1000375_sm.jpg

 

(Yak-141)

 

p1000419_sm.jpg

 

p1000420_sm.jpg

 

Var'yag

 

p1000365_sm.jpg

Edited by lindr2
Posted

 

 

May I suggest to treat the dorsal fairing as "pilot seat" and not "fake pilot", so that it will show when aircratfs are parked on airports?

There is thread form FastCargo, about this

Posted
May I suggest to treat the dorsal fairing as "pilot seat" and not "fake pilot", so that it will show when aircratfs are parked on airports?

There is thread form FastCargo, about this

 

// Crew ---------------------------------------------------------

 

[Pilot]

SystemType=PILOT_COCKPIT

Position=0.0000,4.339,1.27

PilotModelName=PilotRU

SeatModelName=seat_f-100

SeatPosition=0.00,4.239,0.84

MinExtentPosition=-0.25, 5.91,-0.20

MaxExtentPosition= 0.25, 6.99, 0.92

CanopyNodeName=

SeatID=1

 

[Gargrot_N]

SystemType=PILOT_COCKPIT

Position=0.0,-0.22,0.71

PilotModelName=MiG-29SMT\9-17_G

SeatModelName=

SeatPosition=

CanopyNodeName=

SeatID=2

Posted

I don't know, but why does it look like an E-2 and not an E-1, say?

They even have the heat exchanger in the same place, over the cabin at the wing leading edge!

 

I mean, no one can accuse them of being copycats for any of the fighters or bombers in the last 50 years. Even the Forger only barely looks like a Harrier, and the Mi-28 is only superficially like any other attack helo. The Il-76 is even quite distinct from the contemporary C-141.

The An-126 might be hard to tell from a C-5 if they had the same paint scheme, but this one would be very hard to tell from an E-2 aside from the winglets and the contra-rotating props that are far more common in Russian designs than they ever were in the West. I bet if it was flight tested they'd even have wound up having to add dihedral to the tail like the E-2 has, and maybe even more tailfins!

In short, it just looks like Yakovlev was lazy and took the E-2 design as a baseline and went from there instead of making a scratch design from a set of requirements.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..