Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

A question occurred to me that I hope someone here might know the answer to. The B-36, B-47, B-58, and B-66 all had 20mm cannon in their defensive armament yet the B-52 still used 50 caliber machine guns until the G model was produced. Why was that the case?      

Edited by KJakker
Posted (edited)

A question occurred to me that I hope someone here might know the answer to. The B-36, B-47, B-58, and B-66 all had 20mm cannon in their defensive armament yet the B-52 still used 50 caliber machine guns until the G model was produced. Why was that the case?      

 

My hitch in the USAF was spent maintaining B-52 tail gun systems.  All B-52s through (and including) the G-model were equipped with MD-9/ASG-15 fire control systems, armed with four .50 machine guns.  Only the H-model was equipped with the ASG-21 fire control system, armed with a 20mm Vulcan rotary cannon.

 

Early radar-directed gunnery systems had difficulty getting enough 20mm cannon hits to destroy a target quickly.  A .50 machine gun had a higher rate of fire than a 20mm cannon, so closely concentrating four of them in a turret created a kind of flying shotgun that would get more hits than a slower firing 20mm cannon. 

 

Eventually two things happened to change this: 

- Airborne radar gradually improved to where it could precisely, and continuously, track and hit a target

- The Vulcan Gatling gun had a higher rate of fire than conventional 20mm canons or .50 machine guns

 

The two combined to guarantee enough hits in a short engagement time.  At about the same time, improvements in air-to-air missiles extended their effective range beyond a 20mm cannon's range, so the cannons were eventually removed to save weight.

 

The flying shotgun:

 

post-39531-0-67233400-1441810760.jpg

Edited by Geezer
  • Like 5
Posted

My hitch in the USAF was spent maintaining B-52 tail gun systems.  All B-52s through (and including) the G-model were equipped with MD-9/ASG-15 fire control systems, armed with four .50 machine guns.  Only the H-model was equipped with the ASG-21 fire control system, armed with a 20mm Vulcan rotary cannon.

 

Early radar-directed gunnery systems had difficulty getting enough 20mm cannon hits to destroy a target quickly.  A .50 machine gun had a higher rate of fire than a 20mm cannon, so closely concentrating four of them in a turret created a kind of flying shotgun that would get more hits than a slower firing 20mm cannon. 

 

Eventually two things happened to change this: 

- Airborne radar gradually improved to where it could precisely, and continuously, track and hit a target

- The Vulcan Gatling gun had a higher rate of fire than conventional 20mm canons or .50 machine guns

 

The two combined to guarantee enough hits in a short engagement time.  At about the same time, improvements in air-to-air missiles extended their effective range beyond a 20mm cannon's range, so the cannons were eventually removed to save weight.

 

The flying shotgun:

hot damn!

  • Like 1
Posted

hot damn!

 

Exactly what I was thinking!

 

 

Out of curiosity, I'm wondering: When was the last time a B-52 had to use it's tail gun in combat?

Posted

Exactly what I was thinking!

 

 

Out of curiosity, I'm wondering: When was the last time a B-52 had to use it's tail gun in combat?

 

Vietnam, during Linebacker II, 24 December 1972, a Mig-21's downed. But there were a number of simulated tail gun kills in training up until the tail guns were removed. I remember reading that the crews at the time weren't happy about lousing the guns.   

Posted (edited)

 I remember reading that the crews at the time weren't happy about losing the guns.   

 

Yes.  Mostly it was psychological - you want a .45 in your hand if you are going down a dark alley.  Also, some Communist pilots weren't trained well enough to use their range advantage, and would close on the B-52, allowing the tail guns to get some hits.

Edited by Geezer
Posted

It is also a matter of redundant-layered defences, i guess. I remember a vid of a US fighter(don´t know if it was an F-15) wich had a hard time intercepting a B-52 because it would jam his radar, shoot flares "like a motherfucker" and keep him off guns range with his own

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..