BUFF

It seems that the main proponents for FF sticks mainly fly props whereas jet jockeys don't really care. Of course most jet jockeys are probably looking for more switch/programming options than most FF sticks offer so maybe it's catch 22.

welcome back :yes: but I'm not letting you near any of my PCs ...

It's still at least being offered for export sales.

Thought that you might be in the UK. I have a boxed (no DVD case here) original BoB c/w with manual. Can't see the keycard offhand but I'm sure that you can download 1 from the internet somewhere. Lmk if interested.

Very true but with regard to Starstreak & equivalent in the right circumstances basically means coming within engagement range on a clear day (I know that there is a thermal sight for Starstreak but I'm not sure just how visible an F-22 will be at night on thermal) which isn't necessarily that far-fetched a possibility imo.

$40 million per aircraft just for an upgrade seems a bit expensive (especially as presumably HAL's labour cost is below that of a western nation)?

the whole point of hypervelocity is that they are so fast that the target doesn't get the chance to take avoiding action e.g. iirc Starstreak has a range ~7Km but only takes about 1 second of flight time to cover that. It's laser guided so ECM & flares don't affect it. It certainly wasn't designed to shoot down F-22s but I'm sure that in the right circumstances it could.

I would put money on that they can be by 1 of the latest generation hyper velocity electro-optical/beam riding missiles like Starstreak if it comes within range of them.

I've just reuploaded the version that I have but it's an unfinished one - read the readme! http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autom...;showfile=5888#

BAE Hawk T.1 by RussoUK2002 View File Bae HawkT mk1A of RAF Brawdy Wales UK.Number 1 Squadron,TWU,(Tactical Weapons Unit,(Training)) By Me.Russouk2002@aol.com Contains....Hawk T/mk1A Hangar screen Loadout And is armed with... Aden Gunpod,Aim9`s,and Rockets,(which will be replaced by Matra rockets when made.For next release) Bombs are optional.edit the weapondata for your own choices.The Gunpod is an option in the loadout as in reality its not a fixed weapon on the hawk. Just drop the Hawk_T1A folder in sf\objects\Aircraft folder and Decal folder too,copy and paste contents of Objects folder in SF\Objects folder This is a very Beta Release as its not fully completed.It is quite flyable though. I am currently remapping the Hawk as the bmps are too small.And theres a degree of Bitmap stretching etc,tho not evident in game.But I know its there,lol...When 2nd realease is done ,it will be just a case of a new Lod and Bitmap Textures,and new weapons.The latter will be for the new patch\Weapons editor as its pointless doing them now when the patch is due. The FM is ok for now (currently being worked on). This release is solely for feedback soas to improve the airtcraft in anyways.Dont forget this is only my 1st aircraft released,so dont expect perfection yet...lol Drone was my 1st actual model and the schoolhouse for Major lee,which turned out well.was the 2nd.. I hope you enjoy flying the hawk as much as I enjoyed making it.Just remember Im no expert at data ini`s..lol Submitter BUFF Submitted 01/28/2008 Category Light Attack and Trainers

"The AAIB, sensitive to the needs of the industry including Boeing, Rolls Royce, British Airways and other Boeing 777 operators and crews, is issuing this update to provide such further factual information as is now available. As previously reported, whilst the aircraft was stabilised on an ILS approach with the autopilot engaged, the autothrust system commanded an increase in thrust from both engines. The engines both initially responded but after about 3 seconds the thrust of the right engine reduced. Some eight seconds later the thrust reduced on the left engine to a similar level. The engines did not shut down and both engines continued to produce thrust at an engine speed above flight idle, but less than the commanded thrust. Recorded data indicates that an adequate fuel quantity was on board the aircraft and that the autothrottle and engine control commands were performing as expected prior to, and after, the reduction in thrust. All possible scenarios that could explain the thrust reduction and continued lack of response of the engines to throttle lever inputs are being examined, in close cooperation with Boeing, Rolls Royce and British Airways. This work includes a detailed analysis and examination of the complete fuel flow path from the aircraft tanks to the engine fuel nozzles."

we will fight in the shade! ....

because the player can use them. afaik it only affects ag ordnance so intercepting big bomber formations & defending the fleet (in air to air terms) shouldn't be impacted.

The RAF/UK Army have a few as well.

title fixed

Not Farnborough http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_296

This is my guess (& I'm just as likely to be way off track): TK looks at what he imagines that will sell either to a wider audience (most of whom may never visit a forum & know what is available or whom don't want to mess around with adding/editing files) or what he can sell to a publisher as appealing to a wider audience. We know that he's not planning to go head to head with IL2/Falcon 4 (or indeed LOMAC). So, what gaps are there that you think that the general public might be interested in buying? Vietnam was an obvious one especially as he already had the F-4. Having decided on a scenario he then has a budget - so much for coding, so much for a new terrain, so much for new aircraft models etc. That's why he has always said that he would love to do some other/more aircraft, more features etc. but e.g. he only has the budget for a couple of new user flyables per new release.

from the AAIB initial report "Initial indications from the interviews and Flight Recorder analyses show the flight and approach to have progressed normally until the aircraft was established on late finals for Runway 27L. At approximately 600 ft and 2 miles from touch down, the Autothrottle demanded an increase in thrust from the two engines but the engines did not respond. Following further demands for increased thrust from the Autothrottle, and subsequently the flight crew moving the throttle levers, the engines similarly failed to respond. The aircraft speed reduced and the aircraft descended onto the grass short of the paved runway surface." btw it was the copilot who landed the aircraft.

Eurofighter pulled out in December. Interestingly the Swedes are complaining that the offsets being required from Lockheed aren't as high as those that they are being asked for.

current rumour is that all power & electrics failed & the crew glided it in ... waiting for real facts though.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7194086.stm http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaselector/check/p...wm=1&bbwm=1

http://game.amd.com/us-en/drivers_catalyst.aspx?

Joe recently did a review for SimHQ. He originally tested the analogue version & iirc reckons that it's a bit like TracKIR in that you won't want to go back to being without it.