Dave

That is it, I have now read everything. I didn't think it was possible but this takes the cake.

You 2 wankers are sick, get a room.

Asl long as it doesnt have core game files. i.e. the LOD's. But if its a skin repaint, retouch etc, you are fine.

Off all the things I miss, I miss my mind the most.

EW, gross.....

Yes naming conventions are more important than ever. KB speaks the gospel. Example: AGM-130C_IR is no good. The wep editor will reject it (and not tell you). However this works fine, AGM-130CIR. It will recognize that.

I put the pilots in their own folders and then put them in the aircraft folder. So my question is, does having a "pilots" folder in the "objects" folder work the same?

You know my Uncle Bob? WOW!

Sir can I please have a #2.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30840666 US Navy helo crashed too.

WTF are you doing? Just add planes like normal.

Yes it is the same Zur you are referring too. Long time friend and plane builder of the 3rd Wire series. (and a few other sims)

He had uploaded it but his zip file was no good.

ROCK AND RUIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks Otto.

There is none that I ever seen. There is no cheap way you got to have 3d max and a clue on how to model.

Sorry no details to give.

I think we have plans to port it over to to the WOE version of SF2. But first.....OTC....

You will be very fine with that set up. Very fine indeed. Also if you get both and I would, you get twice as many planes in the merged install. Finally most of us are moving on with our modding to SF2 and SF2:V. So getting the latest and greatest will be a big benefit.

What spelling?

Did you make a sep install of WOE? If you didnt, then that is the problem. Not trying to sound crass but the word was put out not to do this in anything but a sep install or it will cause you problems. To fix this, make a new install and keep it for DS only. As far as your HD goes, I highly doubt the patch had anything to do with that. I think your HD maybe dying.

Update, C5 has started the FM. After that I have to send it to ST0RM for a few tiny items. So thanks for your patience.

Erik has taken steps to make sure that doesn't happen. Even if they did, we got back ups for back ups, for back up in a few locations. We haved learned since the attack from the Chinese a few years ago. Remember that? I used to write for Avsim, many many years ago. I know Tom very well and this is just a terrible terrible thing. Sensless is an understatement. They have been around for 13 years and I see no reason for anyone to have done this.

Only to the end receiver. I personally though it was quite fair. I mean when I started flying that campaign. I had no nukes. About 5 missions into it. I got my new supply and nukes were part of it. Next mission I received an EAM stating that the Parani Air Force were hiding 2 nukes at that base and the use of low yield tactical nukes were authorized. We authenticated the message while airborne. It authenticated as YELLOW TOW 118, with target data to follow. A few minutes later the target data was sent via secure channel. The bomb nav entered the data into the AN/ASQ-42. After we acknowledged all data we were given the green light. We lit the burners, activated the ECM gear and screamed to the target. The warhead was only a 70KT type just enough to take out the field and a few around it but that was it. It was a good mission. The Russians haven't retaliated though because they know they got caught red handed with giving nukes to the Parani's. Still we are flying 24 hour missions armed with nukes as opposed to 12 were before. Also we have beefed up the CAP's around the base in case the Russians try a retaliatory strike.

No one has sorry.

As I left for duty today I was backing my stuff up, take about 8 hours.