Dave

F-22A Ferris Scheme by Hrntfixr. http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autoc...p;showfile=6016

I have the expansion packs Child v4.0. And he is right.....

Have any problems, drop us a line.

It worked for me.

Thus why I didn't go into details.

It was just the way we had set it up at the time. No reason really.

Glad the crew got out though.

To Jug 61 today. Happy Birthday

I voted for advanced because JA37 has some good points. We got to make it where anyone can play.

This needs to be pinned for sure.

No its not possible, you want the long explantion? Bottom line the debris is only effects, you would have to make solid debris and apply it to every plane as a damage effect and even then all the debris would have to assigned a damage value. So basically you can redo a lot of aircraft damage effects (that mean each plane would have to be re done), or you can get into 3d max, make a destroyed aircraft model that would show up after any plane is destroyed. (you have to figure out how to replace a model with a model in game without it hiccuping) In that, it would have to be able to fall from the sky therefore it would need a flight model. Also you have to think of the huge impact on a computer's performance. Because the model would not disappear it wold be there long after it has hit the ground.

I better let Wrench guide you he knows where all that stuff is and can help you as needed.

So what we may need to do it set the parameters to real world spec and post them in the weps thread and show people how to make adjustments accordingly.

American pride?

Or a chef that is a rat?

But it is not a guidance method, like with a control stick. It is a targeting tool to let the command guidance work in a heavy ECM environment. Big difference.

Because only a moderator can do it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23117428 First the schools, and then the WORLD....... MUAHAHAHAHHAHA MUAHAHHAHAHAAH oh, sorry.....

Nope it was a radar guided only. The radar could only lock onto one target at a time and it could direct all is missiles against that target. http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/airdef/v-75.htm

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23117045 Shades of the cold war....

Should be in the weps packs.

I didn't bother to look it up as I know it didn't have optical back up.

Was going through the weps pack and was looking up various SAM's and compared them to their real world counterparts. SA-9 In game IR Guided with optical back up Real World IR Guided with optical back up SA-15 In game Radio Command with optical back up Real World Semi Active Homing Radar with optical back up SA-8 In game Radio Command with optical back up Real World Semi Active Homing Radar with optical back up SA-6 In game Semi Active Homing Radar with optical back up Real World Semi Active Homing Radar with optical back up SA-3 In game Semi Active Homing Radar Real World Semi Active Homing Radar SA-13 In game IR Guided with optical back up Real World IR Guided with optical back up SA-19 In game Semi Active Homing Radar with optical back up Real World Semi Active Homing Radar with optical back up SA-7 In game IR Guided with optical back up Real World IR Guided I think this might help answer why sometimes chaff, ECM and or stealth might not work. I mean if it has optical back up, unless you cloak, you are a viable target.

I am not an FM guy so I am not sure how to fix it. But if we do find a fix, I will incorporate into the upgrades I am doing.

That pretty much says it all right there. If we could of, we would of. So in this case what the purpose of asking? But every time it comes up, yes we do feel like we released a less then polished product. These posts keep reminding us of that too. So you wonder why we get bent out of shape. Wouldn't you?