Dave

American pride?

Or a chef that is a rat?

But it is not a guidance method, like with a control stick. It is a targeting tool to let the command guidance work in a heavy ECM environment. Big difference.

Because only a moderator can do it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23117428 First the schools, and then the WORLD....... MUAHAHAHAHHAHA MUAHAHHAHAHAAH oh, sorry.....

Nope it was a radar guided only. The radar could only lock onto one target at a time and it could direct all is missiles against that target. http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/airdef/v-75.htm

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23117045 Shades of the cold war....

Should be in the weps packs.

I didn't bother to look it up as I know it didn't have optical back up.

Was going through the weps pack and was looking up various SAM's and compared them to their real world counterparts. SA-9 In game IR Guided with optical back up Real World IR Guided with optical back up SA-15 In game Radio Command with optical back up Real World Semi Active Homing Radar with optical back up SA-8 In game Radio Command with optical back up Real World Semi Active Homing Radar with optical back up SA-6 In game Semi Active Homing Radar with optical back up Real World Semi Active Homing Radar with optical back up SA-3 In game Semi Active Homing Radar Real World Semi Active Homing Radar SA-13 In game IR Guided with optical back up Real World IR Guided with optical back up SA-19 In game Semi Active Homing Radar with optical back up Real World Semi Active Homing Radar with optical back up SA-7 In game IR Guided with optical back up Real World IR Guided I think this might help answer why sometimes chaff, ECM and or stealth might not work. I mean if it has optical back up, unless you cloak, you are a viable target.

I am not an FM guy so I am not sure how to fix it. But if we do find a fix, I will incorporate into the upgrades I am doing.

That pretty much says it all right there. If we could of, we would of. So in this case what the purpose of asking? But every time it comes up, yes we do feel like we released a less then polished product. These posts keep reminding us of that too. So you wonder why we get bent out of shape. Wouldn't you?

Did that just for you my friend!

Really, I dropped a 2000 JDAM on it and it went BOOOMMM, made that noise too. I saw screw it and nuke it.

But it is all true...

Go for it man.

Well let us know. Because I am curious.

bump the ini's together and see what is what.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/movies/1...amp;oref=slogin RIP S!

They are saying that the UCAV's of the future will be totally autonomous. Pre programed and they go do their mission.

Very true, those pilots had 100 and 100s of hours in the Thud. But well over 90% had never drop a conventional load.

payaso Did it work for you at all?

Thank you ma'am. That was it. And I know what you mean, you just know.

But TAC in 1965/66 was not teaching conventional roles they taught nuclear delivery. They were the best at that, most had no clue on conventional delivery. TAC is the 60's was geared for a nuclear shootout, that was the only way they could get a piece of the budget that SAC was taking up.

My question wasn't because you were a female why you liked the Spad. Others jumped in not understanding. I mean what drew you to like it. My favorite is the F-8 Crusader, the first time I saw it in person I was hooked. It was sitting at the flight line at Hanscom AFB back in 1985. After that I have been in love with it ever since.