Jump to content

Flanker562

+MODERATOR
  • Posts

    11,847
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    62

Everything posted by Flanker562

  1. No offense man but you're joking right? I flew all around a good portion last night and got the radar on the RWR, but no lock, or launch. The terrain allows for so many exploits that I guess you have to fly high level to get shot at. Maybe if you add SA-7 teams or stuff more in the valleys it'd be threatening... And even then it's with the Air Defenses set to High. But don't me wrong brah, I was enjoying the terrain alot, and it reminded me of EF2000 I almost felt like I was back in Norway... Thanks!
  2. And its stuff like this that makes me happy, just more stuff to blow up
  3. Happy Birthday USAFMTL!
  4. Once the template is done, like general lines. camo pattern, etc. I'll release a template But then again it's easy enough.
  5. Been awhile for a reply... but yes here. Just that it appeared that they used the 'winder rails, they replace them and of course use specific ones. Anyways, it works fine in WoI though, other than the subpylon appears under the HARM LAU-88 rail
  6. More than likely in game mechanics it doesn't register as a "threat" and the enemy fighter doesn't jink or drop countermeasures (Yes I know an optically guided weapon won't even "think" about such a thing but talking about AI behavior, not real life tactics).
  7. hehe I guess nobody thought to try it out (to include me!), cool stuff
  8. Say again over, you're coming broken and very unreadable...
  9. Oh yeah it's great for that, it's not like I use it for knife fighting, so as always thanks!
  10. I know from a prior conversation USAFMTL, but the Sufa... is it just that heavy? Or is the amount of load exceeding it's T/W ratio? Doing tight turns is just seemingly.... not right.....
  11. Yeah but not so much skinning, it's getting the model applied with a map. Right now AmokFloo is of course busy as he is, and he said that for me to get it complete, he can get it into the game, but for the rest, it'd take months, and as you know I'm running out of that..
  12. Actually the GBU-39/40 SDBs work fine for AI, I was doing a CAS mssion earlier and it worked great (see piccie)
  13. Well so far AmokFloo has gotten the gear area redone, and hopefully next week I should be getting it texture mapped. Failing that I may ask somebody but if there are any volunteers...?
  14. The only thing AFAIK the ED team has been privy to is the Ka-50, Kamov was actually quite nice in helping out than more than expected for Black Shark. And please could you reduce the size of your signature image to something around what we got? That's just too big man.
  15. Exactly, the low level recon mission I did in a Kfir was harrowing enough, but with a wingman it would have been really worse!
  16. It's fun to fly no doubt, but it's definitey a beast. Last night I did an anti-shipping run near Beirut, and on the way back took a hit from either a SAM, or an AA-2 Atoll, and managed to neutralize the MIG-21 that was chasing me anyways. So I'm making my approach, and go to extend the airbrake..... not slowing down... extend go outside view and hit it in annoyance but landed safely. Bird's so good that I sent a message to USAFMTL "Hey man I don't think the brake works" Run a CAS mission earlier today and everything works... yeah..
  17. http://forums.eagle.ru/index.php
  18. Pretty realistic. However I remember reading one time that a true F-15 pilot laughed at it. Thing is, all the data they have is only open knowledge, and so on and so forth. Personally I have no fault of the sim (well okay, it's not as moddable as other games that's fo sho), so after spending years with it, sure it's not the greatest, but it's something, and prefer it still over most flight simulations. It's more high fedelity, than say the SF series. I like the SF series and it's improving, but so far it's preferable since I can fly alot of planes I'll never fly in LOMAC.
  19. Definitely so far the best for WoI, love this bird!
  20. He does a great job, but sometimes saying "Front, Back, and Go" does wonders for him But in all seriousness thanks USAFMTL, time to go flying.......
  21. Hey don't you mean "ex-interceptor", I mean how much sex did it intercept?
  22. Not only that, but you would probably AFAIK need AESA to target the ground targets as well. Warhead? You can get by with an EFP (Explosively Formed Penetrator) warhead, where it adapts itself to the target type (aircraft, tank, bicycle) in the terminal phase. Alliant Techsystems has alot of experience with that so more than likely they'll be part of the contract down the road. Least I'd use them....
  23. Well it's odd though, the French sent some down to Afghanistan awhile ago (forgot the time period) and Sweden is talking about the same thing supposedly, maybe to get their aircraft some combat use.
  24. No airman, you finish the Mud Hen first, then if you hurry up, you can maybe eat, roger? :smile:
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..