dast24

so. i think we will stick with this little beauty: and the sister ship: it is the Foch Carrier from the ultimate carrier package. and i think it fits very well. it is not to big and not to small i´m bad in giving names. (it was really close to getting the name "kickstart" so if anyone has better name ideas....let me know pics from carrier trials: i think i will include a campaign in the release or release one shortly after release. i´m still screwing around with the backround story. but it will be PARAN vs DHIMAR omly(or with LIMITED foreign support)

damm okay so i have to use a catapult carrier....dammed.

yeah it was/is a heart muscle inflammation so it was serious but now its getting better. one question does SF2 supports skijump carriers or only catapult ones?

sry guys work was stopped from 22nd August until now because i was in the hospital. but now i´m back in buisness^^

@Russouk2004: if you like u can use my work in your package, just ask ;-) or send me your mig-29 work and i will merge your work with my work. so we dont have 5 or so mig-29 packages ;-)

some alterations to the skin and added the Mig-29K Alamo Station on mid wingpylons. that are described in the Mig-29 Book from Yefim Gordon: Also Tests with TV and LGB Munitions are taking Place-->Added LP Station under the Right engine nacelle(like Mig-35) LGB-->only with Laserpod TV Bombs-->possible to use without Laserpod Lighting LP -->Interim Solution until correct Laserpod is modeled and additional CM dispensers on the Bottom. i´m also altered the internal Fuel values and Engine Setting. I will include (if i can find a solution) specific A2A Weapons with specific stationcode, because i will try to simulate the off-boresight abilities of the mig-29. the Missiles will be the minor problem. the bigger one is to find a solution that the shoot-cue for IR missiles will be shown way off center

test shots of R-27AE (ca. Dec 1996)

hm the "invincible" is not a option, because it was/is a VTOL Carrier. for fixed wing A/C a angeld Deck and Arrestor gear is needed

Carrier Trials(yeah i know it is the Nimitz^^) flying over the ocean...flying over the sea *sing* changed weapons back to SOVIET Origin(fit´s better)

yeah. maybe better. for paran. just need the carrier with new paint and a fitting name :-)

@stratos: very good question. next questions please XD i dont know for sure right know. suggestions? EDIT: if it is me the Ulyanovsk could fit

After the first flight of the Soviet Navy´s Mig-29K in 1988, Paran was interessted to obtain Mig-29k´s for there New Navy Carrier First Flight of the MiG-29KP was done in 1991. After passing the Tests Paran ordered 82 Mig-29KP´s the Modifications needed for Paran was done in the D.A.S.T. Company and the Paintshop was applied by Logan4 & Co. Pic´s from first flight: thx to russo and TMF for the modell

okay it is been a while, but i had to take a break^^ i will look over the shunar again and i will maybe create a Paran version of it. next on the list is a Paran Navy Version but i need help with it. i would love to add the laserpod that u can see on this pic of the mig-35: because the lightning pod glued on the mig looks strange. maybe one of you talented 3d artist can do one for me. it should be added via fake pilot methode

hey looks really great can you do this kind of skin for the mig-29a and c, please?

mirage4000? this would be a good aircraft for the Dhimar airforce.

looks nice i hope the rafale team releases the new ones as soon as possible

Hallo liebe Gemeinde, ich suche die 1. ausgabe der CBS. und speziell die Seite wo von dem Spiel Hellcopter die 3 Hubschrauber als CGI Render zusehen sind. Also falls die noch wer rummliegen hat bitte melden :-D

i doesn´t say you were insulting i saied ;-) so you cleared the situation with: so i´m fine with it. @Brain32: so true :-D

okay lets conclude: the raptor have to show his worth in combat. the worth in regard to "pushing the limit" and advance the technology is there. and it is a cool toy for the "big boys" it has a cool looking desgin with all baydoors closed. i hope cadeteBRA will release the new modeled F-22 for SF-2 as soon as possible :-D

@ Migbuster the mentioned DACT Example was a example for the for American arrogance(we are the best, we are the greatest, USA, USA, USA, go USA!) of some individual(not you, not dave) in your country about other countries or military hardware. the fulcrum were/are fine aircrafts in dogfight and the version 4++ mig-35´s are also masterpieces in WVR and BVR it was not meant to be a example what could happen with the F-22. i´m completely aware that the DACT is nothing more than "G" Training :-) i´m also no saying that your weapons are useless, but here and there overestimaded.(like air to air missile in vietnam yeah it is a old example but i think you got the point) i´m also know that it is not possible to transfer a f-16 to 5th gen but you can bring them to 4+gen and this could MAYBE more cost effective. the other side of the coin is that Russia or China developed 5th Gen Fighter AFTER the USA. maybe they had never done if the USA hadn´t done it before. yeah and make a guess why they did it with the AIM-120 and not in dogfight with guns or IR missiles.....correct (besides other causes that are not know exactly why he selected the slammer.) because DACT against the mig-29´s in germany does make one point very clear: do not get into dogfight with the mig-29

but if i remember correctly this is a forum were we can discuss such things and Gepard has a point.the text i quoted sounds a bit offense or snootily. only because he has done his duty in the cold war doesn´t mean that he and his thinking and knowledge isn´t anymore valid. from the cost effective perspective you have to admit i would have been much cheaper to not develope/build the F-22 because the "legacy" aircrafts are still very capable and upgrading these would have been much cheaper. or a new(stealth) mulitrole mass produced f-16 like jet would be a better choice for conflicts of the past (Irak 2003, Lybia...) but if i have to go to War. i would want the best tech avaible for my troops, because i dont want to fight fair. i want to win. and i would give a damn about if its overkill or not. i also have to say that the USA is a bit over confident about her own abilities and the technology much like that little Guy from austria and his "V" Weapons some time ago and if the US loose a conflict or fight it doesn´t happen or the other´s cheated! like the excersise against our mig-29´s against F-16´s they flew DACT 1vs1 and the flight was over after the F-16 pilot "killed" the Mig virtually but the fight process if the Mig kills the F-16. the F-16 pilots celebrated there Victories until debriefing... were thy learned that they were hit 10 or more times before they got the simulated kill on the Mig-29´s but instead to look what went wrong or what they can do about it they run out of the room like big babies crying that the have the better jets and they should have won EDIT: back to topic is it worth it. if i remember correctly ther was a plane called F-14 Tomcat it was also very overkill for it´s time and the Air to Air Victories in US Service are 4+? but that little Turkey was worth it because it protected the Fleet, Allies in Desert Storm and the US only with it´s presence and its Radar.

here is the link: http://combatace.com...ee-upgrade-pak/ it is for SF2 but there should be a version for SF1 also

double check it. espacially if you have more then one decal folder. and if the naming is correct i cant remember if its "decal" or "decals"

looks interessting