Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Let me know what kind of info you need on it (weights, fuel per tank, etc...) I'm looking forward to this.

 

Storm

Posted

Each of the CFM-56 engines has 22,000lbs of thrust. We've got no thrust reversers.

 

Basic weight for an R-model is about 120,000lbs giver or take 3K. A jet with the MPRS pods will add about 5K and an R/T (receiver/tanker) is about 123K.

 

The only thing I'm thinking is that the fuselage looks a bit too fat. Just my eye. I love her though!

 

Jeff

Posted
might be two things... first I am using a 24" wide screen monitor second the 3-view i am using is wrong :dntknw:

 

If politics don't get in the way (the sun will never rise on that day), the Grumman-Northrup KC-45 (A310), which won the flyoff competition with the Boeing alternative, will become the replacement for the USAF KC-35 fleet. Let's don't give up on improving the A310 mod as well, because it may be the only thing really flying amongst the two.

Posted
If politics don't get in the way (the sun will never rise on that day), the Grumman-Northrup KC-45 (A310), which won the flyoff competition with the Boeing alternative, will become the replacement for the USAF KC-35 fleet. Let's don't give up on improving the A310 mod as well, because it may be the only thing really flying amongst the two.

 

Well, yes and no.

 

The KC-45 did win the competition, but it's not based on the A310, but the A330, which is a significantly different aircraft. Also, for your mod, it shouldn't be too hard to adjust the power on the engines. ST0RM would know better than I would on how often KC-135Rs takeoff at max gross...which may explain why you feel the KC-135R feels 'underpowered'.

 

FastCargo

Posted
might be two things... first I am using a 24" wide screen monitor second the 3-view i am using is wrong :dntknw:

 

About the monitor, make sure you are using the correct aspect ratio in the graphics settings menu? I had some initial problems with my 22" screen when I first got it.

Posted
might be two things... first I am using a 24" wide screen monitor second the 3-view i am using is wrong :dntknw:

 

Looking at the model, it looks like it might be using the 707's fuselage diameter. The C-135 series used the narrower Boeing model 367-80's fuselage.

 

Other then that, looking great!

Posted
We've got no thrust reversers.

 

Jeff

 

I was not aware of that! Of course when I see them, they're only doing smash n go's..

Posted

Ugh I hate March AFB, cause it seems like the only time I was there was when I was deploying from there or coming back from a deployment and landing there. Lol

Posted
Ugh I hate March AFB, cause it seems like the only time I was there was when I was deploying from there or coming back from a deployment and landing there. Lol

 

 

Lackland is the gateway into the Air Force... March is the gateway into Iraq. :rolleyes:

Posted (edited)
better ?

 

kcskin.jpg

 

kcair.jpg

 

Very nice! That definately looks the part. Well done.

 

Storm

 

P.S. Do you need cockpit photos?

Edited by ST0RM
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..