Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Whats is the purpose of the dorsal hump, does it accommodate avionics or fuel?

 

Lazboy

 

ECM Gardenia + some fuel

 

Between frames NЗB and N8 the tank on 1400 Litres, and in a tail part, between frames N8 and N 10 - a tank on 480 Litres is disposed.

Posted (edited)
MiG-29K - Very nice indeed

 

MiG-29 KUB first SERIAL PRODUCTION fight 24.03.2008 (production-ready PROTOTYPE first public demonstration was 23.01.2007)

 

img_1374_sm.jpg

Edited by lindr2
Posted
lindr2, what was supposed to be carried in this spine?

 

Mikoyan%20MiG-29SMT.jpg

 

{This is MiG-29SMT PROTOTYPE}

 

I REPEAT AGAIN :

 

Whats is the purpose of the dorsal hump, does it accommodate avionics or fuel?

 

Lazboy

 

ECM Gardenia + some fuel

 

Between frames NЗB and N8 the tank on 1400 Litres, and in a tail part, between frames N8 and N 10 - a tank on 480 Litres is disposed.

Posted

Seems like almost all the modern flavours of the MIG and the Sukhoi go for the dorsal hump upgrade. Kind of off topic here but I wonder why the Russian designers have never considered the CFT approach (say F-15) for fuel coupled with the dorsal hump jam packed only with avionic upgrades, I mean redesigning the landing gear to make room for CFT's would'nt be that big a task would it ? Any thoughts/input from those who truly know aircrafts would be apreciated.

 

Cheers !

Posted
Seems like almost all the modern flavours of the MIG and the Sukhoi go for the dorsal hump upgrade. Kind of off topic here but I wonder why the Russian designers have never considered the CFT approach (say F-15) for fuel coupled with the dorsal hump jam packed only with avionic upgrades, I mean redesigning the landing gear to make room for CFT's would'nt be that big a task would it ? Any thoughts/input from those who truly know aircrafts would be apreciated.

 

Cheers !

 

Su-35BM & some others has additional fuel in Vertical tails, all modern Su versions, since su-27M (Su-35) is FT capable versions {PTB-2000 & PTB-3000 used}

 

All Mig-29 planes HAS PTB-1550 on Central pylon, this capacity FT cant' be Increased, due problem with using airbrakes & aerodinamic problems, early mig-29 ca't use on wing FT, because of insufficient strength of a wing, since 9-13 & with some export versions 9-12, this problem was solwed & 2 PTB-1150 were added.

 

СМТ is a project of modernisation, it was developed for modernisation base 9-12 at the minimum alterations of a design.

 

MiG-29K, KUB, 35 - is new planes with new wings & airbrakes & tails parts & air intakes {no gills on top parts}

Posted (edited)
Ah and Su-17/20/22 but only avionics without additional fuel in dorsal hump.

 

Not right! Su-17M3 & su-17M4 has new fuselage with big dorsal for get better view for pilot, not for additional avionics;

 

in Su-17m3 in dorsal also placed addlitional fuel

 

su-17 has - 2790 kg fuel

 

Su-17M - 2980 Kg

 

Su-17M2 - 3145 Kg

 

Su-17M3 - 4020 Kg

 

Su-17M4 - 3770 Kg

Edited by lindr2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..