+Dave 2,322 Posted April 7, 2010 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36208306/ns/world_news-the_new_york_times He won't make it to the end of this year. Traitor. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slartibartfast 153 Posted April 7, 2010 For ops like this I would rejoin the military... apart from the busted knees shoulders... etc... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+daddyairplanes 10,171 Posted April 7, 2010 good. tho i wouldn't have announced it until the predator had him in the crosshairs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Dave 2,322 Posted April 7, 2010 good. tho i wouldn't have announced it until the predator had him in the crosshairs The anticipation of death is worse than death itself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+CrazyhorseB34 937 Posted April 7, 2010 Some guy sitting in an airconditioned shelter in Nevada will get the kill. "Don't fear the REAPER... du du do du du"! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MaverickMike 10 Posted April 7, 2010 Wouldnt it be great to just turn into a vigilante and go and take this guy down with a nice .50 round from a barrett? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Dave 2,322 Posted April 7, 2010 Wouldnt it be great to just turn into a vigilante and go and take this guy down with a nice .50 round from a barrett? I love the way your mind works! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slartibartfast 153 Posted April 7, 2010 (edited) I was thinking more along the lines of a Car bomb like this... or even better exploding underwear...that way when his butt explodes his face gets to see some daylight before he goes up to the big guy and has to explain... a .50 is to clinical... But hey thats me Edited April 7, 2010 by Slartibartfast Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+JonathanRL 974 Posted April 8, 2010 Wouldnt it be great to just turn into a vigilante and go and take this guy down with a nice .50 round from a barrett? Why do you want to be far away? A fair shot from a G36K is what I would want. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UK_Widowmaker 571 Posted April 8, 2010 good. tho i wouldn't have announced it until the predator had him in the crosshairs He's probably already dead Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
serverandenforcer 33 Posted April 9, 2010 Heh... I guess nobody here plays any Modern Warfare 2. I'd like to come up behind him with a knife, and right before I slice his throat in the dark, I'd say, "Surprise!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Jimbib 741 Posted April 9, 2010 Heh... I guess nobody here plays any Modern Warfare 2. I'd like to come up behind him with a knife, and right before I slice his throat in the dark, I'd say, "Surprise!" You've got Ninja Pro on huh? Or are you going with Commando...? Decisions, decisions Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
serverandenforcer 33 Posted April 9, 2010 You've got Ninja Pro on huh? Or are you going with Commando...? Decisions, decisions I got Marathon Pro, Light Footed Pro, and Commando Pro. I use Cold Blooded and Ninja Pro for my sniper loadout. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ONETINSOLDIER 2 Posted April 11, 2010 Ok, time for me to play devils advocate again and stir the pot a bit. According to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STAES OF AMERICA, american citizens are garunteed a trial by a jury of they're peers before conviction and/or execution, when did it start being ok to condemn a man to death on the basis of an intelligence report by an anonymous official? Have we thrown that old piece of paper out with the trash? When exactly did congress say that we are officially "at war" and with whom? Or did that little rule get changed too? Gimme a minute to put my asbestos underwear on and let the responses fly! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
serverandenforcer 33 Posted April 11, 2010 Ok, time for me to play devils advocate again and stir the pot a bit. According to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STAES OF AMERICA, american citizens are garunteed a trial by a jury of they're peers before conviction and/or execution, when did it start being ok to condemn a man to death on the basis of an intelligence report by an anonymous official? Have we thrown that old piece of paper out with the trash? When exactly did congress say that we are officially "at war" and with whom? Or did that little rule get changed too? Gimme a minute to put my asbestos underwear on and let the responses fly! Well, if you are catalyst to terrorism, encourage/train/assist in attacks on Americans and/or against the United States, living abroad in our enemy's backyard, and have outright and publicly announced your disloyalty from the nation that you were originally from (a.k.a... treason), a peacefull and constitutionally respected solution will be at best extremely difficult. Not saying that the efforts should be exhausted, but when you force the hand of our leaders to take more direct action to resolve the situaiton, you're pretty much S.O.L. Guranteed, they will probably still put efforts into capturing him, like we did with Saddam. That soldier could have easily tossed that grenade into the hole and smoke that b****** to he11 and probably would have been congradulated for doing the job. However, he instead captured him. I think the situation here is that if this guy puts up a strong resistance when we move in on him, we have the green light to get on with it if pursuing efforts into capturing him will result in unnecessary loses. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Capitaine Vengeur 263 Posted April 12, 2010 Well, if you are catalyst to terrorism, encourage/train/assist in attacks on Americans and/or against the United States, living abroad in our enemy's backyard, and have outright and publicly announced your disloyalty from the nation that you were originally from (a.k.a... treason), a peacefull and constitutionally respected solution will be at best extremely difficult. Not saying that the efforts should be exhausted, but when you force the hand of our leaders to take more direct action to resolve the situaiton, you're pretty much S.O.L. Guranteed, they will probably still put efforts into capturing him, like we did with Saddam. That soldier could have easily tossed that grenade into the hole and smoke that b****** to he11 and probably would have been congradulated for doing the job. However, he instead captured him. I think the situation here is that if this guy puts up a strong resistance when we move in on him, we have the green light to get on with it if pursuing efforts into capturing him will result in unnecessary loses. Well, it would indeed be a better thing to take him alive to be judged. It would prove that you are still on the Light side (ie Constitution-linked countries), and not afraid of him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Dave 2,322 Posted April 12, 2010 (edited) Ok, time for me to play devils advocate again and stir the pot a bit. According to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STAES OF AMERICA, american citizens are garunteed a trial by a jury of they're peers before conviction and/or execution, when did it start being ok to condemn a man to death on the basis of an intelligence report by an anonymous official? Have we thrown that old piece of paper out with the trash? When exactly did congress say that we are officially "at war" and with whom? Or did that little rule get changed too? Gimme a minute to put my asbestos underwear on and let the responses fly! Oh that's easy, he a traitor. Traitors were and are executed. End of story. Edited April 13, 2010 by usafmtl Damn spell checker! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
serverandenforcer 33 Posted April 12, 2010 Oh that's easy, he a trader. Traders were and are executed. End of story. Uh... I think you mean traitor, not trader. We don't kill folks for the import and export of goods... unless it's from Colombia. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slartibartfast 153 Posted April 12, 2010 Uh... I think you mean traitor, not trader. We don't kill folks for the import and export of goods... unless it's from Colombia. Hey there's some damn fine coffee from that there country I know I seem to buy a lot of it... ooooo you mean the other export begining with C.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
