Fubar512

If you set the allowable weapon class statement to accept AHMs (Active Homing Missiles). any such missile meeting the specific attachment type, weight requirement, and service date, will be available on that aircraft. So, yes, the AIM-120 will start showing up after 1990. This is easily seen on the MiG-29 and Su-27, which automatically upgrade from Aphids and Alamos, to Adders and Archers, as they become available.

Really? "HeatSignature=" is coded into the sim, though presently only implemented for ground objects, as is the radar cross section statement. Aircraft have an 'RCSModifier" variable available, but the functionality of that was broken by SP4. TK has stated that he will eventually rectify that, and also implement the heat signature into the aircraftobject.dll

just a little something I've been playing with in my spare time http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autom...si&img=2758

That's because you've not modded the avionics suite of the effected aircraft to properly utilize electro-optical weapons (there should be a sticky on this in the knowledge base). Those aircraft were released before full-support for those weapons and their targeting systems became available (WOE & SP4). Edit, here's the link to the sticky on EO weapons systems: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?showtopic=11879 In the future, please try the knowledge base first. You'd be amazed at what you'll find there.

Both "noise" and "deceptive" jammers can be added as load outs (external pods), or internally. Be aware, however, that there's also a "home on jam" statement that can be specified as a guidance parameter for missile seekers IFF works, but it is presently limited to those aircraft utilizing the Avionics70.dll. Unfortunately, one of the drawbacks of the Avionics70.dll is that it lacks support for ground mapping/targeting radar (though the latter is really only somewhat useful in an anti ship role).

Finding the carrier: As in Real Life, the carrier moves. SF's code was originally written with fixed airbases in mind, WoV added carrier ops, but as you've discovered, they're not fully implemented, even with SP4. Perhaps TK will address this in a future patch, he has stated in the past that he might. HUDs: Vietnam '84 was released well before WoE and the SP4 updates for SF & WoV, so you're dealing with older models that use the original avionics code. The updated code allows for much more sophistication in the way of HUDs, Radars, and RWRs. AAA/SAM activity: The issue here is probably one of both individual model-data.inis for the SAM launchers (specifically, their in-service and out-of-service dates), and the dates that SAM sites are active in the VietnamSEA_Targets.ini file. Locate, downlaod, and install the updated SAM pack, which includes both SA-3s, SA-8s, and SA-9 launchers, all of which the Vietrnamese would undoubtedly had in operation during 1984. Feel free to drop me a PM if you require further assistance.

The B-52 is also in WoE.

Guys, this isn't rocket science. Yak-141, flight difficulty level set to "hard", my first attempt at capturing it on video: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autom...si&img=2742

You cannot be serious....

It sounds as if we're dealing with a lack of understanding of the realities of VTOL jet operations (at least as far as the Harrier is concerned). Factoid 1) A Harrier cannot safely take off in VTOL with full fuel and stores, even in RL. Why do you think the RN equips its VTOL carriers with "ski jumps"? If you wish to become proficient in VTOL flight with the Harrier, practice with zero stores and 25% fuel until you get the hang of it. Factoid 2) SF & WoE perform a fairly credible job of simulating Harrier VTOL flight characteristics, and that quote comes straight from a USMC pilot with time in type. In fact, he even pronounced Kreelin's model "scary-accurate".

Topic moved to the First Eagles Forum, where I'm sure you'll recieve an answer sooner than you would on the SF/WoV/WoE boards.

No, warships have no "loadout" per se, but their weapons systems have the same requirements as any other ground object. If the ships are equipped with guns, those guns must already be in, or need to be added to, the gundata.ini file, in order for them to fire. The same goes for ship-borne missiles (and the weapondata.ini), although most of them should already be inluded with the weaponspack.

If the ships are alraedy SP4 complient, you simply need to add them to your objects/groundobjects directory. Some might have weapons or guns that require editing of either the weapondata or gundata.ini files, for which you'll need the respective editors. One more thing, in order too have them available in a mission, you'll either have to create a scripted mission and load it, or you'll need to redefine them as a "cargoship" in their data.inis, so they would appear at random in a game-generated missions.

Veltro2K was working on a MiG-31 model, months ago, until he suffered a hdd crash and lost the original model. AFAIK, he is busy re-creating it: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?showt...35&hl=MiG31

To the best of my knowledge, the only turn-key Huey gunship comes with one of the YAP mission packs. Well worth the price of admission, IMHO.

I would assume that you're talking about a fictional loadout, as the AIM-120 wasn't operational until much later than 1986 (AFAIK, the first models went out in 1990). In fact, that missile project wasn't even out for contactor's bids until late 1987.

The answer's usually quite simple. Start removing everything you installed last night. The game should start. Then, add them back one by one until you find the culprit. Before you do anything, see if the game starts in instant action. That'll give you a clue. The vast majority of the time, the reason any of the SF family CTDs, is due to something that's missing from either a terrain, a model, a campaign, or a mission.

On RussoUK's hard drive It's a WIP.

They're not available yet. All three are WIPs (Works In Progress). with no foreseeable release date.

AFAIK, there will be one, but it's a ways down the road. For test purposes, I'm using an F-111 pit that I modded into a makeshift "fencer" pit. And no, it's for my personal use only, I cannot give it to anyone, nor include it with the model, since it's developer will not allow it.

Consider this: That GeForce card is now three generations old. We're currently on the 8X series GeForce. From experience, I can tell you that the SF-derived sims now require at least a mid-range GeForce 6x series (6600 and above), or their ATI-equivelents, to run properly with all the graphics sliders maxed out.

Sorry, neither is available as a digital download, yet. However, GoGamer does have this package, which includes SFG: http://www.gogamer.com/Combat-Flight-Colle...0VVviewprod.htm