Flanker562

-

More work:

More work, adding some more color (I may tweak the nose area as well) but coming along slowly:

Getting the nose setup. It'll generally follow the Su-25T pattern (of course adjusted for the particular airframe) for lack of imagination but overall will probably down the line be tweaked to look somewhat better.

And beginning the work...

Okie, tomorrow I'll start working on the A-10A/C Splinter that I used on the Su-25T above.

True the big ones just don't have that maneuverability that the -12s and -16s can do. Granted that is a bad profile anyway.... But if you can load JDAMs you'll get more play rather than LGBs all of the time. Amd those will work fine

Shit sorry for not answering man.... Usually the larger the bombs, the more pain in the ass they are, as I usually bomb from high up with -10s and -24s and not always low level (I don't always bomb with those, usually -12s or -16s). But needless to say start out farther out until you can perfect a drop with those bombs. And I'd suggest the Bombing Range to do that as well, if you haven't downloaded it already. It'll help you practice without distractions (other than the unnecessary escort flights).

Look at the file date man, this looks like a LOMAC file, NOT a DCS one...

Some MP stuff last night and letting the Heavy have his way...

Dude as much as I've trapped.... I'd be kicked out of flight school. I trap don't get me wrong, but never have done a "real" flight profile at all.

Well now that I've cooled off some more after I get done with some Arma 3 work I'm gonna get a Ferris A-10C done sometime.

Well yeah me getting banned over something that wasn't my fault pretty much shows that their moderation is piss poor that's for sure. But yeah there's I guess some "belief" that since its on WikiLeaks it's "Okay" and therefore who cares right? Well given I'm a US Citizen I'd have a lot of three letter agencies in my business and so on, so how that happened is how it happened, and so on. But I don't think it's a thing against modding, it's a reaction against possible litigation, which is a big concern.

-

Also by the by, got some INI tweaks from FANATIC MODDER who helped tweak the birds some more. Overall effect is that pitch is smoother as well as various other tweaks, to include some slat fixes. Radars are still APG-73 though. Here's the actual ini's (as well as the missing VFA-105 skin that somehow disappeared) but overall looks and feels good and ONLY the inis are in this zip, along with the "missing" VFA-105 skin. Super Hornet INI Update Package 2.7z

We act like adults? When? Where are they?

I know, but what happened is hard to wash off and hard to forget as well. But otherwise it'd be great if more established groups get to workin, I mean I have a thing for the A-7 (USAF or USN) in a small way as well as the Intruder, but as said, promises but no action, and kinda leaves us hanging.

Fair enough, and in my case (or team's case rather) when you got morons offering you to send classified data makes it real hard to move forward. I mean seriously do they think it's "cool' to do so? But anyway yeah, had that not happened it would have been in full swing.

I fly Normal, and pretty much good to go with that, as Hard is a bit too unrealistic even for my tastes.

My only curious question is how does it take so long even without using sensitive information? I mean before the Super Hornet project was nixed I was looking at less than a month to get a flyable prototype (the AI could fly it at least reasonably well) working. And even then back on SimHQ I predicted an FC level version with six months (man was I wrong, in a good way). So yeah okay, ED hasn't been much help given the lack of documentation but overall... I figured if we kept on trucking as they were, within two months we probably would have at least the E and F in a flyable condition to include basic weapons use and texture work done (even with a small or large list of basic liveries). So... Granted yeah okay, they got other things going but overall even that two week period we were killing it easy. So I don't see how it's so difficult.

I think it has to do with Russian culture as opposed to always just being a bunch of dicks, well... that's what it ends up looking like anyway...

Looking cool, going to be a target rich environment...

View File VFA-35 Line Blk II [Fictional] Much like the Blk I version, this represents a Block II jet, with appropriately changed tail insignia to represent a "change" and so on. Also can be used on the F version if preferred. Submitter EricJ Submitted 06/29/2015 Category F-18

Uploaded and awaiting approval.