sparkomatic
VETERAN-
Posts
1,993 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by sparkomatic
-
The DID Super Typhoon game? I liked that one also...very cool, especially at that time...of course, it is still ahead of certain other games in many other aspects...
-
"I Found Her"? Er...what have you been up to then? Lonely?
-
the only thing that impresses the "higher ups" in the post-Modern USAF is themselves...they have vehemently demonstrated that they, the GO-class (can I call them Barons or members of the royalty?), do not have any concern for the plebes/vulgate/heathens/unwashed/non-weapon-school-grads aint hatin' just livin'
-
IAF integrates miniaturized, long-distance AWACS
sparkomatic replied to BUFF's topic in Military and General Aviation
- relatively safe altitude of FL400...safe from what Ak-47 ? -
maybe you already had this discussion...
sparkomatic replied to sparkomatic's topic in Sci-Fi Simulations
So another excuse for Kirk to pickup green women-things? No frakkin thanks... On a different front, since this topic has become a bit of a tangent...DVD copy of ATHF 5 arrived...see you katz ! -
Which Sci-Fi film would you like to see made ?
sparkomatic replied to Syrinx's topic in Sci-Fi Simulations
Put me in for BattleTech and a movie with some semblance of Starship Troopers book...I mean that movie was "in name only" Oh...and anything with Megan Fox... -
Uh...hate to brake it to you...I personally downloaded it 1,690 times...kind of fell asleep at the helm there with the mouse clicker over the "download" button...oops
-
This forum is loosing its appeal...
-
2 F-15s collide in Gulf of Mexico
sparkomatic replied to BUFF's topic in Military and General Aviation
You are wrong -
The flight engine is much improved. Realy hacking away at the lite-sim label some people have given the thirdwire series. Good stuff. Well worth the money. Eh...didnt TK himself give it that moniker? So...anyone been sent against the commbuilding yet? Are anti-shipping missions working for both sides? Screenshots look fantastic! Many of my long enduring complaints are answered! I think this was covered already?
-
I literally pulled this from the READ ME FILE in the F-111 package... The varks.rar has the planes You will need Norman Knights F-111 Pit as there is not pit with this package. Get it here www.schmidtwerner.de Thank you Norman Knight for making it. Then paste that address into Google, which yields, http://www.schmidtwerner.de/products/e_f-111_pit.html
-
Ah, that fix works well for quite a few other ones as well
-
Future still unknown for 158 grounded F-15s
sparkomatic replied to BUFF's topic in Military and General Aviation
Yes -
Real forrests for WoE Nato2 development pics
sparkomatic replied to Stary's topic in Mods/Skinning Discussion
hmm...my rig choked on a ban of heavy trees, took it down to 2.1FPS, but else wise it was perfect...especially the cows! rig: 3.4 Pentium 4 HT nVidia 7600GS 256Mb with 1 Gb ram note that the only time the trees bothered it was when there were multiple bands of heavy forestation and after ALT-N "jump" -
Ah...now I get it...you (your honor) are using the Royal "We" pronoun...beg your pardon...
-
OK, now that is SWEET !
-
Hmm...silly question...but did you try re-downloading the file and starting over? Have (rarely) had some files hiccup during the download process...this may not be it though. Besides, the MF one is WAY cooler than the stock one anyway... :scout:
-
Hey, that's dirty! Eh...my command of Deutsch could be a bit rusty though...
-
- "efficiency cancelled" ??? I thought you were in the Regular CAF...are you in the Reserves? Must have been no AWACS airborne if they let you go...
-
Against? No...it is a game, and was used as such in this example... My, my...arent we sensitive? And us? Funny, did not see your name in the credits...what part did you work on then?
-
Idea about stealth in TK series
sparkomatic replied to 76.IAP-Blackbird's topic in General Discussion
Eh...are you certain that the game is modeled that accurately? I mean, again things like ground clutter and "notching" (yes, a pulse doppler, dont get started down that road with me) are not modeled, so personally I doubt it would be effective. This is a game, not a sim. But, please do not mistake me, I like the way you are thinking. But, to my ego-soaked opinion, it is like you may be trying to have Waterford Crystal at McDonald's... -
Now that is curious...have you seen (no pun intended) that with any other MF-release or any other mod?
-
How to make F22's weapon door automatic?
sparkomatic replied to JKstar's topic in General Discussion
Hmm...it has nothing at all with being new or n00b or whatever...the article in question was specifically addressed in the read me file included with the plane...the FAQ dedicated to the plane...and SEVERAL threads already So...to me, that is trying to be inflammatory under the guise of "I dont know any better"...hardly could one miss the discussion, so it would hearken back to the days of Stiglr and diefanboisim to me... Its like when a piece of heavy equipment has been locked-out / tagged-out and a person removes the safety warnings and ignores the WARNING signs and defies the Tech Order and gets hurt...then tries to sue for workmen's compensation... This fellow completely either blundered past every conceivable road sign and asked anyway...that is more like inflammatory than anything And then some people essentially called Column5 crass and insensitive to novices...FOUL FOUL FOUL...you are the one that is wrong...I have known Don for years now, and he has done more for the 3wire community than 99% of you combined...he has, if nothing, championed novices and gone out of his way to help people enjoy this game series even more. Furthermore, I completely disagree that there is a "disrespect for novices" as you say, in fact, QUITE THE CONTRARY, there is far more disrespect flung at people that have been partakers of the 3wire community for YEARS than for people that either can not read, choose not to read, or like starting trouble. Simply that. Explain to me how you see it any other way...just re-read (there is that word again) this post. Then go look at ALL of the places this EXACT matter was covered (and their posted dates) and tell me, WITHOUT committing perjury, tell me again that Column5 was being either insensitive, or disrespectful to a novice. You can not, save yourself the time now. And besides, seriously, listen to the arguments that have erupted from the F-22 release..."fuel tank RCS modeling" dudes, this GAME doesnt model radar ground clutter or beam tactics and you are worried about the RCS of a fuel tank? Bet it aint even there... And then the dozens of "how can they shoot me if I have stealth?"...you do not understand STEALTH...period. Had I released the F-22, then the damage boxes would have been omitted since some of you are apparently basing your ideas of the F-22 on the old Nova Logic game... There is no STEALTH...it is LOW OBSERVABLE TECHNOLOGY...LOW does NOT mean INVULNERABLE... Oh, now I am being insensitive... -
Man...they call me a cranky fellow...dude what up?
