Svetlin

Guys, thank you all. So I will ave a look at the F-79 to see how the SecondaryInputName works. Hopefully that will show me the way to edit the J-10A data.ini and make the ailerons work.

Gents, has anyone tried to edit the data.ini of the J-10A to correct the problems with the control surfaces? - canards visually working in reversed mode - ailerones not moving at all I have played with the data.ini a bit to make the canards work properly and sort of managed to fix that. The ailerones however seem a tough nut for me. In reality they should act as both ailerons and flaps on take-offs and landings, however currently these do not move at all. I did try to follow the example of other similar aircraft - JAS-39 and EF-2000, but so far no progress. Anyone got a clue or could point me to a tutorial how to fix the problem with the ailerones?

I do not think there is any special skin released for the JASSM, i.e. AGM-158 A/B. The skin file JASSM.bmp (that's what the LOD file calls for) is just all grey and what you see in the picture is the normal result. I have added a few lines as an experiment for personal use, nothing too fancy really, see if you might like it.

Congratulations, looks great. Safe driving

Hi lindr2, is this project cancelled? I saw you are busy making bomb models, but still hope to see the decals pack.

Now that's some great news

Yeah, yeah, quite right, the more, the better I am so curious, what are your plans/ideas about the Su-17/22 twoseater model?

I am so glad to see someone so skilled share my interest in 2-seaters! Hope it will be released when ready.

I think the problem could be in these lines for each airbrake: HasGearDownSetting=TRUE CloseWhenGearsDown=TRUE DeployWhenOnGears=FALSE When all 3 are commented, gears show normal, but still some problem when airbrakes open/close. May be these lines should be editted somehow to make things work properly, but I still do not have the answer. Svetlin

Ja, genau wie Crusader geschrieben hat, Er war schneller

Hallo, MiG-17: http://rs244.rapidshare.com/files/109320678/Aerofax_020_-_MiG-17.rar MiG-19: http://rapidshare.com/files/274410609/Aerofax_-_Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-19.pdf MiG-21: http://rapidshare.com/files/109334220/Aerofax_-_MiG-21_Fishbed.rar MiG-25/31: http://rapidshare.com/files/109336606/Aerofax_-_MIG-025-031.rar Soviet X-Planes: http://rs655.rapidshare.com/files/23974222/372.rar Early Soviet Jets: http://rapidshare.com/files/111982923/esjfrsaoeiet4.part1.rar.html http://rapidshare.com/files/111983387/esjfrsaoeiet4.part2.rar.html Yak-26/27/28 (Achtung - auf Russisch): http://rapidshare.com/files/171419354/2359.rar Yak-36/38/41-141: http://rapidshare.com/files/140039039/MPRS036.part1.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/140043966/MPRS036.part2.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/140048753/MPRS036.part3.rar Brauchen Sie noch was?

Hallo, bitte guck mall auch da: http://www.farposst.ru/2010/04/04/Mig_23_27_Flogger___Soviet_Swing_Wing_Fighter_Strike_Aircrart__Aerofax_.html Dass ist wie eine Bibel fur MiG-23

Wow, an An-22 Anthei, now that's a fat one

There certainly is

Hi, Muesli, is this a WIP aircraft?

If you would like to give a try, set it to TRUE for one Sparrow type, for example AIM-7M and load it in game to see the effect. If it does not help, you could easily change it back to FALSE.

The pod is from wingwinner's pack here: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?app=downloads&showfile=5717

I would suggest, before editing the loadout.ini, to first check the SAHMs you mean to use (AIM-7 Sparrow versions, I guess). See with the weapon editor if the missiles have the "Use missile rail" option checked. Alternatively open the weapondata file and look in each missile entry for the following: "RailLaunched=TRUE" That should solve it. By the way, which sim is this and which F-16A (MF one or default WOI one)? Regards, Svetlin

I have some drawings, will PM you this weekend

In this case, having your permission to criticize, IRM pylons on both Su-33KUB and Su-25s need to be reshaped and rescaled. I suppose you have not dealt with these yet. Please let me know if you need info about the proper shape.

Yes, it could be so, but I do not remember seeing a picture of it. I suppose the single-seater you refer to, could be an early prototype or a test-bed, based on the 1990s MiG-29M or K airframe, quite like the MiG-29OVT. My main source of information at the moment is http://paralay.com/ They make regular updates, so I hope the information there is up-to-date and correct. Regards, Svetlin

Hi, here is in short what I have read about the new MiG-29K/KUB, hope that answers part of your questions: 1. The new K and KUB will have close to 100% identical fuselage, wings, etc. Basicly the K will be the same in outer view as the KUB, only the back seat removed and replaced with other equipment or fuel to keep the balance of the aircraft. Reason could well be economy from development and production costs. 2. MiG-29M/M2/K/KUB and MiG-35 form a new family of aircraft with identical airframe. 3. Neither of the above will have the typical MiG-29A/C/UB air intakes on top of the fuselage and moving covers inside the intakes. These are replaced with nets, just like on the Su-27/30/33, thus saving weight and giving free space for more fuel and equipment. Considering that the K and KUB will operate mostly on board aircraft carriers, whose flight decks are always carefully swept from trash and dangerous objects, there seems to be no practical need to have the old system with moving covers and additional intakes.

One more site for reference: http://paralay.com/29m.html Almost in the middle and to the right there is a scheme of the MiG-29KUB with weapons.

Oh, I see, nice progress in just 10h. Does that mean you have a standard UB in the pipe as well?