+hgbn Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Working on my list of aircrafts for the Korean War, I need a Il-10 could the Il-2 be used as an stand in??? They looks almost the same Quote
+ojcar Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Well, I'm waiting for an Il-10 too...IL-10 is faster, more nimble and more armoured than Il-2. It carries less ordnance too. Quote
+hgbn Posted February 9, 2008 Author Posted February 9, 2008 An ini tweak must could do the trick or?? Or am I missing something?? Quote
+ErikGen Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Working on my list of aircrafts for the Korean War, I need a Il-10 could the Il-2 be used as an stand in??? They looks almost the same Il-10 and Il-2? ... the difference is 8 . Quote
+Dave Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Il-10 and Il-2? ... the difference is 8 . DING DING DING DING. Yes sir you are correct. You win a cupie doll. Quote
+Gepard Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 IL-10 had a better armament and was aerodynamicly surerior to the IL-2 Quote
Wrench Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 If I remember right, the 10 is also a single seater; no rear gunner I have a 'stand-in' version in my KAW install, still using the IL-2, the summer skin, and just stuck some NKAF insignia on it. Needs a slight decal tweek to the SovNum on the tail (just a little too large). Other than that, it's a semi-done deal. I'll try and post a couple of screenies when I can. Wrench kevin stein Quote
Rambler 1-1 Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 my grandpa (or maybe great grandpa) flew an Il-10. I'd really like to get my hands on one of those! Quote
+ojcar Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Il-10 was a two seater, not a single seater. Some Il-2 were single seaters (first series). Il-10 was also a little smaller than Il-2. Quote
+whiteknight06604 Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 they were similar but a little different.The IL-10 had better streamlining and some different equipment.An ini edit will be ok but not perfect. Quote
Vigilant Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Il-10 was aerodynamicaly superior and had a bit more powerfull engine. At wery low altitude (below 1000 meters) its performance was comparable to contemporary fighters. "Early" production aircraft had standart armament of 2 7.62 MGs and 2 23mm cannons in wings and 12.7mm MG in rear turret. "Late" aircraft had 4 23mm cannons and 20mm cannon in rear turret. Czechoslovakia build B-33s had 4 20mm guns in wings and 20mm turret. All versions had a maximum bombload of 400kg - 2-4x 50kg or 100kg bombs, 4 rockets. I don't know when production switched from "early" to "late" variants, some sources say that late aircraft were post Korean War build. Anyway an ini edit can make a good stand in until somenone makes a real il-10. Quote
+Brain32 Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Well it had 2000HP(take off rating) engine, was shorter, slightly heavier and with smaller wings, allgedly it had MUCH better handling than il-2's, it's deck speed was 505kmh so not nearly as good as 1945 fighters but still some 100kmh faster than last Type 3M version of il2. Quote
Sgt.KAR98 Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 The IL-10 looks rounder,the nose is different,the wings looks smaller... Quote
+76.IAP-Blackbird Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 If you want I can upload some il2 compare pics some side by side pics with il2 and 10? Quote
+hgbn Posted February 10, 2008 Author Posted February 10, 2008 If you want I can upload some il2 compare pics some side by side pics with il2 and 10? That would be a nice thing, those pics I got is blurred and bad quality Quote
+76.IAP-Blackbird Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Those are only il2 pics but look at the difference Quote
+76.IAP-Blackbird Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Have only those lost my old ones, they were damn good .. if this doesn`t fit your expectations I can upload some new and better one.. Quote
+hgbn Posted February 10, 2008 Author Posted February 10, 2008 This is nice thanks, the Il-10 is to be a AI plane in my mind, I can see some differences in the two, but I dont think it will ruin the act if the Il-2 will be used as an stand in to and if someone make a Il-10 Quote
JediMaster Posted February 11, 2008 Posted February 11, 2008 If you have Il-2 46, both are in there. I prefer the Il-2 for its larger payload. Quote
+hgbn Posted February 11, 2008 Author Posted February 11, 2008 If you have Il-2 46, both are in there. I prefer the Il-2 for its larger payload. Well the problem is that it is for WOE Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.