Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
All this, and you folks don't foresee Beta `til the end of 2004?

 

Yep, mainly because of some structural issues - campaign, a major and important part of the sim, is still in early planning stages, with zero coding working right now. The same for the avionics and fire control suits such as the Blue Fox and Cyrano, we're still in the proccess of (slowing) gathering the needed technical references - although on Cyrano we have practically everything in hands (as opposite to Blue Fox...)

 

Also, Network coding will be started today, this Monday, hopefully ;) (scary_pigeon ;) )

Posted

scary_pigeon:

 

If I may, I'd like to make a few suggestions:

 

1) Implement some sort of autogen for the ground scenery. Pepper the terrain with forests, vehicles, buildings, etc., based on tile type.

 

2) Consider designing a campaign engine similar to that of EECH (Enemy Engaged: Commanche vs. Hokum). The ability to fire up a campaign and choose random assignments in the midst of a real-time, large-scale war was extremely enjoyable.

 

JT is looking great, keep up the good work!

Posted

Gents,

 

I work on harriers in the military. If you need a avionics consultant please contact me

 

jon.whetstone@navy.mil

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Some new here! :) Well people requested by email some high res close-up shots of the Sea Harrier and Super Etendard, so here they are (notice the windshield wiper in the Sea Harrier, I hope to make it work for those VTOL carrier landings at stormy weather):

shar-ingame1.jpg

 

etendards-ingame.jpg

Posted
Do you guys have any water textures in yet?  if you do, could we see some screens of those?

Yes we have water textures, although I am not happy with them yet, sea is very important and we're aiming for a ondulating sea mesh so ships will pitch up and down the waves - and indeed shaders / bump-surface effects.

 

What we have now is this (think of it as an option, like the water in Lomac at Low Settings or the water in IL-2 FB without the Perfect Settings enabled):

 

boringsea.jpg

 

boringsea2.jpg

 

darkseas.jpg

 

Of course it will all improve a lot over the coming months - notice that we don't have coastlines yet - that's why we avoid flying over these locations for screenshots. :)

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

eye candy may be dandy but functionality for me ;)

 

in other words - so long as the graphics provide the functionality of the stuff they represent (ie clouds break LOS, missile trails let you know a missile has been fired and it's initial trajectory) the "prettyness" is of secondary concern to me - especially if they really bog your system down.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..