Stratos Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Have been flying a bit of the Hunter in strike role, but will like to try it in A-A role too. So what plane will be a good match for the Hunter? I don't mind the origins but that can make a evenly matched fight. Thanks. Quote
Spinners Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 The Hunter will win every time... (on looks). 1 Quote
B52STRATO Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Dassault SM B.2/I.A.I Sa'ar or Mirage IIICJ (at low level) could be a good bet for Sir Camm's wonder. Quote
macelena Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 If it is meant to be of the same class, i would say a MiG-19, more performance, not so much stability. If by looks and history, i would say go for a Mirage 3 Quote
Stratos Posted April 3, 2014 Author Posted April 3, 2014 Thanks guys! I'm enjoying great dogfights this days!! Quote
stephenmcparlin Posted August 5, 2014 Posted August 5, 2014 The Hunter mixes good lethality with excellent handling and a high thrust/weight ratio. From the Mk 6 onwards it has twice as much installed thrust as a J47-powered Sabre, and still significantly more than the Canadian or Australian Sabres, both of which would have been re-engined. It always lacked internal fuel though, and while most export customers (starting with the Dutch) fitted them with AIM-9s, this was never a standard fit on RAF aircraft. Given that Hunters would have been used in RAF service for air defence long into the 1980s, the retrofit of AIM-9 onto Harrier GR3s that happened in the Falklands would probably have happened to the remaining Mks 6 and 9 in the same time frame. UK fit would probably have wound up being AIM-9B or -9G on the outboard wing pylon, as was the fit on TWU Hawks in the same period. Hawk T Mk 1 vs. Hunter would be an interesting fight.In terms of direct comparison, the Hunter would try to get a supersonic opponent into a turning flght. Woe betide the F-104 or Mirage III pilot who gets slow with a Hunter. The F-100 is an interesting comparator, because, despite nominally supersonic performance, the F-100 has lousy handling characteristics. If you want a contemporary supersonic aircraft that can turn at high subsonic,you have to look at the MiG-19 or, even better, the F-8 Crusader. Other interesting options include the A-4 Skyhawk or even the Gnat or Ajeet, both of which are very agile, but lack firepower. The MiG-17 is probably the most realistic opponent though, and a decent direct match. Quote
MigBuster Posted August 14, 2014 Posted August 14, 2014 From rather simplistic comparisons and based on what TK has put into SF2 I would definitely agree - something like: MiG-17 = Hunter F.4 MiG-17F = Hunter F.6 The F-100 is a challenge in game - even without the real life limitations it had - seems to have TW comparable to the MiG-17F/ Hunter F.6 but has much higher wingloading. I actually prefer flying the F-100 in SF2 - makes you work! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.