ravenclaw_007

hat es geklappt ??? oder was hast du jetzt gemacht ???

i love recce missions , going fast and going low

Martin this links or pictures dont show up

animating the landing gear is a real pain in the a.... , to get all parts moving and dont lose the alignment takes to long i realy wish there would be a more easy way to do this all major gear parts are done and animated

a complet rework of a RF-8 model from TMF made by BPAO - new nose section - new camera bays - new canopy and cockpit - new pitot and reworked radome - new nose gear and nose gear bay - added refueling probe - new wing center section - reworked fuselage to fit the new wing center section and still a lot more work to do antil it is done , and a special Thank You to Killerbee for his help

wenn es sich um einen virus handelt nutz auch ein wiederherstellen eines früheren Systemwidersherstellungspunk nichts je nach dem wo sich der virus eingenistet hat , ich hatte mal so einen fall wo sich der virus in der root directory eingenistet hatte und da war es so ähnlich wie bei dir jetzt ich habe den computer dann im abgesicherten modus hochgefahren und dann mit dem antiverenprogram den virus eliminiert vorallem sichere erst mal was du noch sichern kanst auf ne externe platte die du dann auch noch mal auf den virus überprüfen kmust

Rafale M , still Beta

Norm90j black nose F-4F , scramble on a december morning sadly the days with F-4F´s on the german sky are numbered

are you honestly believing that TK is using the income from this DLC´s for the development of a Exp.3 ??????

Excellent work !!!! well done Stary

this is a known problem with the new InternetExplorer10 , no remedy yet i think you have to wait for a new update from MS

F-4M_75 and Buccaneer_S2 , night refueling mission over germany

Thanks Kevin , i found the error the Desert_Airfield_ini´s are missing in the terrain folder , i added them and the problem is gone

i have the same problem as Russouk , i just downloaded all the terrains from Gepard and installed the update from Stary ,Excellent work by the way, but the aircraft are allways misaligned to the runway and the AI is on the same possition as the player aircraft

some more Iranian weapons , and no that is not a copy of the GBU-15 and yes this Sagheb rocket looks a bit odd

i work on max 2009 but it should not be any problem just send me a screenshots and what you problem is

i only can explain it via PM if that is ok with you

looks great , what terrain is that ???? mandatory screenshot

it looks like that it is very real , i would not dare to post a what if weaon here although it is not very effective , to hit a target with an ungided missile is quite difficult and over a distance from 10-20 km i would say it is impossible i set the weapon as CGR , because of game limitations , but to get a hit you have to get the gunsight exactly to the target otherwise the rocket will fail

this Yasser rocket must be one of the largest unguided rockets ever made for use from a aircraft Yasser rocket , AIM-23 rocket motor + M117 bomb AGM-379/20 it uses the M117 bomb as well

i have to correct me , the F-4 FG.1 (and i assume as well the FG.2) are not able to carry AIM-7 on pylons , i just got the weapons manual for the FG.1 and there is only the 4 fuselage bays for AIM-7 / Skyflash and in all F-4C/D/E/F/G weapons delivery manuals are only the 4 fuselage bays for AIM-7 , what is logical because the USAF does not use the Navy pylon and therfor this aircraft are not able to launch any AIM-7 , the only ever exception was the RAAF

it is getting even better than this i got info from KillerBee (he worked on F-4´s) that the F-4´s are suppose to be able to carry 8 AIM-7 what would mean that the outer wingstation are wired as well for the AIM-7 but it never was used by the Navy or the USAF , the wing-pylon AIM-7 wiring was used for the AGM-45 and AGM-88 that would explain why the RAAF F-4E could carry AIM-7 on the wing pylon by just changing the standard pylon to the Navy one , and F-4´s could carry the AGM-45 and AGM-88 on the inner and the outer wingstations so basicaly non of the F-4´s lost there capability to launch AIM-7 from wing pylons it just was never used

not only the pylon , there is a general problem with the Aircraft model , i had to shorten the pylons a bit on the hard wing F-4´s because of collision problems with the leading edge actuator thats why the position of the AIM-7 is a bit to much to the rear on the RAAF F-4E´s and the F-4J / N i´m currently working on (i may not include the AIM-7 option for the F-4J / N) The AIM-7 dimensions are correct i took them from original drawings

only few Navy pylons are delivered to the RAAF , the Navy pylon was used for Air to Air missions and missile test only but this missions are very rare the loadout in your picture was on a weapon evaluation test flight , there are 2 wings removed from the AIM-7 for the mounting of the AIM-9 here is the only picture i have of a F-4 with 6 Sparrows

as for the 6 Sparrows , the RAAF leased there F-4E for just 2 years and returned them back to the US and used them mostly in AG , this F-4´s are able to carry the 6 sparrows by just attaching the Navy-pylon , with out any rewiring to my knowledge , so why should all other Navy F-4´s not be able to do the same ???? i rather think that with the AIM-9G around it was no longer practical to use AIM-7 on this pylons and 4 x AIM-7 + 4 x AIM-9 are a better choice than 6 AIM-7 only and the only Navy pylons with out the launch rail i have seen sofar are on UK F-4M , the US Navy even used the Aim-7 launch rail pylons on there F-4S (maybe only to attach the bomb adapter that would be a possible reason) absolutley certainty about this issue you can only have if you get a copy of the NAVAIR 1-245FDB-1T and the Flight Manual Supplement section VIII , i will get soon a copy of the weapon system manual for the F-4 FG.1 may be i will find something there