-
Posts
4,247 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
315
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by ravenclaw_007
-
it looks like that it is very real , i would not dare to post a what if weaon here although it is not very effective , to hit a target with an ungided missile is quite difficult and over a distance from 10-20 km i would say it is impossible i set the weapon as CGR , because of game limitations , but to get a hit you have to get the gunsight exactly to the target otherwise the rocket will fail
-
this Yasser rocket must be one of the largest unguided rockets ever made for use from a aircraft Yasser rocket , AIM-23 rocket motor + M117 bomb AGM-379/20 it uses the M117 bomb as well
-
i have to correct me , the F-4 FG.1 (and i assume as well the FG.2) are not able to carry AIM-7 on pylons , i just got the weapons manual for the FG.1 and there is only the 4 fuselage bays for AIM-7 / Skyflash and in all F-4C/D/E/F/G weapons delivery manuals are only the 4 fuselage bays for AIM-7 , what is logical because the USAF does not use the Navy pylon and therfor this aircraft are not able to launch any AIM-7 , the only ever exception was the RAAF
-
it is getting even better than this i got info from KillerBee (he worked on F-4´s) that the F-4´s are suppose to be able to carry 8 AIM-7 what would mean that the outer wingstation are wired as well for the AIM-7 but it never was used by the Navy or the USAF , the wing-pylon AIM-7 wiring was used for the AGM-45 and AGM-88 that would explain why the RAAF F-4E could carry AIM-7 on the wing pylon by just changing the standard pylon to the Navy one , and F-4´s could carry the AGM-45 and AGM-88 on the inner and the outer wingstations so basicaly non of the F-4´s lost there capability to launch AIM-7 from wing pylons it just was never used
-
not only the pylon , there is a general problem with the Aircraft model , i had to shorten the pylons a bit on the hard wing F-4´s because of collision problems with the leading edge actuator thats why the position of the AIM-7 is a bit to much to the rear on the RAAF F-4E´s and the F-4J / N i´m currently working on (i may not include the AIM-7 option for the F-4J / N) The AIM-7 dimensions are correct i took them from original drawings
-
only few Navy pylons are delivered to the RAAF , the Navy pylon was used for Air to Air missions and missile test only but this missions are very rare the loadout in your picture was on a weapon evaluation test flight , there are 2 wings removed from the AIM-7 for the mounting of the AIM-9 here is the only picture i have of a F-4 with 6 Sparrows
-
as for the 6 Sparrows , the RAAF leased there F-4E for just 2 years and returned them back to the US and used them mostly in AG , this F-4´s are able to carry the 6 sparrows by just attaching the Navy-pylon , with out any rewiring to my knowledge , so why should all other Navy F-4´s not be able to do the same ???? i rather think that with the AIM-9G around it was no longer practical to use AIM-7 on this pylons and 4 x AIM-7 + 4 x AIM-9 are a better choice than 6 AIM-7 only and the only Navy pylons with out the launch rail i have seen sofar are on UK F-4M , the US Navy even used the Aim-7 launch rail pylons on there F-4S (maybe only to attach the bomb adapter that would be a possible reason) absolutley certainty about this issue you can only have if you get a copy of the NAVAIR 1-245FDB-1T and the Flight Manual Supplement section VIII , i will get soon a copy of the weapon system manual for the F-4 FG.1 may be i will find something there
-
i have the pylons and the wings finish and after i´m done with the F-4E´s i will make the F-4B/J/N/S i´m waiting for some manuals and more books so i can start the work , unfortunatly the NAVAIR 1-245FDB-1T and the Flight Manual Supplement section VIII are not available if somebody can get a copy of those that would be great
-
the lower panel is from a F-4E the one for the F-4J/N/S look totaly different i have been looking for a explanation quite some time now but i never found one , all the Navy/ Marines F-4 used the same pylon ( some have the launchrail removed ) and would be able to carry the a AIM-7 and even the weaponspanel is not realy showing if they are able to carry or not maybe if i get the F-4B / J / N manuals i will get some answer to it
-
-
A-10A and C Thunderbolt II "Warthog" Pack
ravenclaw_007 replied to Spectre8750's topic in File Announcements
:lol: nice wor JM- 125 replies
-
- a-10
- a-10 thunderbolt ii
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Iran-Iraq war
ravenclaw_007 replied to Centurion-1's topic in Mission & Campaign Building Discussion
the skins and some weapons for the F-4E are done , still have to make the decals does somebody know if the iranian F-4E are equipped with the LAU-7 or the Aero-3B launcher for there sidwinders ???? -
i can send you the entire aircrew weapons delivery manual for the F-4F , if you like to stady a manual by the way , what manual are you talking about ????? as for the game , i had a lot of problems with the gunsight in AG mod specialy if i use rocket-pods , but to deliver boms i found it allways easy to do and mostly i got a direct hit on the target
-
-
-
yes you have to install the decals as well if it is a separate install
-
i realy like the skin , that looks absolutely fantastic
-
almost finish i just have to make some more skins
-
yap i think it is quite helpfull even though the TISEO was more for air to air use in SF2 it is a real good tool for AG missions imagin if we would have a better avionics available and you could lock the tiseo to a target , i even would pay if TK would come up with something like that as a DLC
-
looks ok to me
-
you only need LGR and AttachmentType=USN , and check the pylons LoadLimit as well as the StartYear=1985 on the FA-18E only the inner pylon is setup for the AGM-123
-
if you use one of the TISEO equipt F-4E´s check this - switch your radar mode antil the TISEO screen appears - now to identify and engage ground targets with the gun is realy easy , Thanks to Crusader
