I tried a few dogfights in a fictional 1980 exercises IAF vs USN using mainly stock aircraft, (along with some antiship attacks with Israeli A-4Ns against US warships) and results are rather interesting. F-15s own the sky against anything, outmatching the F-14 in BVR effectiveness and outmaneuvering the F-16 by powerplant. F-14s are surprisingly agile, even against F-16s, whose numbers are cut shorter before merging. While the F-16s are the most agile of all, they are rather less capable against other 4th gen fighters.
Skyhawks, both IDFAF´s N and USMC´s M, lack power to dogfight properly, but their agility help them to keep up. The opposite can be said of the Kfir. Despite that, the lack of specific radar make A-A gunfire quite hard, even while i prefer manually aiming for that matter.
Now, the ultimate Phantom vs Phantom showdown. F-4S Vs F-4E Kurnass (78). Well, while the IAF plane gains with a cannon, i would say there is a bit less agile than the Navy plane, but i could be wrong. F-4S is also slightly superior in terms of BVR with stats about accuracy.
About IRMs, I would say the Python is better than the Sidewinder. Despite that, i find non all aspect missiles (like Aim-9J, H, N, P) to be quite more resistant to flares than all-aspect missiles.