Jump to content

Svetlin

JAGDSTAFFEL 11
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    887

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Svetlin

  1. Svetlin
    IMHO, the problem is with the pylons - they are a bit too high indeed. The cutout in the flap is there. If one would check the last but one picture and compare with the last one, one would definitely see the pylons are a bit too high. Just compare the position of right inner pylon lowest point at the front against the right main gear door as reference.
  2. Svetlin
    I guess you are talking about the Matra JL-100: Available thanks to Ravenclaw of course and this is the data ini: [WeaponData001] TypeName=JL-100 FullName=Matra JL-100 Rocket Pod ModelName=JL-100 Mass=422.500000 Diameter=0.410000 Length=4.449000 SubsonicDragCoeff=0.174000 SupersonicDragCoeff=0.514200 AttachmentType=FRANCE SpecificStationCode= NationName=FRANCE StartYear=1965 EndYear=0 Availability=3 BaseQuantity=4 Exported=TRUE ExportStartYear=1965 ExportEndYear=0 ExportAvailability=3 WeaponDataType=2 RailLaunched=FALSE RocketTypeName=SNEB68 NumRockets=18 ROF=18.000000 FireEffectName= FireEffectTime=0.150000 FrontCoverNodeName=Cover_Front RearCoverNodeName= ShowRockets=TRUE MirrorOffset=FALSE MaxFuelAmount=216.000000 Rocket01Position=-0.040000,1.411000,0.149000 Rocket02Position=0.039000,1.411000,-0.150000 Rocket03Position=-0.109000,1.411000,0.109000 Rocket04Position=0.109000,1.411000,-0.109000 Rocket05Position=-0.150000,1.411000,0.039000 Rocket06Position=0.149000,1.411000,-0.040000 Rocket07Position=-0.149000,1.411000,-0.040000 Rocket08Position=0.149000,1.411000,0.040000 Rocket09Position=-0.109000,1.411000,-0.109000 Rocket10Position=0.109000,1.411000,0.109000 Rocket11Position=-0.041000,1.411000,-0.149000 Rocket12Position=0.040000,1.411000,0.149000 Rocket13Position=-0.038000,1.662000,0.066000 Rocket14Position=0.038000,1.662000,-0.066000 Rocket15Position=-0.076000,1.662000,0.000000 Rocket16Position=0.075000,1.662000,-0.001000 Rocket17Position=-0.038000,1.662000,-0.066000 Rocket18Position=0.038000,1.662000,0.066000 In the aircraft data.ini, in the respective weapons station entry you have to add AllowedWeaponClass=RFT
  3. Svetlin
    A walkaround of an A-6A modified into an A-6E is available here: https://www.net-maquettes.com/pictures/grumman-a-6a-intruder-walkaround/ Just keep pressing "Load More" after the first 9 pictures as the walkaround contains a total of 157 images.
  4. Svetlin
    Hi, GKABS, hope you will be able to implement the different configurations of the Aero 1D 300-gal drop tank. Aero 1D single fin (to be loaded under the wings of the A-6A/B/C): Aero 1D with 2 fins (to be loaded on the centerline station under the fuselage during the early years of A-6 operations): Aero 1D with NO fins (to be loaded on the centerline station under the fuselage during the later years of A-6 operations): The models are not mine, but by one of the well-known, kind and generous modders here at CA and I am showing these only to illustrate my point.
  5. Svetlin
    The Scandinavian Front with the Viggen family included is available here at CA, but yes, a Viggen is not available as a standalone download, one has to download the full Scandinavian Front mod to get access to the Viggen. Unless I am mistaken, the Viggen family models were touched a bit by Ravenclaw at some point, so even if these and the DAT one originate from the same source file (which I am not sure they do), the models in the Scandinavian Front should not be affected by the said politics.
  6. Svetlin
    I support both an improved A-6 family (A-6A, A-6B, A-6C, KA-6D, A-6E, EA-6A, EA-6B) and a Viggen family (AJ-37, JA-37, SF-37, SH-37, SK-37, JA-37D). The stock A-6 has issues with the pylons - wrong size and shape. The drop tanks are wrong in size as well. The Viggen family available in the Scandinavian Front mod has issues with the control surfaces - these do not work correctly and I fear that may be more than just an issue with the data.ini.
  7. Svetlin
    For this one, yes please, so it could be properly loaded under the EA-6B wings (on the stock EA-6B model, the attachment extension is part of the ALQ-99 pod, not part of the pylon, so if we replaced the stock ALQ-99 with your better looking one, we would need the attachment extension): For this one, not necessary, because if I understand correctly, this version is loaded predominantly on the centerline station without attachment extension:
  8. Svetlin
    I know it is being frowned upon making requests to modders and I apologize in advance, but GKABS, could you make an ALQ-99 dedicated model for the EA-6B? You have the pod, all that is missing is an adapter to be added:
  9. Svetlin
    Yep, that one in SEA camo wrap-around scheme is in the pack as well.
  10. Svetlin
    Yes, just as Soulfreak said, that skin is in the Ravenvclaw's F-4E ANG and AFRES pack, it is available for the F-4E_85_ANG.
  11. Svetlin
    Hoping for a TAV-8B in 2024... (from my letter to Santa )
  12. Svetlin
    I am no expert, but it looks to me more real like this: To my knowledge, the gun camera is more or less on the center line in the cockpit, while the Pitot tube is offset to the right on the nose, so probably the picture was inverted at some point (if it is real).
  13. Svetlin
    Hi ravenclaw, have you by chance worked on a BRU-55/57 model for weaponspack 3?
  14. Svetlin
    A Finn over Germany in special colors. The bird required some minor finetuning as well - wheels rolling radius, front tires size (too low profile originally), some weapons attachment positions (weapons sitting too far back on the pylons).
  15. Svetlin
    Was the Swiss Mirage IIIS the best looking Mirage III? I think so.
  16. Svetlin
    Nose jobs - Israeli style. The TC2 though does not look that bad.
  17. Svetlin
  18. Svetlin
  19. Svetlin
    Looking at your updates on the Typhoon and the Rafale, GKABS, makes me wish Qatar bought a few Gripens too
  20. Svetlin
    Iron Eagle and Flight of Black Angel may have been rather lame movies, but they got me somewhat obsessed with the Kfir. What if Israel kept the Kfir in its C.10 and TC.10 variants.
  21. Svetlin
    Hi guys, has anyone come across or made a newer model for the Charles de Gaulle R91 aircraft carrier, one without static aircraft? I know there is one released by aleks1 back in 2013, but it has built-in static Rafale aircraft, which I would say only spoil the overall model. I guess chances are slim, but thought I should ask in case I have missed something.
  22. Svetlin
    Yes, you can still use the old skins. There are 2-3 additional texture files, that you have to copy from the new skin into the old skins files. One is for the refuelling probe, one is for the IRST and I do not remember what the third one was for. I have already adapted the AMI skins to the new model.
  23. Svetlin
    Lovely update of the Typhoon, GKABS, thank you! I remember you were thinking about a 2-seater version at one point. Hope to see it one day.
  24. Svetlin
    Hi Coupi, I do not have that problem in my install. If I were you, I would delete the Rafale mod from the game, download the latest version of the mod and install it anew.
  25. Svetlin
    Very strong with the force that guy must be... A missile took away the middle section of the fuselage, leaving no connection between the nose and the rear, but that guy in the cockpit still manages to keep his stuff together.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..