Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Spinners

Panavia Tornado - Ejército del Aire

Recommended Posts

Panavia Tornado IDS - Ala 11, Ejército del Aire, 1988

 

EDATORNADOIDS01_zps5ac09b01.jpg

 

EDATORNADOIDS02_zpsee003fdb.jpg

 

EDATORNADOIDS03_zpsab901033.jpg

 

EDATORNADOIDS04_zpse4d750e8.jpg

 

EDATORNADOIDS05_zps4b35ac45.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This one actually make sense. Well done!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks!!!!!! Its really great and a what if that could be in FACA proyect.....

 

 

 

 

Release please

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That one would fit to the one I've done a while ago as bomber complement while mine could serve as interceptor/escort unit

 

http://combatace.com...rcito-del-aire/

 

Looking great btw :good:

Edited by ValAstur

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great Job!!

 

A little history.

 

When the EDA bought the F-18A, this Tornado was one of the options, along with the F-16, F-14, F-15, F-5 Tiger II/III (i don´t remember) and Mirage 2000.

 

They despised the F-15 and the F-14 due to its high cost, and the Tiger II/III was an improvement of the F-5A.

 

Then, the Tornado were discarded (For purely political decision :dntknw: ) and Mirage 2000 for not being a versatile platform.

 

The decision was between the F-18 and F-16, and was chosen the first because it was more polyvalent

 

Personally, I think the F-16 has aged better...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tornados were not discarded for any political reason, in fact, i have the article in wich it scored, over trials, 17% the A-A capability of the Hornet and 85% of its A-G capacity. In fact, the only political pressure was to reevaluate the Mirage 2000 against F-16s and F-18s. When only the Falcon and the Hornet remaind, it was determined that a lower amount of hornets could do the same job as more Falcons, due to greater capabilities (then, avionics and weapons systems of the Hornet were quite better, and air refueling system compatible with our KC-130s) despite the longer range and lower cost per unit of the F-16

 

Back on topic, it would have been great to be a part of the program as we would be later with EF2000. Besides, Tornados may not be the most practical aircraft in the scenarios it met, but it is a badass classic low level mud mover.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..