Stratos Posted November 16, 2013 Posted November 16, 2013 I know we have several artists that like to design their own "what ifs", wondering If anyone ever designed a jet powered P-38 Lightning. Will like to see your ideas guys! Quote
bucklehead101 Posted November 16, 2013 Posted November 16, 2013 (edited) Whaaaaaaaaaatttt!?!?!?!?!??!?! This sounds completely off the wall insane. However, it does sound awesome! Cant wait to see some ideas lol After doing a quick google search, I found out that Lockheed had done some things such as add the out wings of a P-38 to a different, jet powered body and came up with the L-133. Edited November 16, 2013 by bucklehead101 Quote
B52STRATO Posted November 16, 2013 Posted November 16, 2013 What if: to ensure greater survivability of its recon F-5G over Indochina, the French Air Force fitted them with two Turbomeca Palas under the wings. Quote
Wrench Posted November 16, 2013 Posted November 16, 2013 oh, for fraaks sake... that prototype is what became the P-80 Quote
Sheriff001 Posted November 16, 2013 Posted November 16, 2013 The Saab 21R is the closest thing I know to a jet P-38 1 Quote
+whiteknight06604 Posted November 16, 2013 Posted November 16, 2013 I would say remove the engines but leave the tail boom. add a jet in the rear of the pilots pod with a nose inlet .kinda like a P-38 and a vampire merged into one. Quote
B52STRATO Posted November 17, 2013 Posted November 17, 2013 Why not put two small turbojets at the wingtip, empty the engines housing and use them as fuel tanks or rocket launchers (like with the F-94 middle wings rocket pods ?) Quote
PraetorH Posted November 17, 2013 Posted November 17, 2013 Maybe not what you had in mind, but still the Porax 38 Magna Guard fighter from Star Wars is basically P-38...: Quote
dsawan Posted November 17, 2013 Posted November 17, 2013 http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/aviation/why-not-jet-driven-p-38-a-9076-2.html pic down below-the saab jet Quote
Fubar512 Posted November 17, 2013 Posted November 17, 2013 Let me see if I've got this right....you're proposing a jet-powered version of an aircraft that suffered from aerodynamic compressability at relatively low Mach levels? Quote
Stratos Posted November 18, 2013 Author Posted November 18, 2013 Let me see if I've got this right....you're proposing a jet-powered version of an aircraft that suffered from aerodynamic compressability at relatively low Mach levels? In late versions (and early variants got conversion kits too) solved the compressability and buffeting problems, what I can't imagine is a jet engine installed on the place of the prop engines. Quote
Toryu Posted November 18, 2013 Posted November 18, 2013 A jet-powered fighter with a critical Mach-number of 0.67 - doesn't sound that brilliant to me. Quote
+76.IAP-Blackbird Posted November 28, 2013 Posted November 28, 2013 They produced alot stuff that doesnt worked well, the P-38 as one example ;-) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.