F-4G Cockpits

[Flanker562]

I don't know, if there is an error then we're going to take away your Modder status...

Seriously I understand that things aren't getting better, so take a break maybe, you know just chill out a bit. 

[yakarov79]

Yes, we going to ban you if you will take care about yourself rather than details in cockpit.

we have been waiting for many mods two weeks often. And we used substitutes for missing parts for years. We pretended we have something when we had nothing. We are CA-tizens, We wait 2 weeks… and then we wait for next 2 weeks.

mods can always wait.

 

i can not wait until i play with new things…few more days tho…

Edited yesterday at 03:52 PM by yakarov79

[CSomers611]

2 hours ago, ravenclaw_007 said:

please report if you find any error or problem , Thanks

So far I've just checked them through the LOD Viewer and noticed the following:

23rd TFS/52nd TFW "SP" Euro 1; 81st TFS/52nd TFW "SP" Euro 1; and 480th TFS/52nd TFW "SP" Euro 1

- No Tail Numbers displayed for 69-0244 

 

Will start test flying it soon, thank you!

Please take care of yourself, we truly appreciate your work.

Edited yesterday at 05:22 PM by CSomers611

[Flanker562]

It's a flying brick at most, but then again, I did fly it for a few minutes, and did some low-level flying and it was responsive and well to handle. Sure it's a flying brick at the most, but then again you're not exactly flying air-to-air combat either.

[daddyairplanes]

2 hours ago, CSomers611 said:

- No Tail Numbers displayed for 69-0244 

that sn shouldnt be in an F-4G_85 line up. it was one of the second batch of conversions in late 88/early 89

[daddyairplanes]

@ravenclaw_007 you know im going to reorganize the USAFE birds right?   still got the notes on who was where , and three squadrons sharing serials just wont do 

is this model wildly different from the one you were working on a few years back?

[ravenclaw_007]

i just use the model so everybody can try the new cockpit  

[CSomers611]

3 hours ago, daddyairplanes said:

that sn shouldnt be in an F-4G_85 line up. it was one of the second batch of conversions in late 88/early 89

Just pointing out what I saw.

[Nightshade/PR]

I took it out for a run, and decided to leave the nukes at home. This time. I saw or felt nothing that I can see as an issue. Now my wingman (of his own accord) DID decide to tangle with a ZSU-23-4, and it shot him to pieces. Other than that it flies well, and it IS fun at low level, and looking around the cockpit is a lot of fun when you're just cruising outbound, or inbound for home.

[Flanker562]

I don't know if this is a "fixable" issue, but it seemed that the cockpit digital compass (to the left of the HUD) was, it could just mean stick input caused it to look like that, but I  1 degree off from the in-game map when you're flying.  I mean it's not going to get you killed, or if that can be tweaked, but it was another thing I noticed. I mean it could just mean stick input caused it to look like that, but just wanted to bring it up.

[CSomers611]

I've taken her up on a few SEAD missions over Korea, and so far, she's performed pretty well. My most effective loadout has been a combination of HARMs and Mavericks, along with three AIM-7s and four AIM-9s for self-defense.

She certainly wasn't designed to be an air-to-air fighter, but I've managed to tangle with a few MiGs and even put a couple of them in the dirt!

Thanks for this! I'll keep Phlying her and reporting back!