JediMaster

It might be easier to take another plane and hook up holographic projectors to make it LOOK like a 105.

I prefer the forward quarter attacks, but not true head on. In other words, hit them forward of their 3-9 line, either between 10-11 or 1-2. It presents a larger profile than a head-on, less movement across your FOV than a true attack on the 3-9 line, and relative safety from the tail guns.

On a related note, I was LOL when the latest album by The Offspring came out and the final track was titled "Slim Pickens Does the Right Thing and Rides the Bomb to Hell." http://www.amazon.com/Days-Go-By-Explicit/dp/B008BIZ06M/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1347473541&sr=1-1&keywords=offspring Anyway, like many others I won't abandon SF2 any more than I have abandoned other sims. I may fly it more or less depending on mood, and I may at some point cease buying future TW products if they fail to interest me. Doesn't mean the SF2 I have now won't still be fun. Even if all the modders gave up today, how long would it take to thoroughly fly and get tired of ALL the mods we have?

Is that .DLC file in the DLC directory in your SF2 program folder? Also check your option.ini and make sure that DLC = true there.

That seems to indicate 2, 3, and 4 are all acceptable, although obviously only #3 could net you the top scores. Seems you could get a 3.0 with a 4 wire.

Oh, I know I always take 4 9's and 4 7's when I fly the F-15 in FC2! Actually, the 120 is a decent replacement for the 9's. Use it as a dogfight missile and you get better range with roughly the same PK! But wingmen don't let wingmen do BVR with 120s...in FC.

Uh...aye aye, Captain! Heh heh, heh heh!

Turkish F-4E next??

The problem is there's always more #2.

My wife flew to Rhode Island the day before. She was stranded there when the airspace was shut down, she got the last rental car in the city to drive back and left late that day...she passed north of Manhattan, but saw the smoke in the south. I was stuck here powerless to do anything. My cousin was working in the 2nd tower and made the smart decision to get out after the first plane hit. She was halfway down the stairs when the 2nd hit, said it was the most horrible single moment in her life. She passed firefighters going up the stairs, said they never came out. She was still running away from it when it collapsed. Her bloodstained shoes (from the blisters she got from running in "business appropriate" shoes that are really unsuitable even for walking in) I believe were donated to the 9/11 museum. I posted the story she wrote for her newspaper in NJ here last year on the 10th anniversary.

I don't get the uproar either. Who cares what he did in Vegas? If you didn't break any laws (or at least get arrested for it), then so what?

The 940's biggest problem, the reversal bug, is that Logi doesn't consider it a bug. They claim that is by design, and they refuse to change it or allow it to be changed in the drivers. On top of that, the drivers are aging and despite reassurances and claims that a newer version is being worked on it's been over 2 YEARS now since the last release. Literally 8/30/2010, or 2 years and about 2 weeks. They've released an integrated driver for some of their things, but the 940 isn't one of them. Of course, the G27 wheel uses the same software and it's working fine...but then it was just in a better state at release. So, the drivers are functional and other than the reversal bug it works fine, but Logi's treatment of the issue has caused a lot of bad feelings. FWIW I've had a 940 since a couple of months after release. I did have to open the throttle and the rudders to loosen the overly tight wires that were causing spiking in some readings (no idea why there wasn't more slack in the design), but since doing that it's been rock solid. I have no experience with the Saitek, so I won't comment, you can easily look up other's opinions on that yourself.

Easy, that's the Fugly Glasshouse. You can tell just by LOOKING at it.

IIRC there was an SFP1 version made six years ago. We really could use an SF2 one, yes.

Oh, hey Marvin! Haven't seen you in awhile. Where's my Iludium Q-37 Explosive Space Modulator???

That has to be taken in context, though. Energy production was dirt cheap in the 90s. Oil and natural gas were at rock bottom prices. Shortly after 9/11 the prices began to rise, hitting record prices by mid-decade. As a net exporter, Russia made a killing selling that stuff. He had little control over that. Now how much oil and gas have directly contributed to the Russian economy is not a question I can answer, but I'm sure it's more than "just a bit".

Don't worry, I'm also Dave's science adviser. I'm working on a new weapon. Forget the suitcase nuke, we're going to have iNukes! 4G, Retina display, Facetime, 32GB storage, and .5kt yield. Front and rear-facing 10MP cameras for assured target discrimination. The iNuke. When you care enough to vaporize them, but you want to leave the neighborhood intact.

I don't think anyone will argue against his effectiveness in the past. However, the public perception of him today is not what it was 10 years ago. I don't know how effective he will continue to be.

Nice idea, but this shot taken from orbit is pretty cool:

Peter Cullen is the James Earl Jones of animation. Just as Vader would've been far less without Jones' voice, Optimus would've been nothing without Cullen.

LOL, I'd vote for Dave. What a great campaign slogan he'd have! Dave Slavens 2016...STFU!!!

Yes, I've altered the labels myself a few times.

FYI the original line was "weekend in Dallas" (and you can see his lips actually say Dallas, it was looped over later) but was changed as the film came out not too long after JFK's death and Dallas was apparently "unfunny" at the time. Anyway, while I agree starting from scratch doing that would cost big bucks, maybe you have the right idea but the wrong target. TK has proven very resistant to listening to others after his experiences with publishers like Strat First and Destineer. However, ED is now working with numerous smaller devs (Thirdwire-sized) that have focused on FS9/FSX planes to have them make planes for DCS World. Perhaps what you want to do can be accomplished to some extent, for less money, with them? Combined Arms is already adding an RTS-type element to DCS World. There will be planes from the hardcore DCS A-10C and Ka-50 to less rivet-counting models like the F-22. I honestly don't know how much the 3rd party people will be able to do other than add planes, terrain has been mentioned, but only ED themselves know what their plans include. As a serious potential investor you may or may not get them to talk to you (depending on how much you can invest and what their numbers look like). If ED won't talk, maybe you can invest in IRIS or one of the other 3rd parties. You wouldn't be able to affect what ED will let the 3rd parties do, but you could affect what that particular 3rd party would look to do within ED's larger framework. Some of the other stuff you've mentioned sounds like what Mad Catz is doing based on FSX, I forget the name of it now.

That wasn't a stunt, that was a career.

I don't know, but I can picture Jamie Farr in drag at the controls!