I'm going to have to disagree with the prevailing crowd here.
Net Neutrality is not exactly what it is portrayed as. At the core is the idea that every internet service provider (ISP) will be required to treat all data the same. that doesn't really track very well.
If a company lays out the infrastructure to carry their data, they should be able to charge for that, #1, and should be able to make agreements with content providers for discounts for them and for their customers.
The idea that an ISP cannot make tiered service levels, and prices, hurts the providers since their cost-of-service is different for different classes of users. This will undermine the economic viability of both the ISP's and the content providers.
Essentially, the idea that the internet is a utility and the US feds should be able to regulate what is an open, free-market, international network is not a great idea.
The internet has developed and evolved without any such oversight. What is the compelling need now for the US federal gov't to intervene and regulate? and especially without any authorizing legislation?
This is a power grab, pure and simple.
So those who brought you the Unaffordable Care Act will now rescue you all from - what? If you like your ISP, you can keep your ISP?
what could possibly go wrong...........................