Gocad

Of course does the MF Jan WP work with the Oct 2008 patch. Older weapon packs will work just fine once you install them using the instructions (LINK) found in the knowledge base. What's so hard about that to understand?

You don't have to.

I guess that depends on who's ordering it...

Most warships do have some light guns (20mm to 30mm) to repell small boats. These should be sufficient to deal with those pirate boats.

No question, the whole op will be nothing more but a passive effort to deter further hijack attempts. As mentioned already, the actual problem is the current state of Somalia... I'm not even sure whether sinking a few of those pirate boats would make any difference here.

There are plenty of older skins whose number decals start at 001 (i.e. num001.tga, num002.tga, etc.) , but actually they should start at 000.

Cool, I wasn't aware that the USS Randolph had received such an extensive make over. nm.

I agree, FS36440 looks way better than the FS36320/36375 combination.

FYI, the TPS for the A-7 used Light and Dark Compass Ghost Grey as well. The overall Gull Grey paint job was used around the late 1970s/early 1980s.

Nah, it's more like that a few parts have been removed for some reason.

Uhm, that's not a complete ship, but just a skin. Seriously, why need more ships...or should I rather say more modders like Hinch?

Sure. Just change their type to CARGO_SHIP and mark them as VERY_COMMON. For an extra challenge play around with these entries FormationSizeBase=2 > increase means more ships of that type in the formation FormationSizeVariation=3

Did you have a ground target selected? That's necessary, because otherwise they won't launch.

That's one good looking carrier.

Don't waste your time with that one. It's utterly ridiculous, not only because Madonna is in it. The Bond producers must have been doing some bad drugs when they conceived that one. Then again, the 19th Bond wasn't that much better either.

Well, my rig has been deemed to be good enough for medium settings...and an 800x600 resolution, which is probably not as pretty as some higher resolutions, but I'm used to even worse, so it's good enough for me. First impressions: Game runs fine, especially when you consider that Bethseda's forum is full of bug reports and that there's already a patch for FO3 in the making. I have to admit that I'm currently playing at 'very easy' difficulty, but I play games to have fun and not to be screwed over repeatedly by the AI. ... anyway, tagging small arms (and taking the 10mm pistol from the overseer's daughter) made my escape from the vault quite easy. And when I finally left the vault I got to see this: For a second I wanted to go back into the vault, but due to the mayhem I had caused on my way out I realized that I had no choice but to move on. Moments later I ran into some raiders...but thanks to VATS they were not much of a problem. (I do have a pic from this encounter as well, but I'm not sure whether I should post this here)

I guess TK added this line to make sure that the AIM-4 would only show up on the dedicated Falcon missile stations of the F-4C.

F-8B,J,E,D (seriously, although many missions are photo ops in support of skinning projects) F-106 F-14

They won't? Damn.

Good pics. This is probably the armchair aircraft designer speaking, but why the fixed refueling probe?

I concur. I'm not even sure whether adding a second engine would have given the Crusader a better performance...

Scratch one MiG.

No, he's not. But I guess there's no point in trying to explain why none of what he has posted there made any sense.

MiG met Sidewinder...