Jump to content

Brain32

+MODDER
  • Posts

    3,005
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by Brain32

  1. The original one yes, but SA-2 was upgraded over the years and served well into 1980's, although some claim there are even some operational units now in Russia... How accurate is that - I don't know
  2. This wasn't directed to you hehe. I made my Hawks work great but noticed they are a real nightmare so I went digging the wep pack a bit... For example the "K" version which was a 1995 upgrade had a starting year of 1959 in-game, actually all Hawks did :) So basically I just wanted people to know numbers should be tweaked a bit because sooner or later they would start wondering where's that nightmare coming form ;-)
  3. If you want Blue sams then unless one likes FSX type of flying Blue missiles should be corrected to believable values aka toned down by 50% lol Not to mention adjusting introducition years....
  4. Well one can atleast enter Czech language subforum and say something in english without being shot on place like on some other forums...so I actually don't mind this! Maybe just out of spite, but actually to support normal people who do not demand you to learn their language from scratch in order to post one single measly post in their subforum... EDIT: P.S. I know it may not be related to your thoughts muesli, but I hold this grudge on "language nazis" for a while now...
  5. This is what one real(now retired) F-16 pilot told to me about "fighting" different planes:
  6. Did you understand the first part? That's the important one ;-) EDIT: Anyway...this is not the place to discuss the above problem if anybody is unclear on what I really meant with that point, you are free to either send me a PM or open a new topic in a more appropriate place. This thread is for Krizis excellent upcoming Yak-38 model :)
  7. Samo da mi jos jedanput netko prosere sto ne pisem na njihovom jeziku na njihovom forumu - jebat cu im majke...
  8. Mind if I ask you what are you basing your statement on?
  9. As far as terrain options I would even be hillariously happy with 10+ years old il-2 terrain system instead of this....*#$%!
  10. hmm it should be quite easy...but I can't know what may be the problem without more details
  11. Don't know man, it's one of the smoothest rides here... Now skins are rather big but I have ridiculous ammount of memory so I might not feel it. If I had any problems with it I would first try to downsize the skins, this was a real problem solver when I had only 1GB of RAM...
  12. For ALT+N addicts like me: When you prepare for quick mission, enter the MAP menu and simply adjust the last waypoint before the objective(or in simpler and probably more correct words, move the one that is shaped as a square) that way ALT+N can bring you 100-200km away from the enemy so you can prepare better for the fight without having to fly all the way...
  13. Well everything I've ever read about F-104 was that it was designed as a very low drag airframe around a powerfull engine... All accounts mention tremendous acceleration also... Now on this page: http://airforce-world.blogspot.com/2006/10...tarfighter.html it says CD0(Zero-lift drag coefficient) was 0.0172 Now when I look at TK's 104G CD0 is 0.0253 and that's for fuselage alone although other parts in TK's data.ini do not have high CD0 values, all together they are 0.0312 which is not very far from twice the drag of the real thing... Ofcourse the data on the link above does not provide much authority and it's quite possible if not even probable that TK has better data, however...it's worthy of investigation for F-104 fans ;-)
  14. Well that's easy to solve...either adjust the thrust of the engine or adjust drag(CD0).. I usually go for the drag as engines have quite correct thrust values on stock planes as far as I saw...
  15. I had the same message appearing and didnt solve it, but I can open the file with WinRAR and extract without problems :)
  16. Yeah but that's because my CPU is calculating stuff like shadows and reflections while my 1 TeraFLOPS capable gfx card is jacking off lol
  17. AI's missiles do not obey same rules as players, keep that in mind, I experimented A LOT with it. My Russian missiles are not dead weight, vanilla R-27 is about as good as 7F while later versions(mainly 27ER) I've set up on par with 7M as they really were upgraded a lot. Also no Russian Alamo was ever fired in anger IIRC, downgraded export versions were so comments about that are dubious at best same as about the planes as that is the Russian export policy. However all that is futile anyway when AI can fly more or less strait poping decoys I call "Burning B-52's Mk1" and easily fool the same missile I can't avoid doing 12-14G manouver trailing a wall of decoys. All in all Blackbirds advice is the best and in my install valid for all planes, as soon as you get tracking sound from your RWR, dive to the deck wait for it, pop out, fire your stuff and run like there's no tommorow ;)
  18. I voted AI, but actually I think very few if any would be happier with better/more terrain building options... However I don't believe that will happen anytime soon if at all :(
  19. Nah you can just dial dimensions in TE...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..