shotdown

Terrorist in traininig. Yes, their supporters (too many in Spain, even among those who say they don't like terrorism) say it's not the same; but those street riots (planned by ETA people) are essentially the first step for future terrorists. About political support for these "people" , I only mentioned mr. Giscard because, if I had to say my opinion on our own politicians :angry2: (actually, 1/1000th of my opinion) I'd be banned for ever from this forum (or any civilized place) for foul language

Actually, I had already seen pictures of Warthogs with those big fuel tanks. A pity I don't have them here to post (they were on a book I cannot findright now)

I hope the frenchs send them to jail for good, something that, unfortunatelly, I cannot expect to happen to those caught here in Spain. BTW, congratulations Mr Giscard, see what happens when you help terrorists.

I agree with you.

Yes, Sith wear black, jedi wear brown. That's the ral difference

Were you shot down by human opponents or computer AI? I mean, with the snipper class shooting acuracy of AI planes you might have taken much more hits in a few seconds than were possible from a human enemy. Anyway, I remember reading somewhere that heavy bombers could be shoot down with 20-30 "light" (20 mm) cannon hits or 3-5 "heavy" (30 mm) hits, so I'm not really sure a thunderbolt (6-7 tons against 30 tons of a heavy bomber) could take mor than 5-6 20 mm hits and keep flying.

He was both things.

Nowadays even "The end of the worl" is not what it used to be.

Podría ser un buen avión para una película. Desde luego quedaría muy espectacular.

Well, I'm a pop-corn movie fan myself and I dinn't like Avatar. Sorry but, paying double for watching "Pocahontas 3-D" is, in my opinion, too close to stealing people's money.

Yes, but this is something that actually happened in the real Battle of Britain. Many german bombers returned to their bases after being hit many times due to the lack of enough killing power of light MGs.

Actually in some WWII fighters (armed with light MGs and guns) MGs were used almost only for targetting (you shoot MGs, if they hit the target, then you can hit him with the gun). Anyway, it's been months since I my last flight with something that was not a Bf109, so I might have had the same problem with MG and simply forgot it (Or perhaps I never had the problem because of my poor shooting accuracy )

She's been the first actress (and I think the first person) to win Razzie and Oscar the same year, but I think she got them for different movies.

What about rendering him unconscious, injecting some whisky in his blood, spilling some more whisky into a car, leave the bottle on the co-pilot seat and then sitting him on the driver car and crashing (I'm talking about a remote controlled car, of course, no need to hurt anyone else) on a bridge pilar while running 250 Km/h? I mean, it's too good compared to what those people deserve, but perhaps, yihadist wannabes might think twice before following someone who doesn't even meet the standards for an average muslim (Hey, he called himself a yihaddist and yet he died because he crashed while driving heavily drunk what kind of muslim is that )

Creo que en la zona de descargas hay Tu-22 y B-58 con cabina. No sé lo realista que serán, pero supongo que será un poquito mejor que directamente pegarles la cabina de otro avión.

Pues sinceramente, creo que puestos a elegir, tiene mucho más sentido ponerle a un B-58 la cabina de un F-106 (hasta es de la misma marca ). Es que eso de ponerle a un avión mach 2 la cabina de un B-17 me parece un poco excesivo. ¿Tal vez la cabina de un F105? (después de todo, a pesar de la "F", el 105 es basicamente un bombardero)

I don't think it will go further than moral support (like 1982). BTW, Mrs Clinton is suposed to defend USA's interests not UK's right?

As far as glory is concerned I don't think the Hornet can match the Spitfire. I mean, The Hornet didn't save USA from a foreing invasion (Actually, in the battle of Britain, it was the Hurricane that did most of the hard work, but for most people BoB means Messerschmitt vs Spitfire)

I don't think a laptop is a good idea for simming games (and those that could work are probably more expensive than 600-700 $). Could it be possible with that money to get a cheap laptop and parts to buy a desktop one? You already have GPU and (I gess) mouse, keyboard and screen. So it should be just a matter of getting power source, motherboard, memory and HD.

Actually X-52 has throttle (unless we are talking about a broken Joystick)

Corvette vs Viper? Since there is no practical side here I guess the only possible answer is: whichever you like better.

Actually, the problem is what they do with someone else(the unborn child)'s body.

sethiii, if you are spanish, perhaps you can try asking this people

You could try starting with something easy to fly, like a spitfire. It must be difficult to tell people how to fly to avoid stalling, when there are so many different planes in hte game.

What's exactly the difference?. I mean, isn't abortion exactly that, killing your unborn child?