Jump to content

daddyairplanes

MODDER
  • Posts

    9,008
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    175

Everything posted by daddyairplanes

  1. Well, as said if wrong someone would correct me! Glad you were able to get hooked up
  2. i believe the animation has to be done in the original max file. if TK didnt animate it, your SOL. i'm sure i will get corrected if wrong suspecting what you're upto, why not use the C and D models from FCs superpack instead? the extra lumps and bumps would be justified given the Navy likes internal jammers vs the AF liking podded. extra bulk due to beefing up for carrier ops. not a solution to your question, but hopefully a helpful observation
  3. are you talking TMF or Veltro's? as far as i understood all work on TMFs was fakepilot addons Edit: on the above i was talking the Sentry. Dont recall if the KC-135 R is a different complete model or TMF with diff engines
  4. http://www.military.com/daily-news/2015/07/01/ea6b-prowler-makes-its-final-flight-for-navy.html
  5. Look forward to it. There is so VERY much potential just in the AB212 , which can begat a UH-1N for Tarawas, or USAF spec ops, or anout 25 other users. Yes, i was rather happy to see the model in this thread. You make the first baseline texture, i'll gladly hook you up with the rest.
  6. yes just like the paratroops or LAPES objects. it would be nice to at least do a combat offload like this but as it stands they just sit in the cargobay like the tank and truck objects i made for the Galaxy
  7. ok so most have noticed how i've been working on transports and have even created cargo class weapons for them. I can get such items as a M-60A1 tank into a plane (C-5 obviously) but have not been able to have them do anything except explode when hitting the ground (and yes all entries having to do with explosions are set to 0.0) the main question is how do i set up the objects to appear on ground after leaving the aircraft, or rather make an object shaped crater? mainly i am looking to use stock TW vehicles so lods might not be available othere than through ini calling the M-60(D) aircraft cargo object data.ini as an example [WeaponData001] TypeName=M-60(D) FullName=M-60 Patton ModelName=M60A1 Mass=40000.000000 Diameter=2.090000 Length=2.0000 SubsonicDragCoeff=0.200000 SupersonicDragCoeff=0.770000 AttachmentType=NATO,USAF SpecificStationCode=VehicleStations NationName=USAF StartYear=1960 EndYear=1995 Availability=2 BaseQuantity=5 Exported=TRUE ExportStartYear=1965 ExportEndYear=2000 ExportAvailability=2 WeaponDataType=0 RailLaunched=FALSE Retarded=TRUE FinStabilized=TRUE SpinStabilized=FALSE EffectClassName= DragAreaMultiplier=60.000000 WarheadType=0 Explosives=000.000000 FusingDistance=0.000000 ClusterBomblets=0 ClusterDispersion=0.000000 GuidanceType=0 Accuracy=0 MaxTurnRate=0.000000 MaxLaunchG=0.000000 LockonChance=0 LaunchReliability=0 ArmingTime=0.000000 SeekerFOV=0.000000 SeekerGimbleLimit=0.000000 SeekerTrackRate=0.000000 SeekerRange=0.000000 LiftDragRatio=4.000000 ReleaseAnimationID=1 ReleaseAnimationTime=0.000000 thank you in advance for any help with this. is for a major planned mod to allow all tail loading transports to carry useful vehicles and stop being tasked to carry single rockeyes!
  8. Veltro released a CFM powered Sentry last year. started working on it and it back burnered. original model has all RAF appendages but it was easy to remove the wingtips to make a E-3F and the refuel probe to make a Saudi E-3. is that what you are talking about for newer versions? also have a pod (via fakepilot) for the newer radar on the TF33 powered Sentries but it doesnt fit Veltros model. lookin to redo the Sentry skins and finish Veltros bird anyhow. i have training for two weeks starting next week so out of the loop but evening very free for modding and as said want to complete the skins. want me to shoot you the work i did so far for ini and possible chin fairings work?
  9. as i have read on it the TF33 / JT3D engines had thrust reverse capability while J57 did not. the KC-135E came about from putting better components from retiring 707s (like JT3Ds) onto the KC-135A fleet but mainly the ANG AFRES fleets as they operated from shorter civilian fields and had alot of noise complaints generated compared to mil fields.
  10. skip this Win 8 tomfoolery and sign up for the Insider Program/ Tech Preview. if you don't go that route you should be able to upgrade anyhow next month
  11. Kevin, he was supposed to see how long it took his system to figure that out
  12. hey he could ask it the answer to life the universe and everything.......
  13. Single mission just go bomb a truck convoy over stock Iceland at very low level. Tell us how that goes
  14. have you talked to yakarov or Dels? they are the ones to talk to most recently about helo's period, and you have the model which is a large part of the work. i'd be willing to help you skin them bad boys when ready
  15. also use for KC-135E not A. E model went to ANG and Reserve units given that many of those pilots flew commercial on the side and could convert to using thrust reverser faster. otherwise very awesome. as always thank you sir!
  16. Win 8 or 8.1? And do you have the time to get tge Win Tech Preview?
  17. Doesn't appear NVG compatable.....
  18. Bout time there high speed. It been some exciting times since you dropped off. Your new rig up for a couple of new mods? Got some stuuff to shoot your way so long as it wont catch fire like your old one xD
  19. well thats whats you get for dealing with folks who share an acronym with erectile disfuntion.........
  20. Still love GIBill bennies for Gitmo detainees that got a Congressman looking into it. "Um sir......"
  21. Thank you for the update. For those that read this, we are warned. For those that forget/dont read this, it will be THE END OF THE WORLD. Ok maybe just a confusing time til sites back up :p
  22. Well there has been a trend that is seeing the exclusive to DAT pool of aircrsft dwindle. Thought someone had aViggen working ip here in house?
  23. Why? Everything has its time. As a target drone the Phantom replaced the Sabre for the Navy and the F-102 in the Air Force. While I'd love to have Phantoms Phorever, the QF-16 offers a more modern target, about as much of a leap ahead as the Phantom was for the planes it replaced.
  24. Or escort them. OOOOR send fighters to stop the opfor interceptors inbound. Fighter jocks need something to do other than take photos and make silly movies set in San Diego 1986.....
  25. Last ones now flying at Holoman AFB http://www.tyndall.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123449254
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..