Jump to content

xclusiv8

JAGDSTAFFEL 11
  • Posts

    1,326
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by xclusiv8

  1. Epic moment pureblue!! I love it how your all synced up with the A.I
  2. Nope, not that kind Thank you. I shall try it out.
  3. Then why bother with all this ini work? Why not make a fuel pod that only looks like a recon pod/fuel pod but put it as a fuel pod in the ini?? Or am i out of my mind here?
  4. Those are some beautiful shots Dave. One thing that has always been bugging me is that the pylon that is holding the pod is not entirely connected to the pod. Like this: Is it possible to mod it so that it looks like it is connected fully and not just handing on the front tip.
  5. That is not true. 32bit software can't access your 8gb of ram. It can only use 2gb. Some software can be tweaked so it can access a max of 4gb but that does not include all software. Photoshop for example can only use 3gb with the tweak on a 32bit OS. Even on a 64bit OS the 32bit software does not have access to the 8gb of ram. Well it has access but the software cant use it nor se it. So in the end it's pointless. Then again not many games use more than 1gb of ram and i doubt OFF does that. But dont take my word for it i havent actually measured the amount of ram it uses up. If i would have to guess i would say no more than 800mb.
  6. A question. Do recon pods have any real use in game? Besides dead weight?
  7. Isn't OF 32bit software? In that case it would not help the performance at all.
  8. Mars next!! Imagine if Europe, America, Russia, China, India worked together. We would put people on mars in 10-20 years. It would be a shame if the desire for manned deep space exploration died out. But then again we need some kind of breakthrough in engine technology to make it happen and it seems like its not happening anytime soon.
  9. Does the A.I get any penalties during night time flying? For example for me it is harder to see during night time operations and i have to rely more on my instruments. Dog fighting during night time operations is really hard as well since it is so much easier to loose the target in the darkness. Thanx
  10. Looks like the langoliers have been there already. If i were you i would fly away as fast as i could before they catch you.
  11. You wont see any difference in frames at all.
  12. Epic! Fan vad bra!!! Hoppas du kommer trivas!! Congrats!
  13. MORE PICTURES!!! =D Looking great!
  14. I dont belive TK will ever implement anything that will look even close to what Falcon4 is. He is not trying to make it more realistic. He is happy with what he has.
  15. Thank you!
  16. Leaving? You cant leave yet. You still have ordnance on those wings!!
  17. I never see the A.I do these manouvers you guys see. Mine just go round and round in circles. Dont belive i have ever seen them go verticle. Sometimes they go up and then fast down and keep doing that.
  18. Dont know how the multiple quote thing works. Did it like this instead. Quote: Clearly you misunderstood my point. Maybe it's because english isn't your first language. All I said was the guy is Muslim. He's also a troublemaker. And he did assault a cop. When Randy Cunningham (fighter ace in Vietnam) was caught stealing from his constitutents he was correctly described as an ex-fighter pilot and current congressman. The description of both of these men are correct and factual. Period. Answer: You are correct, English is not my first language. What i am saying is that callimng him Islamic has nothing to do with what he actually is. A troublemaker or terrorist depending on what he has done. Is the Islamic part really necessary? No its not. Its there just to put extra weight on it. The islamic part is not needed to actually describe him and his wrong doings. Quote: No, they say a Catholic priest molests boys. Or just priest. The catholic church is the only religious organization that has priests. It's a given, everyone knows that. Answer: So it would be okey to assume all Catholic priests are child molesters? Because that is what all this is creating? And your view and talk towards muslims shows this. Quote: I nor anyone else is not making either of those two words a bad thing. The people who are committing these crimes are the ones giving Islam a bad name. When was the last time you saw a christian strap on a suicide vest and blow someone up? Maybe your culture is different, but here in the states there's a whole bunch of us who judge people on how good or poorly they treat others. Answer: I agree. The extremist are making it all bad but stamping them makes it worse for the innocent ones. When was the last time you saw a Muslim molest a child? When was the last time you saw a Muslim pick up a gun and kill his parents? When was the last time you saw a Muslim pick up arms and kill his whole class in school? You know what i am talking about and these people were Christian? Should we assume its a Christian problem? No you are stamping and generalizing. Yes most people judge people on how good they are. So skip your here in the states bull crap. 99.9% of all Muslims have done nothing towards you or your nation yet you think it is okey to act this way towards them. Quote: Again, maybe that's how the "western man" in your country operates. Answer: Whats up with you and the we and them attitude? The western man does watch to much tv and does judge on those premises. And you are a great example of this. Quote: I"m saying that this particular individual, in this news article did assault a police officer. Or didn't you read the article? Answer: Yes i said nothing against that. I just commented on the title. Quote: Speak for yourself. In the last 100 years trouble making muslims have cornered the market on terrorism. Deal with it. Answer: I guess you did not read my link. You are wrong on that. Muslims have not done the majority of the terrorist acts in the world. Left and right wing extremist have. You deal with that! You sir believe in lies. Quote: Of course you are, or you would have actually comprehended what the story said. Explain to me where the story is incorrect. Answer: Again all i did was comment on the title. I said nothing about the accuracy or content of the story. Quote: The guy is part of a group that causes trouble in Israel. He dislikes Jews (don't believe me, google him. He's anti-semetic). He's muslim. He assaulted a police officer. He's being deported. Now maybe (again) it's you not understanding english as well as a native english speaker, but nowhere does that article blast all muslims as being bad. You are reading into the article what clearly isn't there. Answer: You dont seem to understand what i was saying. That stamping it as Islamic is something that causes more problem for innocent people than it is describing him and that such a stamp is not needed. It puts weight on something irrelevant. Why is it relevant that he is an Islamic troublemaker? Plz tell me that? And dont give me the muslims doing the most terrorist crap because it is not true. Quote: That's your fault if you refuse to actually read the words and understand only what the words say, because you're putting words into the author of that article's mouth. Period. Answer: Whats up with you and the period parts? Does it make you feel powerful to think you can end a conversation like that? That your word is final? Anyways. I think it is your fault for letting your emotions and your clear hate and prejudice towards Muslims control what you are actually reading. Quote: One more thing: the guy was inciting racial hatred in his speech, which isn't cool in the UK. Why are you so worried about muslims "being offended"? Answer: Have i said anything about people getting offended? No i havent. Again all i stated was that this kind creates HATE towards a group that is not connected to this as hole. You dont seem to be able to comprehend that. I am not worried about anyone being offended. I am worried about people like you creating so much hate towars a group of people that it ends up where we all were 65 years ago. I could give a crap if people get offended. Its not about being offended. Its about creating a bad mindset towards these people that they dont deserve. People are so willing to put all the blame on one group even if 99% of that group has nothing to do with those that actually do the bad things. Quote: I see people being arrested all the time that have similarities to myself. Whether it's religion, skin color, name, whatever. But I don't take it personal because on the outside someone appears similar to me. The fact that he committed a crime and couldn't act right in a civilized society is his fault. It has nothing to do with me. I know many more people who are similar but don't act like that. Answer: I agree. Quote: I'm about fed up with muslims taking things personal solely because they happen to be the same religion as the guy being arrested. Or the guy not acting right. Really? Are practitioners of Islam that emotional? There are hundreds of millions of muslims in the world, so if one muslim does something bad they automatically take offense to the billions of people on this planet branding that one muslim as a troublemaker? If that's the case, then that is their problem. Answer: First, I am not a muslim. My parents are, i myself am an atheist. Second. You still dont understand that i dont give a crap about this guys religion. Everything in this quote is proof of your prejudice towards muslims. Why not just brand him as a troublmaker then? When any christian does a crime do you ever read christan troublemaker did it? Most people in america are christian. Why arent they all stamped with the christian part in the newspapers when they break the law? Christian driver speeded trough school area? No you dont read that. Quote: No one has the right to not be offended. Deal with it, that's how the rest of the grown ups in the world operate. Answer: I am tired of your prejudice towards me and Muslims. You seem to think you are so much better than me or that you comprehend these problems better? There is nothing i need to deal with. It is you who need to deal with your prejudice and hate towards a people you clearly know nothing about. Quote: Since we're on about Islam I'd like to hear from anyone here on the boards that is muslim. I have some questions about how moderate muslims feel. The Koran says that all infidels should be put to the point of the sword. I'm an infidel because I don't believe. Do all moderate muslims agree with what's written in the Koran? Or do they pick and choose what they want to follow much like some christians do in my country? Answer: Show me the parts where the koran says that all says this? Again your lack of knowledge. Islam says to respect your neighbor, not to kill. Not to steal. Not to harm others but help them no matter who they are. The only time the koran talks about killing is when jihad is mentioned. And what is jihad? Jihad is a war towards the religion islam? Such thing does not exist today but yet people like Usama bin laden like to use those words so that weak minded people will follow him. THe only real jihad that has been fought was the one with the templars. How did the crusaders justify their acts? Apparently its in the bible that all need to be converted or die. How do you explain that? According to the bible, slavery is okey. When a slave owner strikes a male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies immediately, the owner shall be punished. But if the slave survives a day or two, there is no punishment; for the slave is the owner's property. (Exod. 21:20-21) Who then is the faithful and wise slave, whom his master has put in charge of his household, to give the other slaves their allowance of food at the proper time? Blessed is that slave whom his master will find at work when he arrives. (Matt. 24:45-46) Or how about human sacrifice? "Take your son, your only son – yes, Isaac, whom you love so much – and go to the land of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains, which I will point out to you." (Genesis 22:1-18) Or burning? "The one who has stolen what was set apart for destruction will himself be burned with fire, along with everything he has, for he has broken the covenant of the LORD and has done a horrible thing in Israel." (Joshua 7:15 NLT) Stoning in the bible. Ops who would have thought? (Deuteronomy 22:23-24 NAB) If within the city a man comes upon a maiden who is betrothed, and has relations with her, you shall bring them both out of the gate of the city and there stone them to death: the girl because she did not cry out for help though she was in the city, and the man because he violated his neighbors wife. Oh wait the bible says kill those that dont listen to priests. Oh snap Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the judge or of the priest who represents the LORD your God must be put to death. Such evil must be purged from Israel. (Deuteronomy 17:12 NLT) So please spare me your lack of knowledge in a field you apparently know nothing about. These religions are not that different as you might think. The problem is the people that enforce them for their own need. I am done with this discussion. All i did was question the need to put "Islamic" in the title. I do not wish to take it further than that. So this is the last post from me in this thread.
  19. So you think being and army general is the same as being a Muslim? Is a work title the same as a faith? Ive read about this Westboro Church people. In not one article did anyone write Christians hate fags. Its a church but they did not target the group called Christians. Christian priests molest boys, did they write Christian troublemaker rapes kid? No they did not. Its a bad seed they say. And what are these people if not people? You are making the word Muslim and Islamic a bad thing by associating it to bad people. Creating even more fuzz around people that are already targeted. You do realize that not all Muslims live in the Arab countries right? Muslims all around the world take crap from people like you just for being Muslim. They do nothing to you. They pay their taxes, they go to work. But the big western man watch to much tv and has to stamp them all as terrorists. And as far as i know. In the western world we have a thing called freedom. They have the right to practice their religion. Marry how they want, live how they want and speak however they want. No law in the world can take that away from them. Respect goes both ways. If you cant respect their ways why should they respect yours? What some muslims in some part refuse...?? Allow me to laugh! HAHA. Are you telling me people in western societies dont assault police officers? Dont make trouble? Do follow these western "norms" and laws? Please spare me the mumbo jumbo. I bet you anything that we westerns do those things on a bigger scale than the so called trouble making Muslims you so want to put the blame on. I am not offended. I just dont like generalization that creates even more hate towards honest people that have nothing to do with this maniac. What i love most is that not even the majority of the terrorist acts around the world are made by fundamentalist Muslims. Only 0.4% of all terrorist acts in europe are done by extremis muslims. The rest is by other groups. 6% in america. The rest is other groups. So how is it that these people get so much crap? Because people watch to much tv and they "STAMP" everyone else. So yeah islamophobia is widespread. Dont belive me? Read the reports from europol. Reports.
  20. I dont see your point. The point i was trying to make was not to categorize all Muslims as being "troublemakers" The guys is a leader of a group that happens to be following their own view of Islam so that they can enforce their views upon others. The problem is that they might refer to the political group but using a stamp will create a certain mindset with the common man that stretches on to regular hard working Muslims around the world. Before 9/11 nobody could care less if you were a Muslim but today if you say you are a Muslim people look at you like you will blow up any second. In this case i find it that a nazi comparison does exactly that. In my view its no different than what the nazis did. They blamed a whole group of people. They stamped them and that stamp went on to be a common view of a man that happened to be of a Jewish heritage. I can bring up other similar situations. My old home country Bosnia. The serbs called the muslims turks. Why? To alienate them and to create a we and them mindset. If you try to fight islam you fight 1.2billion people. If you fight a certain political group in Israel well then you only fight those people.
  21. Why not just call him Sheik the Peacekeeper. It is the newspaper that bring in the religion. Religion is not a stamp. And the more you make it a stamp the more people treat it like that. Nothing good can come of it. Just look at WW2. When Jew was a stamp and only bad things were associated with them because of Nazi propaganda. "Jews destroyed the german economy, we are poor because of the jew" How is this any different? You view the sheik as a Muslim. Why not view him as a man with power. Because that is what he is, a man with power and an agenda. Using religion to make his agenda come true. So yes it is as bad because it does not portray one man it portrays a whole religion as troublemakers. Well that's how the common man views it. "Oh those muslims" people say. They dont say "oh that specific muslim troublemaker". Yes deal with the person, and the stupid idea but leave religion out of it. Militarism has nothing to do with Islam or any religion for that matter.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..