UllyB

I think what he meant is that, for him, the myriads of aircraft already in download section are enough. About the dreaming I think he meant that one can dream what aircraft would like to see built. I don't think he wanted to be rude. He just didn't choose the right words to express himself.

Well, if you put it that way, who am I to contradict you ?

A wise proposition nonetheless, BUT, sorry (sponsor privilege) , these chapters won't be included: Missiles/Transport/Sea planes (except CL-215). The list is already long as it is. Also, entries made previous this discussion, won't make it to the list for the same reason. If your model/idea is backed up by a majority of community, we will try it, unless anyone else find a better solution. I already asked Erik , through our esteemed admin, Wrench, to explore the posibility to extend to 35-40 the applet load. I am still wating for an answer on this matter.

Who are you talking to...? Who is dreaming ?

Taking into consideration these apocaliptic scenarios, it would've been easier to say...99,99% , which, of course is no 100%

"almost likely" ...?

sooo, you stole my idea... Building a plane is child's play compared to a cockpit in TIME units. As I know all cockpit gurus here are busy for years with their cockpit projects. Conclusion: there are few to none available hands on the deck for such task here. Unless one of them owe you a big favor or you can pay them to let their work to do yours, forget about it. You could end the thread here. PS - after every two or three years you will notice that a new cockpit entered the download section and that only if the author is not changing his mind to share it.

I agree that planes which don't exist yet, so there won't be enough credible data to build a model should go. But let here some other opinions before I am using my knife LOL

Folks , there's a problem with the vote system I didn't anticipated. The Website Poll applet allows just 15 item to choose from and there are 33 planes total in the final list, so...instead of complicating things and making at least 2x15 choices (and hopping that none will vote twice different planes LOL) we better make up our minds for a final 15 contestants list. So please take a good look to the preliminary list and let me know what you've decided.If this will be sorted out until Monday (enough time I hope), then we will have a poll Tuesday for two or three days, to let enough time for all to vote. If there is a better solution I would like to hear it.

LOOL

More BONUS moments

Kevin that was a real good. I laughed my arse off! :)))) "Talibans on desk jobs" !! :))))

Ta-daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...

I know, that's me.

You shouldn't be surprised, they are ..Talibans, that's what they do, they expand like a gas and kill people, blow themselves up etc if any newcomer to Strike Fighter 2 series let them out. In Strike Fighter 1 series this issue is secured, through a workaround made by me: if they try to run out of Afghanistan map they, automatically are transformed in...goats and goats can be easy to kill (you just strafe with your plane's cannon) And NO, there is no way to solve this. Once they escape in the world they won't exit and gather all in Afghanistan unless you reset the game and then the pc, in this precise order ;) Otherwise their number is doubling on the map.

Oh, I see. It seems that I missunderstood your first message. My apology Sir.

Guys, thanks a lot for help. I passed the material.

Good news folks, the SU-34 is back into the game, today I had the confirmation. But I need a hand and as I know you , you will all help. Please give me all you've got as important reference info I should take into consideration (photos, schemes, important technical details that one must take into consideration when building the 3D model etc). I need them quickly to pass them to the team responsible for it. The sooner I have them, the sooner the plane will be finished ;) Thank you in advance

Check these things, maybe they will help pinpointing the issue: - in the campaign data.ini file, 1) is the plane syntax written correct ? 2) is asigned a squadron to the respective plane ? 3) is the correct nation designated for the plane ? - in campaign INI file, 1) is created a squadron which match the campaign data.ini file entry for it ? 2) is the correct StartDate for the selected plane ? 3) Does the name of the selected plane match the one from campaign data.ini file ? 4) Are the UnitID entries in chronological order ? Check that

Don't mention it

To see a weapon on your plane needs more things to be checked and in order than you might think. These are some common errors beginners oftenly do: - The 3D model is not present in weapons folder - The syntax is wrong in some of the needed files - The weapon declaration/syntax is missing from a plane's pylon - one didn't pay attention that some weapons are specific to some pylons/aircraft and only ! Always, if something looks wrong, first take a look, in weapon editor for STATION CODE box!