Jump to content

SayethWhaaaa

MODERATOR
  • Posts

    3,976
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by SayethWhaaaa

  1. Super Sylph???????
  2. Tsk tsk LeL. I've sent you a PM dude. Also like what you've done with the nozzles. Love the Pig!
  3. Always love seeing what you come up with Veltro.
  4. Governments only learn the lessons of the last wars fought. This wouldn't be so bad if the next operation resembles the last one exactly, but they never do. Focusing on airlift and air support seems to be all the rage along with buying into stealth. I'm finding too many governments are relying on stealth to be some kind of panacea for all things military and are going to have a big shock when they realise their new (Euro) $150 million stealth planes aren't able to fight terrorism or keep the peace any better, or cheaper than existing aircraft...
  5. Love it! Reminds me a lot of the old ADRU Mirages here.
  6. The things people will do to see a Typhoon or 2...
  7. Just a suggestion, add a fourth option for "Who gives a rat's ass" next time. I'm so sick of SueBo!
  8. He spent a good 30ish years in the UK doing theatre. Apparently he was quite the thespian. And some VO work.
  9. Yeah, I think I had the game installed for all of 1 day and I'd already knocked it over. That's good to know about Blops because I've had it running poorly since the previous patch, very jerky, lots of micro pauses. Before that, it was fine though. Oddly enough, I have that very same problem with Homefront during combat or when a script kicks in. And since it's a script based game, it's happening A LOT! Heh. However, when I play BF:BC2 or I play BF2 with the bots cranked up to 160+, still runs smoother than an android's ass. Go figure.
  10. Is it just me or does this game just suck hard? It had a slick marketing campaign, but that's about all I've found impressive so far. Even the game it was derived from, Frontlines: Fuel of War seems more impressive despite some truly awful acting. I dunno. Maybe I'm just being picky, but COD4 and GRAW 2 set the standard for me and very little has come close since IMO.
  11. I do dig the background you do Spinners.
  12. For helicopters, there are usually 3 to 4 engine entries, usually entered in the UH-60_data.ini as: [Engine3] SystemType=PROP_ENGINE InputName=THROTTLE_CONTROL EngineID=3 SLPowerDry=158834.1 ThrustAngles=0.0,0.0,0.0 ThrustPosition=0.0,0.0,0.0 ThrottleRate=0.5 AltitudeTableNumData=10 AltitudeTableDeltaX=7000 AltitudeTableStartX=0.0 AltitudeTableData=1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0 TSFCM0=0.90 TSFCM1=1.26 SpinnerNodeName=Shaft StaticPropNodeName=Rotors SlowPropNodeName=SlowRotor FastPropNodeName=SlowRotor SlowPropRPM=500 FastPropRPM=1000 MaxPropRPM=1200 IdlePropRPM=300 BSFC=0.00298 ExhaustEmitterName=CleanExhaustEmitter ExhaustPosition=-1.3053,-2.4138,1.8914 FireSuppression=FALSE ; new entries AnimationID= MaxPowerAnimationTime=-1 MinPowerAnimationTime=-1 PropRotationDirection= ReversePropOrientation=FALSE ConstantSpeedProp= FALSE NumBlades=5 PropDiameter=5.0 <<--------------------------------------------------------------------- EDIT THIS Make sure this number is smaller than 8.0 or 8.1. MomentOfInertia=2.25 PropEfficiencyAdvanceRatioTableNumData=7 PropEfficiencyAdvanceRatioTableDeltaX=0.2 PropEfficiencyAdvanceRatioTableStartX=0.0 PropEfficiencyAdvanceRatioTableData=0.041,0.40,0.70,0.82,0.78,0.50,0.00 I'm pretty sure you need to keep it under 8.1 for the rotors to begin working again. Also, this is subjective, but if you get sick of the disc looking fast prop animation (for when the rotor is at speed) look for these entries within the Engine 3 and 4 sections: SlowPropNodeName=SlowRotor FastPropNodeName=FastRotor <<----------- Change this to match the SlowRotor entry and you'll have rotors that spin without that rotor disc look. It's not important to do this, but you might find it looks better.
  13. lol... But you know what? He looks suspiciously like Dr. Hartman too.
  14. Fantastic! My Kahus were looking slightly out of place in Darwin. :p
  15. Yeah, happy birthday lads!
  16. Least they have a toilet in the sucker!
  17. Preeeeetty!
  18. Wish I could grab airsoft stuff here. It's illegal to sell and illegal to import them here. I'd love an M-14/M-14EBR.
  19. Haha, "Chopper says 'Harden up!" lol!
  20. For a while there, it seemed like this issue was going to be put into the legal "too hard basket". Good to see this was addressed and the tool was prosecuted. Really hoping he's forced to drop the soap in the first few days of his sentence. Troll jailed for posting child porn on tribute pages for dead children. The really interesting thing about this particular issue is this. Around about the time this happened, there were several examples of trolls causing this kind of trouble both here in Oz and abroad, this was one of the later examples. Because of the nature of the offence, this story was splashed across the headlines of the commercial media, papers, websites, TV, so on. I'm curious to see how many copycats would have actually engaged in this kind of behaviour if earlier examples weren't publicised as they were.
  21. Just for the record, although the show is called "A Current Affair", it and it's equally inbred cousin on ch 7: Today Tonight, are NOT current affairs programs. They are strictly light entertainment programs posing as current affairs programs. They're both in hot water for this, particularly TT for 'cashing' in on this event by giving the bully air time. It's purely a shameless ratings grab by both ch 7 and 9. Their normal staples are constant stories about how boat people are a threat to Australia, single mums soaking up welfare, dodgy tradesman, conmen, new 'wonder drugs', paid advertorials and other beat ups. They never fact check and are strict followers of the cheque book journalism ethos. Rugg, would love to have had you on my hockey team back in high school. We could have used that on one of our checking lines.
  22. Damn I miss that show. This would be over tomorrow if Prime Minister Hacker was in charge!
  23. What you guys need is some kind of ship, a big flat one that can carry some kind of aircraft. Your Tornados and Typhoons nor even Rafales would be able to land on it I suspect, so you're going to need some kind of aircraft that can land in short distances, maybe even vertically if the seas are a bit choppy. ...hang on. Oh yeah... that's right. Heh... awkward. Damn straight. Took long enough.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..