Jump to content

Stary

MODDER
  • Posts

    8,500
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    100

Everything posted by Stary

  1. Surely, let's roll Umm... I'm screwed then... Ok, I can be the A-36 pilot that sacrifices in the middle for no reason. Epic Michael Bay music, me down in flames, and a flashback of me and my Grandpa (WW1 Austro-Hungarian NCO vet in RL!) at sunset (M.Bay style!!!) No scenes with Wojtek!!! Bears scare the sh*t out of me, aswell as dogs... The accent... ok, it's midwar story, he's good character, ends up proposing to Rihanna... I like it! May we develop Vic as a funny comedy relief in this? As in "Oh s**t I dropped one!"? Blake Edwards style? (sorry Harold!) Dot! "Based on true events" my a*s... We develop JM's character into torn-inside-out by his morality and the oatch one... He screams "Noooooooooo!" with all the V-2s (it's in the States, post war) blowing up in the background, again, sunset... Then you stab him with a paperclip... Can I take the sex scene? He's not home, you know... He lives? Or we go Tarantino?
  2. JM, I'm talking about community made flick, remember?
  3. green screen JM, green screen ;)
  4. naa, I like the trailer, I liked the original Tuskegee Airmen film, right now, the CGI is the way to go. Exagerrated? Sure. But the more aerial battles the better. What was last decent WW2 (or any dogfights conflict) depicted? Pearl Harbour? Flyboys? Red Baron? Of the three Red Baron was closest to actual "feel" of the air combat and flight in general IMO (mind you, I've only flown prop planes few times in RL as a cargo next to pilot) but was waay off historic-wise for story telling reasons. Think of it, every new movie about fighters spawns new rookie flightsimmer somewhere edit: I can spot many things that seem off in the trailer (which is well, just a movie trailer with all the post-production going on right now, CGI including) from 262s camo to 103s tracers smoke shape, but how many of the actual viewers will notice, will be aware of that? Or we gather some 50+ million bucks and do our own vision of it? I can take the red shirt part
  5. EricJ and others like C5 made few very good reviews on other blogs in the past, maybe we should do part of the viral marketing ourselfs? @Brain32: I agree with most of your post, FM is there, maybe more advanced engine simulation like mentioned flameouts (Mig Alley had it done well... some 12 years ago) and such, stalls, spins are quite ok now as these are, but that's part of the (good IMO) FM, what SF lacks is the ground/naval warfare part, maybe some bit refined carrier ops too for Tomcat (or Linebackers) (I still can't shake off that poor catapult guy I sucked into engine in Digital Integration's Super Hornet, again 10 years old title)
  6. she's ex-nun, don't ask...
  7. either stand alone or as DLC I'll get it, simple as it is. I somehow tied my life, my activities with the series, this great community of ours and the man himself for the past 6 years. It's a hobby, addictive one. I really don't need military-grade AWG-9 fidelity to enjoy it, I know many would like to, but let's face it, TK's approach (deliberately!) is quite different than that of Eagle Dynamics or... ummm... that would be only one competitor past ~1970s jet planes currently on the market. Side note: TK really really needs some advertising on the net, typical response among RL flight simmers I know, active for past 10-15 years is "Strike Fighters? Never heard of..."
  8. sorry, no outsourcing!
  9. Alles Gute mein Freund!!! Have a great one!
  10. lol liamp51
  11. (Ok, I have had extensive studies with a human models at University of Technology of Cracow, but that was painting ((rarely oil, mostly acrylic)) and charcoal sketches) I tried some low light level photo works with my girlfriend:
  12. too many clouds for old systems I guess
  13. What Eric said, ok, Scooters all the way (hey! I'm a Scooter fanboy!) also Mirage with Matras and FT/RP mix is good addition too. Haven't yet purhased no.4 Hunter, can't think of plausible scenarios in my installs for it though. My dream: DLC #9 code update: custom true 3D lod-based Tod files, DLC #10 code update: switchable restricted to hud/reflector glass gunsight... dream on... (c'mon TK, that's not that big deal for you!)
  14. actually it tends to rapidly move nose down when all barrels are lit
  15. CVNAF, by default the accuracy remains unchanged until you add the tweaked (with the mentioned accuracy modifier) ini yourself
  16. still have the dark-blue manual book on my shelf (oh, they were actually adding books to flight sims back then )
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..