Nesher 628 Posted February 28, 2016 (U.S. Air Force graphic) http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2016/02/26/air-force-unveils-initial-b-21-long-range-bomber-design.html The B-2 has a baby boy :P 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MigBuster 2,884 Posted February 28, 2016 I name this ship the Spirit II 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yubba 70 Posted February 28, 2016 (edited) B-21 Black Jack. or for you old farts Bingo. Edited February 28, 2016 by yubba Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+76.IAP-Blackbird 3,557 Posted February 28, 2016 Great! We have it already in our Download section Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Viggen 644 Posted February 28, 2016 Wraith Or LeMay Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Jimbib 747 Posted February 28, 2016 Wraith Already a nickname for something else apparently. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+76.IAP-Blackbird 3,557 Posted February 28, 2016 B-21 Bob Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Gunrunner 314 Posted February 28, 2016 21 as in B-2.1, 2+1, 21st century, 21 B-2 built or $21 billion for the development contract ? Also, anyone notices anything about the engines on this concept drawing ? I'm sure it's going to drastically reduce costs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ironroad 218 Posted February 29, 2016 (edited) B-21 Full Budget Appropriations? B-21 FWA B-21 Contract Steering B-21 Golden Parachute B-21 OIG Edited February 29, 2016 by ironroad 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fallenphoenix1986 603 Posted March 1, 2016 (edited) In keeping with the title of its older brother how about "Wraith" or "Spectre"? Craig Edited March 1, 2016 by fallenphoenix1986 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JediMaster 451 Posted March 1, 2016 It was already mentioned that the new bomber would most likely be twin-engined instead of 4. Seeing as we have the 777 out there with two engines there's no reason a bomber can't have two as well. However, seeing as they bizarrely didn't go with B-3 (I guess we're to assume they had 18 other designs that were made on paper/virtually that got passed over), I still think 21 is wrong. Looking at this, it's a B-2.1 for sure. MAYBE B-2.5. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Gunrunner 314 Posted March 1, 2016 Considering how previous bomber programs went and the development hell of most programs since the 80's, I'd say B-21 White Elephant... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Typhoid 231 Posted March 4, 2016 "MAYBE B-2.5." heh heh Mitchel 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
