Erik

The more you think about this the worse it gets. They actually want us to believe that NK has the minds and internet ability it takes to pull this off. If they have public internet wouldn't that be completely opposite of the repression that NK is famous for. Smells fishy now with a whole bunch of shade. I don't believe much in conspiracy theories but ... The real story is out there somewhere.

Won't be the first movie to go straight to DVD and Pay-per-view. I think it would have been comical even if it wasn't a box office smash. Giving into these guys isn't the right move either, just goes to say everyone has their price. I'd isolate NK from the internet so fast it would make your head spin.

The bottom line here is we operate on a system of trust. If you use someone's work make sure you credit them. If you need permission to use their work make sure you ask. If you decide you're going to take all the policies in place and substitute them with your own person idea of right and wrong you'll find yourself in these situations. If you want to release your work and be recognized for it all we ask is that you follow the clear and easy to understand rules for doing so. If you do not we won't support your efforts or your claims. It's actually very simple and has worked for many years. Please don't think you're just going to jump in an upset the apple cart because you feel you're entitled to something. This community is about respect, mutual appreciation, and having the maturity and honor to present your work in such a way as so everyone can appreciate it. If that's not going to be how you operate I'll suspend your ability to upload files. It's as simple as that. As to your question. I don't believe the file exists yet. It appears to be a work in progress. Any further concerns can be addressed to me in Private Message. Thank you all for your help and I now return you to your regularly scheduled programming. Erik

This is gearing up to be the battle royale of the millenium. This changes the rules to everything and can't be allowed to happen. This is like buying a sandwich. You paid for it and you sit down to eat it. Open it and the bread wants to charge you for carrying the bacon, the lettuce wants to charge you for keeping the bacon dry, and the tomato wants to charge you because we eat too many tomatoes. If the USA falls to this the entire World will follow. This is where the fabric of what we have starts to unravel and soon it will be a bunch of people taking their toys and going home. Imagine Microsoft or Google going dark tomorrow because they refuse to be extorted like Netflix, or Wikipedia going dark because they can't pay their bandwidth bill. It's a fucking reality and these politicians and world leaders need to stand up against it. Imagine when consumers finally get enough of it and go back to actually going to lunch with real people and not tweeting about it. Back to the stone age people over the greed of Verizon and Comcast. LEAVE THE INTERNET ALONE - LEAVE NET NEUTRALITY IN PLACE

Resolved.

I pulled it. It's being reworked. Thanks.

I'm making progress on our end. I need to contact you privately so I'll send you a private message PM and we'll continue this conversation there. Thanks.

Okay let me see what I can come up with. Thank you for the information. Support ticket filed with our ISP.

Coupi - I want to help so I need some more information from you or it's going to be really hard. I need to see a trace route from your computer to ours. Open a command window and at the prompt type "tracert combatace.com" just like Cliff7600 did above. I've done some preliminary testing but without a route structure to you my ISP can't contact the upstream. We're on a 10GBs down 1GBs up port which is equivalent to 125Mbs up in theory so speed shouldn't be an issue. Here's a test result from our machine. Give me the above information and I'll get it to them so they can do the research. Thanks.

That's just weird not a single router responded to an ICMP request until you got to us. 156ms to us from France is really good. I'm surprised your speeds would be slow. Have you contacted your ISPs about this and if so what did they say?

From all our families to yours. Have a happy and festive thanksgiving filled with family, football, and friends. Be safe out there. Happy Thanksgiving!

In the second one I see a timeout error, that's packet loss which means slow connection speeds. Can you trace route to us and provide the output? Do the same thing as you did to ping but instead type C:> tracert combatace.com Then provide the results. Thank you.

Ec There's different ways to mitigate this problem. Certainly restoring to a backup is one of them. In my past experience it's been hit and miss and not always foolproof. I always recommend slaving the drive and scanning it first, then restoring as needed if available.

As a side note. If you can remove the hard drive and connect it to another machine and then scan that drive by itself it will usually detect anything on that drive since the OS and malware isn't loaded. Since you're just connecting the drive to another machine that machine will just recognize the drive as a bunch of files on another disk. Also this type of scan is much faster and much more reliable. Most antivirus have the ability to scan just a single location and in your case it would be the new drive you attached which is the suspect drive. If that's not an option for you most antivirus will have a boot disk that can do the same thing but without having to load any part of the OS. These would be my recommended solutions regardless of which antivirus you use most of them will handle it just fine. If the scan comes back negative then you can consider verifying (repairing) the OS with an install disk. Lastly would be the restore method as this is usually not an option anyway as malware usually shuts that down on first run. If you try to restore and there are no restore points or if it's turned off you'll know you've got malware on your machine. The Last Hail Mary should be reloading an operating system and if you do that backup first, zero the drive, then reload. Hope that helps, good luck.

Coupi - I put in a trouble ticket for this. Routing to you from us has some issues in the transatlantic hop but I have no idea why we're routing that way unless you're on a DSL line. Either way it appears it's in the carryover to Europe which is totally out of our hands. I'll see what our upstream can tell me, don't hold your breath though it's beyond them as well. Thanks.

Look I'm tired of arguing with you over this. Don't take my word for anything. Read it for yourself. Certainly you can't and won't discredit Harvard University. http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/01/so-who-owns-the-internet/ Deuces

All I can do is shake my head at this point. In the 1980s the National Science Foundation. [1][2] Funding continues to date to upgrade and modernize routes for use. Yes their is private involvement but not at the level of the government. (BTW this is a world wide philosophy not just specific to the USA) However, if you believe that any internet traffic isn't monitored by the government and the NSA [3] doesn't watch every bit that transitions our networks then I'd like to sell you the Washington Memorial. The infrastructure was built by design with national security and defense in mind. You don't get that without the word Federal and that means taxpayer dollars. If you call the latency of satellite acceptable by all means buy it. [4] [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Science_Foundation [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Agency [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_Internet_access *specifically look at the part about latency and it being roughly 20 times slower than land based systems

The real shame is that senseless dig at some obscure point that somehow the services satellite provide are equivalent to the high speed network and fiber optic connection system we the tax payers already built.

Holy eye rage. They're burning. You poor lads in the UK.

You're not taking flack for anything that I'm aware of. As a political representative you certainly have to have a thick skin when it comes to debating a topic. That said to what esteemed position have you been elected?

Given my age that's a very broad stroke with a pen there. I'm very involved in a lot of things, this one just has merit and substance here. I don't care how their voices are heard I only care that everyone gets the option before they get handed the bill.

Your storage limit is a function of your member type. Since you're a new member you have a smaller storage space. With time and posts your member status will change and your storage space will increase.

If you don't want to get involved this image may be very real sooner than you think. Join us here. We need your vote to tell congress, federal government, and big business, NO. http://combatace.com/topic/84316-net-neutrality-urgent/page-4?do=findComment&comment=679973

Don't let congress or the FCC fool you into believing that they are interested in protecting the internet. Tell congress now that they need to leave the basic principles of the internet in place. We do not need congressional oversight, federal oversight, or big business oversight. The internet belongs to each and every one of us. We've already started to compromise it's basic ideas and freedoms. We need to stand together and say no, the rest of the free nations are depending on us, we are depending on us. Take a stand let your voice be heard. Signature needed: Tell Congress you're not fooled by Comcast's lies. It takes less than a minute. Net neutrality is not a partisan issue. Since the Internet was built it's been based on a few basic principles: like the idea that everyone's data should move at the same speed, and no government or corporation should interfere or decide what you can see and do online. That's not a liberal or conservative idea. It's just a good idea. Everyone from venture capitalists to environmentalists support it. [1] But now that we're potentially days away from getting a rule to prevent Cable company F*$kery, monopolies like Comcast and Verizon are doubling down on manipulating the process: they're calling in all their favors in Congress by tapping the offices of everyone they donated to. [2] And, it's working. Despite net neutrality being obvious policy, their pals in Congress are working to screw things up again by making this into a partisan circus, and unleashing Cable propaganda. All to take focus away from the facts: the Internet has thrived with net neutrality for 20 years, and we need to keep the net neutral to keep it awesome. Tell Congress you're not fooled by Comcast's lies and won't tolerate partisan nonsense. Click here to take action. Fortunately, the public isn't fooled. We know that net neutrality is not "regulating the Internet." It's just ground rules that PREVENT mega-corporations like Comcast and governments from regulating the Internet in their own interest. This Friday is the last day for the FCC to come out with a proposal for full Title II reclassification. If they don't, part of the blame rests with Congress, who have been muddying the waters on this issue even though there is a clear public consensus. Sign the petition to your lawmakers: tell them you're not fooled by lies or partisan politics and you want them to support real net neutrality. We're close. Really close. But this fight is going to get uglier before we win. FOIA'd documents that were just released show just how deep the rabbit hole goes, and just how cozy the relationship between the FCC and the telecoms really is. [3] Stay vigilant. Check your facts. Don't believe everything you read on the Internet and DEFINITELY don't believe what you see on Cable TV. We've come this far -- we've taken Title II reclassification from something that was impossible to something that now seems nearly inevitable. We're ready to take it home and we're proud to have you on the team. We put together a quick website as an easy resource to counteract Cable lies about net neutrality. Check it out and share! https://www.donttrustcable.com/ Let us know if you have other Cable lies we should debunk there. [1] Battle for the Net. https://www.battleforthenet.com/#team-internet [2] Furnas, Alexander and Lee Drutman. "How telecoms and cable have dominated net neutrality lobbying". Sunlight Foundation. http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2014/05/16/how-telecoms-and-cable-have-dominated-net-neutrality-lobbying/ [3] Leopold, Jason. "Net neutrality emails reveal cozy 'social network' between FCC and telecoms". Vice Magazine. https://news.vice.com/article/net-neutrality-emails-reveal-a-cozy-social-network-between-the-fcc-and-telecoms

LOL the link takes you to your attachments and is different for everyone, meaning you see yours they see theirs. You deleted my link.