FastCargo

You go boy! FC

As far as the CFTs go, realize there were actually several versions of the CFTs made. The CFTs that the C model can carry are different from the CFTs that the E model carries. Things like mounting of the A2A missiles and A2G pylons. That was one of the changes made in the Eagle model upgrades that have been posted here. The E model pretty much never flies without the CFTs (it has flown without them, but it's very rare, and usually for specific events/cases). The C models on the other hand almost never fly with the CFTs. The Iceland (and maybe Alaska) guys were the units that flew with them on a fairly regular basis, but I think they've stopped doing that. FC

Well, sir, you aren't cool... ...if you tell an F-16 pilot how his plane flies based solely flying a PC flight simulator. As I stated in my blog post. Now, on the other hand, if you personally can chat with a Deuce pilot about what he does nowadays, I'm pretty sure you have some credibility there. But far be it from me for a Major to advise a Colonel on what he did or did not say... FC

Actually, no. Both versions are grey...the C model is a lighter grey, the E model a darker grey. FC

Outstanding pic Fubar...I remember that model very well. FC

Because this info may not be seen in the RAZBAM forum, I'd figured I'd let folks know here. http://forum.combatace.com/topic/50610-once-in-a-lifetime-offer-only-for-strike-fighters-series-fans/ All inclusive sale, all RAZBAM SF series products for $20.00 total. Only for 72 hours, starting at 0100Z, 7 Dec 09. Before anyone asks, some of the products may be for older versions of the SF series, and so may need tweaks to be fully updated to SF2I standards. Consult the RAZBAM part of the forums to make an informed buying decision and ask questions if needed. FC

The GBU-32 was planned to be released with the F-15SE...but I could pass it along to KillerBee since he's working on a SF2 weps pack. In either case, none of my weapon models would be nearly as detailed. FC

NEHENGO had one in work a long time ago. I have the fuselage of one that was in work a while ago...haven't done anything to it since though. FC

The F-35B hovers just fine...if you're good at it. FC

Well, no kidding there sherlock...not like we don't get those briefings either. Do you really think we don't think about this stuff? Seriously? Having the information and being able to do something useful about it are two different things. FC

Burn the heretic! Naw, seriously, I have no idea....I'd be curious because it would be one less thing I have to worry about carrying... FC

If I had to take a guess, I'd say that the AB effects in the SF1 model are out of date. Recommend going to the model's data.ini and renaming the effect to a generic effect other stock SF2 aircraft use. A secondary guess may be there are invisible 'links' the aircraft have that use a completely clear TGA file that is in the main aircraft's directory, and so those links now show up. That completely clear TGA file may now have to be put into each texture directory. FC

Great, now I gotta protect my crotch around here even... FC

satish, You really don't know the average fighter pilot...from your forces or ours. See, having flown with and instructed IAF (including a Su-30MKI pilot), USN, and USAF pilots, let me tell you a few things: 1) Fighter pilots are some of the most self critical guys I know. Don't let the swagger fool you. They take all threats VERY seriously, and will promptly hand you your ass in the debrief if you aren't on your "A" game during the fight. Combat aircraft pilots don't treat this as a flying club...but as deadly serious business. They spend HOURS in the vault, studying threats, tactics, strategies...they'll make up crap that's never been tried to win. Denial? Hardly. 2) Why do you insist on selling your pilots short? Having flown with "Bops" and "Sandy", 2 IAF pilots currently on separate T-38 exchange tours (yes, they are instructing pilots in the USAF on how to fly the T-38), I can tell you that both were professional. Were they godlike? No. Did they suck? No. Pretty much middle of the road...with maybe a slight handicap learning how we do things in the USAF. I wouldn't have expected any different from your Su-30MKI deployed unit. 3) The best professional aviators always train harder than they expect to fight. The idea is that if training is so hard, actual combat will be like clubbing baby seals. So, yes, you won't get to use all your toys during training...the idea is to make it harder on yourself. 4) Finally, one last thing as far as intel goes. There are several civilian and US government owned Su-27s and MiG-29s. Heck, we get to play against them on a semi regular basis. Even have a couple of MiG-29s in the USAF Muesum. Now, I'll be the first to admit I could be wrong...I've just never heard of such a thing as a F-15, F-16, F-18, F-22 or F-35 in a Russian or Chinese museum. FC

Done. Rest In Peace Mr. Todd. FC

Awesome stuff! Sometimes it really does take a non-aviator to convey that feeling...pilot types tend to be too technical... FC

Screenshot please. FC

Also, certain HDTVs come with a VGA input already (Samsungs). Like other's have said, an HDTV to do actual computer work in isn't that great. However, as a game/sim/video playing monitor, it works awesome. FC

People need to understand the difference between KIAS/KCAS and KTAS/GS and how they relate to Mach. FC

Be careful asking for engine sounds. I find that: A) Most commerical microphones don't have the range to record the sound well (lots of scratches). B) The same engine can sound very different depending on which aircraft it is installed in. An example was someone was asking to release a version of my T-38 with the J85 sound from a Canadian Tutor. VERY different engine sounds...mainly due to the different intake designs. FC

One thing that might simplify your life as far as effects go is make as many weapons as possible use the stock effects (exhaust, explosion, etc). That way, it's optimized for lower end systems and folks can add effects packs that won't conflict with the weapons pack. Obviously, this may not be an option for those weapons that are specialized (nukes). I've been tending with my aircraft releases to gear them as much as possible to a dead stock install. That way, the baseline is always the same, everyone can use the release and tweak it up as necessary. Something to consider. FC

KB, I echo TurtleHawk's comments. Keep it simple for the end user. Include all the effects needed. Maybe make period specific weapon packs (WWII vs post WWII). Also, I would make inert weapons optional. I wouldn't use an installer, but keep it drag and drop...makes for more control by the end user, while still keeping it simple. The big problem I could see are folks with merged vs non-merged installs. I'd first find out what's different weapon wise between each of the SF2 version sims (back in the Gen 1 sims, WOI had different weapons, SFP1/WOV/WOE otherwise all had the same weapons - I'd assume it's similiar in the SF2 series). You might have to make a SF2I specific pack. Also, maybe try to keep the naming nomenclature as close to stock as possible...that way your weaponpack won't 'break' stock installs. And standardize the nomenclature, with things like having "AGM-86A, AGM-86B, AGM-86C" vs "AGM-86, AGM86B, AGM-86C". Speaking of which, eliminate rundundancy where possible. I've seen installs where it's the exact same weapon, but has 2 separate designations (one NATO, one non-NATO)...maybe use one specific designation with the other name in parhenthesis. Get rid of older versions of weapons if newer, nicer versions are available (the Hellfire is a prime example). Make sure the weapons dimensions match the LODs. The LGBs are a prime example of a mismatch (I posted something in the KB about that a while ago....). And all you wanted was some suggestions... Anyway, that's a lot so I'll shut up now. Feel free to do anything with the weapons I've created of course, you can even include the SA-5 launcher and radar if you want. I look forward to your weapons pack Gunny! FC

http://forum.combatace.com/topic/43234-how-to-make-a-sf2-aircraftweapon-useable-in-gen-1-thirdwire-sims/ FC

Darrin, I'm not sure what you are asking. Please, can you be more specific in what you want to know? FC

File is unapproved due to not giving credit to the original author. Read the rules in the Freeware accords before attempting to use someone else's work. FC