FastCargo

Get better soon...we'll be here when you get back! FC

Us too, it was really starting to get interesting. Plus, since T4 didn't do that well at the box office, pretty much killed any possibility of renewal. FC

Dollhouse is already back, they've been showing the new season eps for some time. TSCC on the other hand is done. FC

Actually, you don't need to move the CAT file. Gerwin's extractor will create a directory named "Cat File" and dump all the extracted files into it. Example, if you wanted to extract Objectdata10.cat, you simply drag the CAT file over the Cat extractor. Windows will ask if you want to run the Cat extractor, once you click Yes, a Command Line window will pop up, and Windows will create a directory called Objectdata10, then dump all the extracted files into it. It will even create subdirectories where appropriate. Easy as pie. FC

I'm pretty sure we have the F-15s covered. http://forum.combatace.com/topic/45664-eagles-gone-wild/page__st__60__p__332465entry332465 Maybe you want to try modeling something a little simpler first. FC

Oh come on, just ask! FC

What Fubar said....there is a thread on the ThirdWire forums about it. FC

There is no trojan in that pack, I've scanned it myself and all the individual files inside with several programs. It has been downloaded over 3600+ times, and not one person says there is a trojan in it. We take this kind of stuff VERY seriously here. Secondly, any aircraft can use any cockpit if you know what you are doing. Check the Knowledge Base for details. FC

Ah...so there IS something different in the code.... FC

Well, for 3rd party, I can understand because they haven't been made to SF2 standards. But for stock aircraft? I guess I don't see the point. If all your stock aircraft have built in drop tanks, I wouldn't have any separate external drop tank LODs, and I'd get rid of any asymetrical references...makes life easier. Not doubting what you are saying, just surprised it still is done that way. FC

There is nothing wrong with that file except for the fact that it's old. And by the way, have you looked in our downloads section lately? There are a ton of MiG-23s for download. FC

Basically, the problem is that the military has to be subservient to the political arm of the US Government (in the case of lawful orders), otherwise that opens up a very dangerous door. However, what if that government goes directly against the Constitution of the United States? For instance, the oath of enlistment in the US Armed Forces: "I,(your name) do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." Note that there are a few possibilities of conflict within the oath. What if the executive or legistative branch oversteps it's bounds Constitutionally? Who interprets that? From the oath, it could be down to the individual. Baltika, I like this idea...but I'd have to agree with EricJ, I'd say it would be chaos at the individual bases for a while... FC PS And the 100th FTS is my old unit...til they took it away from us....grrrr....

Okay, if there's a Xac and Xmac...what's the difference. The old definition I read for Xac sounded just like the definition you wrote for Xmac.... FC

Thanks for that Ed, I had seen those values in newer stock aircraft, but weren't quite sure what they meant... Also, quick question...is it Xac or Xmac? I saw old FMs that had it as Xac (and they did have an effect). Also, unlike other table data which appear to be coefficients, the entries I saw seem to be absolute values. FC

This release is for SF2 and SF2E. It is NOT for WOE. FC

Listen to Ed, you should, hmmm? FC

I'm honestly surprised there is a LOD for the tanks. Now that the fuel tanks can be incorporated into the model, there should be no reason to have separate LODs...or even a call out for different tanks. In fact, for the F-5B, the call out for the wingtip tanks is the same one for either side, even though the actual LOD for the tanks are mirror images incorporated into the F-5B model. FC

While testing damage textures, I died, but my wingman didn't: Head on gun pass against a Framer...nice! FC

Porpoise? You know, I could have so seen that jet with that nickname...or maybe 'Flipper'... Come on, we've had Aardvarks, Stinkbugs, Rhinos, Lawn Darts, Warthogs.... FC

Wow! He just rocks! FC

071006? Far as I know, unless you're a diehard multiplayer fan or a dedicated prop head, no one runs a 06 patch level install. And not being able to select years? That makes even less sense...unless you are only playing custom single missions or campaigns. FC

Well, the A-10 is an older model. Secondly, which sim, what patch level, which terrain. And what years are you flying? FC

Yep, that'll work...folks can always scale back. FC

Let's go with ADC grey...that's what I had planned on. I don't think it would have looked as nice because of the different metals that would have been used in construction. FC

Well, there really isn't that much in terms of reference because it never got past mockup stage. Any paint schemes shown have been projections based on ADC paintjobs of the day. Besides the books I have (of which most photos are of the mockup), most other references I googled. Your work is real nice, if you're interested, I can get the F-108 to you tonite. FC