-
Posts
9,002 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
174
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by daddyairplanes
-
will shoot you the Viper excel and a folder of pics on sunday fun fact on the 497ths Phantoms: at least one of them went on to be converted to F-4G specs, one of the late last batch converted in the late 80s
-
F-4 serials (version 1).xlsx check the page "F-4E 88", it'll have the serials ive tracked so far F-4Ds were almost all in the ANG/Reserves by 85, and F-4Cs were solidly in the ANG by then, with many units sending theirs to the boneyard for Ds or Es. the only Active duty Ds were at Homestead's 31st TTW, which became a TFW again when it gained F-16s in 1986. The D would hold out until 1987 when the 307th TFS swapped for Vipers all the EF-4Cs were in Indiana in 1985, split between the two squadrons in their ANG. the avionics for the Weasel mission got removed, but the antennae and strike camera housing were left alone. They did not do any SEAD after joining the Guard.....
-
hello all, im trying to make the F and D model takeoffs run more like the G an H models where they have that is the weird little almost nose down attitude and gentle lift off runway ( if you dont apply any input). currently the D and Fs im working with try to imitate the Phantom jocks with sharp pitched climbs. pretty sure a Big Belly D shouldnt be 1000ft over the runway at the halfway mark. what entries in the data ini should i be looking at to adjust/ match to the G?
-
wicked, but me thinks you need to move the kill marks entry below the lightning bolt entry in the decal ini another jet of teh same era .... ish
-
not yet. theyre still on the todo list, but im also waiting on a potential new model as well as the research wrap up for them
-
-
-
-
you should try some of ravenclaws new 131 pods. so long as you dont load a 1970s vintage pod onto a 2000s mission you should be perfectly fine. and you know him, he has practically every model used everywhen by everywhere
-
where'd you hear theyre retiring in 2030? production ends 2027, but they dont have anything to replace it right now. 230 35s wont exactly cut it...
-
SF2 not well optimized for newer systems?
daddyairplanes replied to JamesWilson's topic in General Discussion
(feels judged while converting stock B-52D textures to 2048....) -
damn near every USAF aircraft got the SEA camo treatment after 1967. pure interceptors (F-101Bs, F-106s) and special mission birds were the exception to that rule. and the F-102 was the exception to the exception
-
-
one of V2K's last birds. it was a challenge up until it wasnt heres another collaboration 'tween me and Ed. we had a few of them over the years
-
-
SF2 not well optimized for newer systems?
daddyairplanes replied to JamesWilson's topic in General Discussion
the main time i experience crashes is after running 3-4 unique missions back to back. but these are hard, system killing (not just CTD) crashes run three then quit is what i usually do. also i forget specifics (other than it being designed for and therefore better on dual core rather than quad core systems), but yes it was optimized for systems from a decade ago -
you know i dont ever keep it simple that said, if i can get a HSAB similar to the Hound Dog pylon, i'll need to ask you about GBU-15s. thats teh main reason why im interested in HSABs all of a sudden
-
looking for an existing Heavy Stores Adapter Beam pylon that i might have overlooked, or requesting a new one i know it's part of the model for the G and H models that are in game, but not so much the stock D model however. not looking for ravenclaw007 level of a model (unless he has one up his sleeve ), just looking for something to better work on a late 70s/early 80s bomber can also do texture and ini work. just needing a model any assistance would be greatly appreciated
