new Tornado 3d model

[Stratos 3,192]

You will release a manual for all those new features, right?

Are you using anything we don't know to make all this new avionics or simply putting the engine to its limits?

[+guuruu 5,909]

Second option ;-)

Yup, i'll do small manual ;-)

 

[+yakarov79 11,089]

 

9 hours ago, Stratos said:

ou will release a manual for all those new features, right?

Are you using anything we don't know to make all this new avionics or simply putting the engine to its limits?

he is doing simple things complicated.....and it works....

[+Hans Topp 115]

 

If it works, do not ask or touch it 

[RustyKurnass 658]

Oh my,

I think for much time if is possible loft bombing in SF2,and now,voilà!

Killer job mate!

[+guuruu 5,909]

Have found interesting things here.

Tonka can use WE-177 in 3 ways .

1) Laydown -> we can forget it ;-), no way to simulate 45s delay (or maybe I'm wrong??)

2) Low level LOFT -> I did non-retarded versions of WE for this method -> it's working well with present radar LOFT bombing.

3) Hi level RETARDED -> I must add calibration for this method to radar, but it's no problem now.

 

 

deliverymethods.pdf

[+guuruu 5,909]

And example. I turned off HUD and used only radar.

It was non-retarded 10kT WE-177A.

Initial speed/alt were over 1Ma/1000 ft. LOFT angle over 35 deg and distance of drop around 5.5-6 NM.

I should turn back earlier, but was watching bomb ;-)

Accuracy for this method is far, far enought .

And I feel bad .... it was friendly air base ...

 

Edited February 22, 2018 by guuruu

[MICHOO 4]

First of all, fantastic work!

Now, considering your skills and talent, do you think it's possible to do something for older planes?

Level bombing using radar, LABS, DIANE?

[+guuruu 5,909]

Possible ... if you have cockpit 3d max files ;-)

[Stratos 3,192]

I'm speechless guuruu, really looking forward to try this one!!

[Stratos 3,192]

8 hours ago, guuruu said:

Have found interesting things here.

Tonka can use WE-177 in 3 ways .

1) Laydown -> we can forget it ;-), no way to simulate 45s delay (or maybe I'm wrong??)

2) Low level LOFT -> I did non-retarded versions of WE for this method -> it's working well with present radar LOFT bombing.

3) Hi level RETARDED -> I must add calibration for this method to radar, but it's no problem now.

 

 

deliverymethods.pdf

Excuse me igonorance, but are you talking about A-G radar?

[+guuruu 5,909]

Yup.

[Stratos 3,192]

3 hours ago, guuruu said:

Yup.

But you cannot lock anything on A-G radar

[+yakarov79 11,089]

'in this method no need to lock...you just have to observe radar...

needs practice but it really works...considering what we can do in this game and what we can't..

[Stratos 3,192]

6 minutes ago, yakarov79 said:

'in this method no need to lock...you just have to observe radar...

needs practice but it really works...considering what we can do in this game and what we can't..

Sounds really interesting!!

[+dtmdragon 2,704]

Watching with anticipation!

[+Nyghtfall 2,154]

Looks interesting. Too bad we need the 3D-files for the cockpit, though.

[+guuruu 5,909]

11 hours ago, guuruu said:

distance of drop around 5.5-6 NM.

Maybe 5-6NM doesn't look impressive... but imagine.

You released bomb at alt 600-700m (after LOFT) and it hitted target far around 10-11km ;-)

[+guuruu 5,909]

Just finished calibration for 2nd method.

30-40k feet, 1,5 and over Ma, retarded nuke.

Ofc you must choose way of bombing before take off and load retarded or non-retarded WE-177 .

[+guuruu 5,909]

[fallenphoenix1986 603]

Been away for a few weeks and this just keeps getting better and better 

[jack33 90]

Please put the pilot's legs in the cockpit

 

[Stratos 3,192]

Not the question is, when??

[+yakarov79 11,089]

14 hours ago, jack33 said:

Please put the pilot's legs in the cockpit

 

sounds cruel...

37 minutes ago, Stratos said:

Not the question is, when??

You know when....around 2 weeks..

[Stratos 3,192]

I konw about the 2 weeks, and I will be patient, just really curious about all the new avionics!!